Canada: Bill C-31’s Serious Offences Amendment To Section 241 Of The Income Tax Act

Last Updated: June 27 2014
Article by Glen Jennings and Erica Maidment

Most Read Contributor in Canada, October 2018

Taxpayers have cause for concern over proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act.1 Buried in a recent 375-page omnibus bill, Bill C-31 is a provision giving Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") officials the power to release taxpayer information to the police when, in their opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the information will afford evidence of a serious offence. Providing CRA officials a list of offences in respect of which they may provide information to the police seems to create an obvious temptation, if not an invitation, to dig a little deeper in the course of a tax audit to look for dirty laundry. This is particularly concerning when auditors have access to a taxpayer's computer which may reveal significant personal details in addition to financial information. If Bill C-31 passes, CRA officials may be responsible for deciding whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that taxpayer information is evidence of a serious offence and should be turned over to police, rather than a judge hearing an application for a warrant, which would be the usual procedural route for obtaining this kind of evidence. The obvious question is whether the decision to breach taxpayer privacy should be left in the hands of government officials rather than a judge.

Admittedly, the CRA was previously able to disclose information of tax-related criminal wrongdoing disclosed in tax filings or legitimately uncovered in the course of an audit. The Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") has carefully balanced the dual role of the CRA as auditor and enforcer of criminal tax evasion. The power to disclose confidential information was also extended in recent years to include disclosure of information about registered charities (and entities applying for registration as charities) to CSIS, the RCMP and FINTRAC, where the information may relate to national security, terrorist financing or money laundering. Bill C-31, however, takes the role of CRA officials much further. Thus, it seems likely that only a very narrow use of this new power would survive a Charter challenge on the basis that it constitutes unreasonable search and seizure and violates the right against self-incrimination.

The Serious Offences Amendment: Proposed Subsection 241(9.5) of the ITA

As it stands, section 241 of the ITA prohibits CRA officials from disclosing taxpayer information, with some narrow exceptions. The new proposed exception would allow an official to provide to a law enforcement officer taxpayer information, if the official has reasonable grounds to believe that the information will afford evidence of a criminal offence from a laundry list of offences. For ease of reference, we will refer to this provision as the "Serious Offences Amendment." The breadth of listed offences is disturbing. Some of the specific offences that the CRA would be on the lookout for under the Serious Offences Amendment include:

  • corruption offences and conspiracy to commit those corruption offences
  • prison breach
  • criminal harassment
  • sexual assault
  • kidnapping
  • human trafficking
  • abduction
  • motor vehicle theft
  • breaking and entering into a non-dwelling place
  • entering a dwelling-house without lawful excuse
  • arson for fraudulent purpose
  • money laundering

In addition, the Serious Offences Amendment applies when the CRA official has reasonable grounds to believe that the information is evidence of terrorism or organized crime, any offence that carries a mandatory minimum penalty, and any offence for which the maximum term of imprisonment is 14 years or 10 years, where the offence involves harm, drugs or weapons.

It would be an understatement to say that the Serious Offences Amendment is broad in its application. It is notable that the offences to which it applies have nothing to do with the enforcement of the ITA, and most have nothing to do with finances at all.

How Is the Law Changing?

Canadian residents are subject to income tax in Canada, as are some non-residents in certain circumstances. Subject to limited exceptions, taxpayers are required to file timely, complete and accurate income tax and information returns. The CRA has broad audit powers to compel taxpayers to provide documents and information to verify the information provided in tax filings.2 However, taxpayer information is strongly protected by s. 241 of the ITA and leading SCC cases, which confirm that the CRA cannot exercise its regulatory audit powers to gather information for a criminal investigation or on its own initiative or communicate such evidence to law enforcement authorities.

CRA officials may only disclose information if the taxpayer has already been charged with a crime, the police have obtained a warrant from the court, or there is an imminent danger of death or physical injury to a person. The Serious Offences Amendment fundamentally changes that, allowing CRA officials to communicate information to police on their own initiative and without warrant, if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the information is evidence of any of the listed offences.

While taxpayer information should be (and is) kept private from other citizens, there are numerous exceptions allowing for taxpayer information to be shared with other government bodies including the police. In particular, the CRA already has the ability to provide the police with information gathered using its powers under the ITA without warrant or imminent danger if the offence relates to a CRA official in the course of his or her duties.

What is so significant about the Serious Offences Amendment is that the offence need not have anything to do with the enforcement of the ITA. This is a considerable broadening of the CRA's power to communicate information to the police.

