Canada: An Important Perspective On Data Breach Response - In Conversation With David Loukidelis, QC

Last Updated: August 11 2014
Article by Kelly Friedman

After publication of my article "Why Your Lawyer Should Be the First Point of Contact after a Data Breach," I had the honour of receiving an email from someone whom I had never met. That person was David Loukidelis, QC, who has taught privacy law and was formerly BC's Information and Privacy Commissioner and then Deputy Attorney General.

David raised a point in response to my article. Specifically, he noted that it may not be in the public interest, or indeed the organization's self-interest, to claim solicitor-client privilege to insulate information about breaches of personal information from privacy regulators who are mandated to investigate such data breaches.

This raises the crucial issue of reporting to and co-operating with regulators, an issue I had not addressed head-on in "Why Your Lawyer Should Be the First Point of Contact after a Data Breach." Never one to give up an opportunity for dialogue on a data-related legal issue, I asked David to share his views with me.

Kelly Friedman: In your experience as a privacy commissioner, were there data breach investigations of the kind that required IT or forensic assistance?

David Loukidelis: Those days were in some senses early days—many of the breaches we faced were rudimentary from a technological perspective. Think of personal injury files full of medical records blowing in the wind on a Vancouver street, or medical records turning up as props on a film set, that kind of thing. But we did have a few breaches where we had to go outside for specialist IT advice. One case involved a public body's claim that, because the backup tapes it had lost could not be read unless you had software that was not generally available, it didn't matter that it had failed to encrypt the information it lost. Our technical expert determined that this was true: the chance protection of technical obscurity was a valid argument (in light of the fact that the information involved was not at all sensitive).

KF: How did your office's involvement begin, given that there was no mandatory breach notification legislation in place?

DL: A lot of the breaches came to light through media exposure, where someone would go to the media and report files blowing in the wind or whatever. That's shifted over the years, and witnesses started to come directly to us. Then organizations started self-reporting. The thinking—rightly so, in my view—seems to have been that it's better to get expert support from the commissioner's office than to have them taken by surprise by a media report and thus be caught off guard. A privacy commissioner can properly only go so far in supporting breach mitigation or reporting, of course, but voluntary self-reporting can be a valuable and practical approach.

KF: Can you give me a sense of the approach taken by the BC Information & Privacy Commissioner's Office to data breach investigations, and the goals the Office attempted to achieve?

DL: During my time, whether we were lucky or not, we expected and got co-operation. We had full disclosure of relevant records and information, access to facilities and to representatives, and so on. This dovetailed with our perspective that an educational and remedial outcome was the preferred goal. I can't speak for Commissioner Denham, of course, but her approach quite clearly has been along the same lines and she's issued some excellent investigation reports in the process.

KF: During investigations, did you feel there was sufficient co-operation from the entity under examination, or was the relationship antagonistic?

DL: Perhaps it was sheer good luck again, but I can't think of a single case where there was anything approaching antagonism or obstruction. Sure, there were cases where we agreed to disagree on the findings and recommendations, but we noted those in our reports, so that the public and media could judge the situation for themselves. I can't speak to what's happening now in BC or elsewhere, but it would appear from Commissioner Denham's reports that her investigations are receiving co-operation from those being investigated.

KF: Do you feel that the involvement of external legal counsel assisted or hindered your investigations, and in what way?

DL: Many of the cases in which I was involved didn't involve counsel at all, though that was true more of private sector cases. Government lawyers showed up on more files than in the private sector. There's a risk, in my view, in engaging counsel unless necessary to deal with legal issues that cannot be addressed without their involvement. This is because a lawyer's zeal in protecting a client can force a regulator to lawyer-up as well, leading to a more drawn-out, costly and litigious approach. There's a fine line in many cases, I know, between the understandable need for someone who's being investigated to protect their interests legally, on the one hand, and taking a co-operative approach, on the other. The latter doesn't always work, to be sure, and—noting class actions, fines under privacy laws and so on—counsel may be needed if the legal consequences look serious from the outset or the investigation develops in a way that warrants legal support.

KF: In my previous article, I was making the point that the lawyer must be involved in the investigation from the outset, so as to protect findings from disclosure in subsequent litigation. In my view, in order to ensure that a company will make a fulsome investigation and take proper remedial steps, the company needs to know that it can engage freely with its lawyers and other specialists. Do you think that such a role for lawyers can be reconciled with co-operation with a privacy commissioner's office and its mandate to act in the public interest?

DL: Your perspective clearly has validity: if a company has investigated itself and wishes to protect the findings from later disclosure in litigation, it's eminently sensible to try to protect that process and the findings. As far as co-operating with a privacy commissioner, I bet that in many cases the commissioner's office won't be interested in the outcome of the internal investigation. They may ask for underlying material or the findings themselves, but in many cases I expect they'll want to do their own investigation, to gather their own facts and make their own findings and recommendations. That's the stage at which co-operation can play an appropriate part.

The only other thing I'll say is that, if a privacy commissioner asks to see material you think is privileged, remember that the commissioner may be able to compel you to produce it despite the privilege. Much depends on the statutory language used to express the commissioner's power of compulsion. If a company believes that claiming privilege as against a commissioner is truly necessary, by all means do so. But in many cases it'll be more practical to co-operate by respecting the demand (and if the information is compelled, the case law suggests—and some statutes expressly state—that the privilege over compelled material is preserved as against others).

KF: David, thank you for sharing your experiences and valuable insights.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions