Canada: Arm’s Length And Back-To-Back Loans

Last Updated: June 1 2005

Article by Bill Maclagan, ©2005 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Taxation - April 2005

One of the critical elements in complying with the 5/25 exemption is that the borrower and lender must act at arm’s length at the time an interest payment is made. Whether or not parties act at arm’s length is a mixed question of law and fact. Related persons are deemed not to deal at arm’s length. It is a question of fact whether other persons deal at arm’s length.

Because a corporation and the person who controls it are related, a loan from a foreign parent to a Canadian subsidiary cannot fit within the 5/25 exemption. As a result, corporations have from time to time attempted to structure intercorporate debt so as to fit within the 5/25 exemption. Various structures have included "back-to-back" loans where cash is loaned from a foreign parent to an arm’s length foreign company that then lends to the Canadian subsidiary and loans from a foreign bank to a Canadian subsidiary where the foreign parent has granted a fully cash secured guarantee to support the loan. The Canada Revenue Agency (the CRA) has attacked these structures using various arguments, including the application of the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR). An example of this is the case Siemens Canada Limited (formerly Westinghouse Canada Inc.) v. Her Majesty The Queen, which is currently being litigated in the Tax Court of Canada.

Facts Of The Case

In Siemens, the facts involve a restructuring of debt in an international group of companies. At the time of the transaction, Siemens Canada Limited was called Westinghouse Canada Inc. (Westinghouse). Westinghouse was a Canadian resident corporation that carried on the business of manufacturing and distributing electrical equipment. Westinghouse was the wholly owned subsidiary of a US resident corporation called Westinghouse Electric Corporation (WEC).

At December 31, 1990, Westinghouse owed $84 million to a related corporation in Switzerland known as Westinghouse Electric S.A. (WELSA). In 1991, WEC determined that Westinghouse needed a $100 million credit facility to support its day to day working capital. WEC thus retained First National Bank in Chicago (First Chicago) as its agent to secure the financing.

First Chicago obtained the required financing from two unrelated French banks (BNP and BBLF) in the amount of $50 million from each bank. BNP and BBLF each agreed to lend Westinghouse $50 million at 9.25% per annum (the Loans). The terms of the Loans were 5 years plus one week, and they were structured to fit the requirements of the 5/25 exemption.

Had the transaction ended there, there would have been no issue, but it did not end there. WEC agreed to guarantee the Loans. To secure the guarantee, WEC deposited and pledged $50 million in cash with each French bank. The deposits earned 9.18% per annum. Effectively, WEC had as much cash committed and at risk as if it had loaned the funds to Westinghouse. Part XIII withholding tax was avoided at a cost of 0.07% per annum.

In 1998, the Minister of National Revenue (Minister) assessed Westinghouse for failure to withhold tax under Part XIII of the Act from the interest payments made to BNP and BBLF. The Minister took the position that the exemption was not applicable.

Westinghouse has appealed to the Tax Court of Canada, but the matter has not yet been heard.

The Arguments

The arguments in the case detail exactly how the CRA will attack a "back-to-back" lending arrangement that is viewed as circumventing the arm’s length requirement or an arrangement where the parent fully secures the borrowing of a Canadian subsidiary to a foreign bank by putting funds on deposit with the foreign bank.

First, the Minister has argued that BNP and BBLF were not the true lenders but the true lender was WEC. The Minister argued that BNP and BBLF were simply accommodation parties, intermediaries or conduits. If this were the case, of course, Westinghouse would not be acting at arm’s length with the true lender, because they were related. The Minister argued that the $100 million from BNP and BBLF was loaned to Westinghouse at the same time as $100 million was deposited by WEC with the French banks, and BNP and BBLF would not have loaned the $100 million to Westinghouse if the $100 million deposit had not been made. Of course, the profit made by the French banks (at 0.07%) appears so small that it looks almost like a fee for being a conduit.

This argument will be interesting. Just because BNP and BBLF insisted on a fully secured guarantee does not mean they did not act as lenders to Westinghouse. Presumably, the result will depend on the agreements in place between BNP and BBLF and Westinghouse. If those documents disclose a lender-borrower relationship and no agency, presumably this should not be altered simply because the parent grants a secured guarantee.