Charter

Significant legal confrontations have arisen from the CRA's use of its civil audit powers to ensure tax compliance. In R. v. Jarvis,3 the SCC declared the search and seizure of Mr. Jarvis' personal information by the CRA to be unconstitutional once the focus of the audit shifted from civil tax compliance to criminal tax evasion. After the authorities "cross the Rubicon" from civil auditing to investigating tax evasion, gathering information constituted unreasonable search and seizure pursuant to section 8 of the Charter and violated the right against self-incrimination.

Section 8 of the Charter governs the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. An individual's reasonable expectation of privacy is determined by the context in which privacy rights are invoked.4 In R. v. Plant,5 the SCC explained that factors to consider in assessing the expectation of privacy are the relationship between the party releasing information and claiming confidentiality, the place where the information was obtained, the manner in which it was obtained and the seriousness of the crime being investigated. While few privacy rights attach to information supplied to the authorities, and the authorities are generally free to share that information, taxpayer information is different in that taxpayers have no choice but to supply the CRA with information related to their tax returns. The ITA also allows the CRA to demand further information from taxpayers, as well as inspect their books, records and other documents (including bank statements, investment, business, and employment records), for the purposes of administration and enforcement of the ITA. The SCC held in Jarvis6 that "a taxpayer's privacy interest in records that may be relevant to the filing of his or her tax return is relatively low."

It was in the exclusively tax-related context of Jarvis that the SCC examined whether or not the CRA could use its audit powers to assist its investigation of criminal tax evasion offences for which Mr. Jarvis could serve jail time. The decision in Jarvis turned on a distinction between the audit context and the criminal tax evasion investigation context. The SCC concluded that use of audit powers constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure "where the predominant purpose of a particular inquiry is the determination of penal liability..."7. However, the SCC qualified this statement by saying that "there is nothing preventing auditors from passing to investigators their files containing validly obtained audit materials."8 To summarize, CRA officials could run both a civil audit and a criminal investigation, but once the criminal investigation was the predominant purpose, the CRA could no longer use its audit powers. Those same searches, seizures and compelled information from the taxpayer would have to be authorized by warrant.

The statutory requirement that individuals provide information to the CRA also raises the right against self-incrimination. Not all statutorily compelled statements must be excluded from evidence in a proceeding where liberty is at stake.9 This is particularly so in regulatory contexts "where the procedures being challenged have generally been designed (and are employed) as part of an administrative scheme in the public interest..."10 In R. v. White,11 the SCC explained that "[i]n some contexts, the factors that favour the importance of the search for truth will outweigh the factors that favour protecting the individual against undue compulsion by the state."

The SCC explained in Jarvis that to respect the taxpayer's right to silence, once a criminal tax evasion investigation is commenced, CRA officials may no longer avail themselves of the power to compel information from the taxpayer pursuant to its audit powers. The investigators must at that stage provide the taxpayer with a proper warning that an investigation has commenced12 and only conduct intrusive searches and seizures with warrant authorization.

Likely Charter Consequences

The courts will be obliged to apply an analysis similar to Jarvis to the Serious Offences Amendment, but the context will be much different. The SCC deemed the privacy interest in records to be relatively low in the context of providing information relevant to filing a tax return. However, the Serious Offences Amendment allows CRA officials to provide information to police on a broad array of offences, which go well beyond records or information relevant to the filing of a tax return. Indeed, it is hard to conceive how CRA officials, doing their job in a reasonable manner and respecting the privacy interests of Canadian citizens, are going to find information relevant to serious crimes beyond tax evasion and other financial offences. Tax evasion and other financial offences have a direct link to what we expect auditors to examine in the course of an audit. However, the long list of offences listed in Bill C-31 would seem to invite CRA officials to do some digging well beyond their audit role.

The SCC's remarks in Jarvis were made in the context of investigating offences directly connected with the administration of the ITA. With the Serious Offences Amendment, the fruits of this information gathering can be used for criminal investigations completely unrelated to the ITA. It is possible that this aspect of the Serious Offences Amendment leaves it vulnerable to an overbreadth or arbitrariness attack pursuant to the Charter.

For the CRA to apply the Serious Offences Amendment in a manner consistent with the Charter, the CRA would have to use the provision almost exclusively to address the problem that the government says it is there to solve: in cases where CRA officials truly stumble upon evidence of a listed offence in the process of an audit. It is very concerning, however, that a carefully constructed investigation by CRA officials may result in "stumbling upon" evidence of interest beyond that truly required under a civil tax audit. In other words, evidence relevant to the range of offences in the Serious Offences Amendment lacks a direct link to what we would anticipate auditors to come across doing their jobs reasonably. Bill C-31, therefore, does not appear to further the goals of a fair and reasonable self-reporting tax regime. Rather, it encourages broad investigations that "stumble" into the true criminal realm. The SCC has repeatedly emphasized the importance of context in the application of the Charter. In the future application of Bill C-31, the Crown is unlikely to have as favourable a context as in the Jarvis case. Unlike Jarvis, Bill C-31 will not simply lead to shades of gray situations (from audit of taxes to related investigation of tax evasion). Rather, it will lead to stark black and white situations (from audit to completely unrelated broad criminal investigation) that will raise red flags of Charter rights abuses.

