Canada: The Supreme Court’s Keewatin Decision: How Will It Affect Canada’s Resource Industries?

On July 11, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") issued its decision in Grassy Narrows First Nation v Ontario, 2014 SCC 48 ("Keewatin") and confirmed that Ontario has the exclusive power to "take up" treaty lands located in the Keewatin area of Treaty 3 within Ontario for development purposes.

The Keewatin decision is significant because this historical treaty is one of 11 historical numbered treaties across Canada that were instrumental in securing title and opening up the country for settlement. Several of these historical numbered treaties contain similar terms in respect to the Crown's ability to take up lands for development.

In those circumstances where the beneficial interest in the affected treaty lands is held by the province, the SCC has confirmed that the province will have the power to take up the lands and regulate the resources associated with such lands, subject to the duty to consult and accommodate, if appropriate, with the Aboriginal group. Any infringement of treaty rights must be justified in accordance with the "Sparrow/Badger" analysis under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 articulated in earlier decisions of the SCC.

While this decision is different from the recent Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44 ("Tsilhqot'in") decision because it involves treaty lands and not Aboriginal title, the SCC has now sent a strong message that the province is the decision maker when regulating lands and natural resources within its jurisdiction. For the resource sector, this provides a level of certainty in undergoing project development in significant parts of Canada where historical numbered treaties are applicable and lands are under provincial jurisdiction.

Background of Keewatin Decision

Grassy Narrows First Nation ("Grassy Narrows") originally commenced litigation to challenge Ontario's issuance of a forestry licence (the "Licence") for an area of the Keewatin region governed by Treaty 3. The federal government had entered into Treaty 3 with the Ojibway in 1873, establishing certain reserve lands retained by the Ojibway, and identifying other areas in which the Ojibway could harvest the non-reserve lands (which included the Keewatin lands) until such time as they were taken up for settlement, mining, forestry, or other purposes by the federal government. Canada subsequently annexed the Keewatin lands to Ontario through the Ontario Boundaries Extension Act, S.C. 1912, c. 40 ("1912 Legislation").

Grassy Narrows, a descendent of the Ojibway signatories, challenged the Licence, asserting that Ontario was not authorized to take up Treaty 3 lands without the consent of Canada. Whether Ontario had such unilateral authority was the first of two threshold questions put to the trial judge. If the answer to that question was no, the second threshold question became whether Ontario alone had the authority under the Constitution Act, 1867 to justifiably infringe the Grassy Narrows' treaty rights.

The Ontario Supreme Court held that Treaty 3 required a two-step process for Ontario to take up lands, which involved obtaining federal authorization. The Court of Appeal overturned the trial judge's finding, and held that no two-step process or federal authorization was contemplated by Treaty 3.

SCC Analysis: Reasons Behind the Keewatin Ruling

The SCC dismissed the appeal, upholding the Court of Appeal's finding that Ontario had the authority to take up the lands. In reaching this conclusion, the Court noted the following:

  • All treaties are entered into on behalf of the Crown, and are therefore binding on whichever level of government (federal or provincial) has a beneficial interest in the lands, irrespective of which was signatory to the treaty;
  • There was no evidence that the participants in the negotiation for Treaty 3 intended a two-step process;
  • A provisional boundary agreement between Canada and Ontario in 1894 reflects the agreement that the beneficial owner of the land had the right to take up those lands, and this was incorporated into relevant legislation that had been enacted in 1891;
  • For over 100 years, the Ojibway did not challenge the authority of Ontario to take up lands;
  • Canada annexed the Keewatin lands to Ontario through the 1912 Legislation, resulting in a transfer of beneficial interest, not a transfer of Crown rights and obligations;
  • The 1912 Legislation included language confirming that Ontario would recognize the rights of the Aboriginals and obtain any necessary surrenders in the same manner that Canada had prior;
  • As a result of sections 109, 92(5) and 92(A) of the Constitution Act, 1867 Ontario has the exclusive power to take up lands under Treaty 3; and
  • Powers under treaties are bound by the duties of the Crown, including those fiduciary responsibilities attached to the Crown when dealing with Aboriginal interests.

SCC Affirms Province Must Consider Project Impacts on Aboriginal Groups

Although the SCC answered the first threshold question in the affirmative, it went on to confirm that Ontario had the authority to justifiably infringe Grassy Narrows' treaty rights, provided it could meet the test under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The SCC affirmed that where a province intends to take up lands for a project within its jurisdiction, it must consider the impact of the project on the Aboriginal group's treaty rights, and deal with the group in good faith with the intention of substantially addressing their concerns (citing Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage), 2005 SCC 69, at para 52, and 55, and Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010, at para. 168). The adverse impact of the Crown's project and therefore, the extent of the duty to consult and accommodate is a matter of degree.

Finally, not every take-up will necessarily constitute an infringement of treaty rights. However, where the take-up leaves the Aboriginal group with no meaningful treaty right over their traditional territory where such rights were exercised, then a potential action for treaty infringement will arise. Whether the infringement is justifiable will be decided in accordance with the "Sparrow/Badger" analysis under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. Interjurisdictional immunity, or the theory that federal powers trump provincial powers where there is competing jurisdiction, will not prevent a province from justifiably infringing on treaty rights (Tsilhqot'in.)

Implications on Natural Resource Industries in Canada

The SCC confirmed that while the federal government may remain responsible for Aboriginals and reserve lands under section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867, the authority to take up non-reserve treaty lands lies with the level of government with a beneficial interest in those lands. Provinces have a beneficial interest in those lands within their boundaries that are subject to provincial jurisdiction and also have the authority to make laws and regulate natural resources in relation to such lands.

Under Treaty 3 and similarly worded historical numbered treaties across Canada, the Crown is permitted to take up the treaty lands for development purposes. Thus, the Crown (being the province where lands are within its jurisdiction) is able to take up lands without the consent of the federal government. However, provinces are still responsible for upholding the honour of the Crown and the accompanying fiduciary obligations to Aboriginals, and, therefore, the Crown is still subject to the requirement to consult and accommodate with the Aboriginal group, where appropriate. If the province's actions infringe the Aboriginal group's meaningful treaty rights, those actions will need to be justifiable under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, just as is required of infringements on Aboriginal rights that are not governed by treaties.

Where project proponents seek to develop resource projects on lands within provincial jurisdiction, it is the province that will regulate these projects, without the necessity of obtaining the consent of the federal government even where treaty rights might be at issue. This should result in a more streamlined process for project proponents when the lands are solely within provincial jurisdiction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions