Canada: Supreme Court Clarifies Provincial Aboriginal Consultation Responsibilities When Issuing Resource Permits In "Keewatin" And Applies "Tsilqot’in" Infringement Test

The Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision in Grassy Narrows First Nation v Ontario (Natural Resources) (also known as "Keewatin") underscores once again the Crown's duty to consult. It asserts the need for provinces and territories to consult early with Aboriginal communities and not wait for a resource project proponent to reach a deal with the community. The Supreme Court's decision, released on July 11, 2014, also dealt with infringement of treaty rights – and specifically the Grassy Narrows First Nation and Wabauskang First Nation's harvesting rights under Treaty 3. The Supreme Court applied the test used by the Court in its June 26 decision in Roger William (on behalf of the Tsilhqot'in Nation) v BC.


Treaty 3 and the Keewatin Lands

When Canada was expanding westward and settlers traveled along a route through Northwestern Ontario and Eastern Manitoba, it sought to ensure safe travels through Ojibway lands. In 1873, Treaty 3 was negotiated between the Chiefs of the Ojibway and the Dominion of Canada.

The Ojibway yielded ownership (according to Canada) or negotiated land sharing (according to the Ojibway) of the Treaty 3 territory to Canada in return for reserve lands, annuities and goods. The Ojibway retained harvesting rights on non-reserve land within the Treaty area until the land was "taken up" for settlement, mining, lumbering, or other purposes by the Government of the Dominion of Canada or any of its duly authorized subjects.

Treaty 3 territory covers a large portion of Northwestern Ontario and Eastern Manitoba, known as the Keewatin lands. At the time the Treaty was signed, the Keewatin lands were under the jurisdiction of the Government of Canada. Since 1912, these lands, except for a small area in Manitoba, have been part of Ontario.

The Grassy Narrows First Nation (Grassy Narrows) is located within the Keewatin lands. Wabauskang First Nation (Wabauskang) also has traditional territory within the Keewatin lands.

Litigation Respecting the Abitibi/Resolute Forestry Operations Licence

In 1997, the Ontario Minister of Natural Resources (MNR) issued a licence to Abitibi-Consolidated Inc., now Resolute FP Canada Inc. (Resolute), to carry out forestry operations on Crown lands within the Keewatin lands. In 2005, Grassy Narrows commenced litigation against the provincial and federal governments and Resolute alleging that the licence violated their Treaty 3 harvesting rights (Keewatin).

Grassy Narrows argued that, absent federal authorisation, Ontario could not "take up" lands (i.e., issue permits) within the Keewatin lands under Treaty 3 so as to limit the harvesting rights protected under the Treaty. Grassy Narrows also argued that Ontario did not have the authority to infringe the Grassy Narrows' treaty rights under the Constitution Act, 1867 (Constitution).

Lower Court Decisions and the Two-Step Process

The trial judge agreed with Grassy Narrows that Ontario could not take up lands within the Keewatin lands without first obtaining federal government approval. Further, the trial judge found that the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity allowed only the federal government, not the provinces, to infringe treaty rights. This became known as the two-step process.

The Ontario Court of Appeal rejected the two-step process set up by the trial judge (see "Landmark Keewatin Ruling Overturned"). Federal approval was not required prior to issuing provincial permits. The Court did not consider whether interjurisdictional immunity prevented provincial infringement on treaty rights.

Grassy Narrows and Wabauskang appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC).

The Supreme Court of Canada Decision

Two-Step Process Rejected

The SCC unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision, rejecting the two-step process and concluding that, "Ontario and Ontario alone has the power to take up lands under Treaty 3". However, the SCC determined that the power to take up lands is not unconditional and that the Province is bound by the duties attendant on the Crown.

Ontario's authority to take up the lands is derived from both agreements and constitutional provisions. The division of powers set out in the Constitution determines the respective powers and obligations of the federal and provincial levels of government. When Ontario's borders were expanded to include the Keewatin lands, Ontario also became responsible for the promises made between the Crown and the Ojibway under Treaty 3 when acting within its constitutional powers.