The second issue that the Minister has raised is the issue of whether or not BNP and BBLF were acting at arm’s length with Westinghouse. It appears to be the Minister’s position that because of the secured guarantee, BNP and BBLF were merely facilitating a transaction whereby a related corporation was able to lend to Westinghouse and take advantage of the 5/25 exemption. Westinghouse has, of course, argued that BNP and BBLF and Westinghouse were clearly not related and, therefore, were not deemed to be acting at non-arm’s length. Further, Westinghouse has argued that the loans were negotiated through hard bargaining between Westinghouse and BNP and BBLF. All of the interests of Westinghouse were opposite to those interests of BNP and BBLF. To further support its argument, Westinghouse pointed to the fact that First Chicago was engaged to obtain financing for Westinghouse and received a fee of $340,000 to obtain it. This issue will simply be a question of fact for the trial judge to determine looking at all of the circumstances and facts involved.

The final argument the Minister relied on was GAAR. The Minister argued that even if the transaction otherwise qualified for the 5/25 exemption, the transaction with BNP and BBLF was an avoidance transaction within the meaning of GAAR. The Minister argued that the transaction resulted in a tax benefit to Westinghouse, being the avoidance of Part XIII tax, and was not undertaken or arranged primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obtain the tax benefit of avoiding Part XIII tax. The Minister argued that the transaction would result in a misuse of subparagraph 212(1)(b)(vii) of the Act or an abuse having regard to the provisions of the Act read as a whole including Part XIII of the Act. As a result, the Minister assessed Westinghouse by recharacterizing the transaction as a loan from WEC.

The counter arguments of Westinghouse are interesting in this case. First, Westinghouse argued there is a procedural problem in that they were not properly notified that the CRA would apply GAAR. Second, Westinghouse argued that it did not receive a tax benefit as a result of the transaction. "Tax benefit" is defined in section 245 of the Act as "a reduction, avoidance or deferral of tax or other amount payable under this Act or an increase in a refund of tax or other amount under this Act".

Under subsection 212(1) of the Act, it is the non-resident that has the primary liability for the tax under Part XIII of the Act. Westinghouse or any other payor of interest withholds and remits for the account of the non-resident. Thus, Westinghouse has argued that if there was any tax benefit obtained in the situation, it was obtained by the non-resident lenders (or possibly WEC) not by Westinghouse and, therefore, GAAR is not properly applicable to Westinghouse.

Third, Westinghouse has stated that it did not engage in an avoidance transaction. Westinghouse has stated that it entered into the Loan transactions for bona fide purposes other than to obtain a tax benefit. Westinghouse argues that it required additional working capital and that is why it engaged First Chicago to find the necessary $100 million financing, which First Chicago did. Westinghouse also argued that prior to the Loan transactions, it borrowed the amount of $84 million from WELSA. Westinghouse argued that, under the United States of America and Switzerland Income Tax Convention, there is a reduced withholding tax rate from 35% to 5% on dividends paid from WELSA to WEC if the following conditions were met: (a) The US shareholder owned 95% or more of all the voting shares of the Swiss company; and (b) Not more than 25% of the gross income of WELSA was derived from interest and dividends excluding interest and dividends from a subsidiary.

Because Westinghouse was not a subsidiary of WELSA, interest earned from its $84 million loan was not excluded from the calculation in (b) set out above. Westinghouse thus argued that one of the reasons why there was a desire to change lending arrangements was that if WELSA provided further working capital to Westinghouse, it would risk increasing the Switzerland withholding tax on dividends. Consequently, Westinghouse had a bona fide purpose (other than obtaining a Canadian tax benefit) in restructuring its credit facility, being attempting to ensure that the withholding tax between WELSA and WEC did not increase from 5% to 35%. This, Westinghouse argued, is not a tax benefit for the purposes of GAAR. Westinghouse also has stated that, as a matter of fact, the entering into the guarantee Deposit and the Pledge Agreement between WEC, BNP and BBLF allowed Westinghouse to secure a lower borrowing rate than existed with the previous debt to WELSA. As such, it resulted in a significant economic benefit to Westinghouse.

It will be interesting to see how the court deals with this situation, especially the argument that the Part XIII tax is a tax on the non-resident and, therefore, the avoidance of the Part XIII tax did not result in any tax benefit to Westinghouse.

The case will be of significant importance given the CRA’s stance that these facilitated loans or "back to back" loan transactions do not fit within the provisions of subparagraph 212(1)(b)(vii) of the Act or, if they do, will be subject to GAAR. To the extent the court finds for the taxpayer, the case may make it easier for international groups to structure financing into Canada and reduce withholding tax.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.