Relying on Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 SCC 73, and subsequent decisions, the SCC reiterated that both provincial and federal governments are responsible for fulfilling the promises and satisfying the honour of the Crown.

The appellants argued that the federal government has jurisdiction over "Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians" under section 91(24) of the Constitution and therefore has the authority to approve the taking up of provincial land. Rejecting this view, the SCC referred to Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada (Minister of Canada Heritage), 2005 SCC 69. The SCC stated that, although section 91(24) allows the federal government to enact legislation dealing with Indians and reserves that may have some incidental effects on provincial land, it does not allow the federal government to approve taking up land for provincial purposes.

The SCC also noted that Ontario has been exercising its power to take up lands through permits and authorisations on Crown lands for over 100 years without any objection. The SCC stated that this suggests that federal approval is not a necessary element of taking up lands under Treaty 3.

Limits on the Power To Take up Land

The SCC stated that, when taking up lands under Treaty 3, Ontario must "exercise its powers in conformity with the honour of the Crown and the exercise of those powers is subject to the fiduciary duties that lie on the Crown in dealing with Aboriginal interests" .

Therefore, prior to issuing permits and authorizations, Ontario must respect Ojibway Treaty harvesting rights under Treaty 3.

Ontario must also fulfill its duty to consult and accommodate. Potential impacts on Treaty rights are considered an infringement. Any permit or legislation infringing Treaty rights must be justified, as set out by the SCC on June 26, 2014 in Roger William (on behalf of the Tsilhqot'in Nation) v British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44 (Roger William/Tsilhqot'in) (see "Supreme Court of Canada Grants Tsilhqot'in Aboriginal Title in William").

In Roger William/Tsilhqot'in, the SCC determined that infringement may be justified if the Crown can establish a "compelling and substantial" objective consistent with its fiduciary duty owed to the Aboriginal group and has consulted the Aboriginal group. Of significance was the SCC's assertion that the "compelling and substantial objective" must be considered from both Aboriginal and public perspectives. In addition, such an objective must further the goal of reconciliation with Aboriginal groups.

As in Roger William/Tsilhqot'in, the SCC determined in Keewatin that the interjurisdictional immunity argument did not apply. Moreover, it found that the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity in no way precludes Ontario from applying the infringement test prior to issuing permits and authorisations.

Significance of Keewatin

Impacts on Provinces and Territories

Together with the Roger William/Tsilhqot'in case, the SCC's decision in Keewatin sets significant sign posts for provinces and territories moving forward.

Provinces and territories may need to step up consultation activity rather than relying on proponents to make deals with Aboriginal people. Prior to issuing permits and authorizations which have the potential to infringe rights, they must meaningfully consult with Aboriginal people on potential impacts on their rights. Provinces and territories must also meet their fiduciary duty and uphold the honour of the Crown in their relationships with Aboriginal people. This is not necessarily the "burden" that some commentators have described. It results from the unique relationship between Aboriginal people and the Crown. It arises from treaties signed by early Canadians when they asserted sovereignty over lands where Aboriginal people had already been living and exercising sovereignty. The treaties are no less important than the Constitution in defining Canada.

The SCC in Keewatin also stated

Not every taking up will constitute an infringement of the harvesting rights set out in Treaty 3. This said, if the taking up leaves the Ojibway with no meaningful right to hunt, fish or trap in relation to the territories over which they traditionally hunted, fished, and trapped, a potential action for treaty infringement will arise (Mikisew, at para. 48).

What remains unclear is how to interpret an infringement in terms of a "meaningful right to hunt, fish or trap". No doubt this will be the subject of future litigation.

Impacts on Proponents

Where does this leave proponents? It is more important than ever that proponents engage early with Aboriginal people in partnerships and when seeking consent for activities that could impact Aboriginal or Treaty rights. These activities provide the greatest certainty to move important resource projects forward. While provinces and territories may delegate some procedural aspects of consultation, they should be taking a leading role in defining their expectations for meaningful consultation.

Julia Paillé, Summer Law Student, assisted with the preparation of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Julie Abouchar
Charles Birchall
John J.P. Donihee
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.