What does this mean for the Serious Offences Amendment? It is likely that searches without a warrant conducted for the purposes of investigating criminal offences for which charges have not been laid could constitute unreasonable search and seizure, violating section 8 of the Charter. Thus, the use of audit powers by CRA officials on behalf of the police in order to obtain information and evidence that the police would otherwise need a warrant to obtain would not likely pass constitutional muster. For the sake of individual rights, it is important that courts curtail any such behaviour because it would unreasonably circumvent the need for judicial authorization to search and seize personal information for the purposes of a criminal investigation. It may also lead to closer scrutiny of CRA audits as people have more reason to challenge the breadth of those audits.

Why a New Exception?

The Serious Offences Amendment was ostensibly proposed to avoid the frustrating possibility that CRA auditors would find evidence of a crime that could not be disclosed to the police because the usual statutory conditions were not met. The usual example given by proponents is a CRA auditor finding child pornography when examining a taxpayer's computer. Police have also complained that to obtain a warrant to search tax files, they had to prove to the court that the proceeds of crime or money laundering existed prior to the search. The Serious Offences Amendment may also be intended to encourage reciprocity with police, who often provide the CRA with information for CRA investigations while the CRA is currently prevented from reciprocating.

The Broader Privacy Implications

The searching of computers and electronic databases is a fast-developing area of investigation and jurisprudence. Canadians store personal information on a wide variety of electronic devices and if we are deemed to waive our privacy interest in electronic information as a result of our state-mandated income tax regime, then we may lose our constitutional right to privacy. Fortunately, in R. v. Cole13 the SCC recognized the slippery slope leading to the annihilation of privacy if we do not retain some reasonable expectation in the information stored on our electronic devices. One can hope that the courts will be keen to maintain a relatively broad sphere of privacy protection over electronic evidence that is statutorily mandated to be provided to the CRA, but over which we otherwise all hold a high reasonable expectation of privacy. In other words, while the CRA may need to search the contents of a computer for data relevant to an audit, it ought to be very limited in accessing anything other than what is strictly required for an audit.

From a practical perspective, the possibility of information being passed on to police may also cause ITA compliance issues for the CRA. People who feel that their privacy may be violated may be reluctant to provide necessary information to the CRA. This could have serious consequences for the administration of the ITA and require the CRA to deploy all of its draconian powers to enforce compliance, which is a costly and undesirable outcome. As the SCC observed in Jarvis,14 the success of the administration of the ITA "depends primarily upon taxpayer forthrightness." On the other hand, failing to comply with the administration and enforcement provisions of the ITA may result in onerous civil penalties or the application of the ITA's criminal sanctions.

Conclusion

If the Serious Offences Amendment is not struck down as overbroad or arbitrary, it must be narrowly applied to respect sections 7 and 8 of the Charter. While in some contexts the factors that favour the search for truth will outweigh the factors favouring protecting the individual against undue compulsion by the state, in this context protection of the individual against undue compulsion by the state ought to prevail. As the SCC stated in Jarvis, even in cases of prosecutions under the ITA itself, "the state is pitted against the individual in an attempt to establish culpability" and jail terms can result from conviction.15 The Serious Offences Amendment goes well beyond the goals of the statute, which are to uphold a self-assessing and self-reporting income tax regime. The Serious Offences Amendment appears to invite the use of audit powers conferred by the ITA to assist in a broad spectrum of criminal investigations. Should the Serious Offences Amendment become law, CRA officials should only use this new power to pass along clear evidence of the listed offences when they, truly by chance, encounter such evidence in the course of an audit that is otherwise carefully managed to protect the privacy rights of the taxpayer.

Footnotes

1 Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp) ("ITA").

2 Sections 231.1 and 231.2 of the ITA.

3 2002 SCC 73 ("Jarvis").

4 Jarvis, at para 64

5 [1993] 3 SCR 281, at page 293.

6 Jarvis, at para 72.

7 Jarvis, at para 88 and 96.

8 Jarvis, at para 95.

9 Jarvis, at para 68.

10 Jarvis, at para. 72.

11 [1999] 2 SCR 417, at para 48.

12 Jarvis, at para 99.

13 2012 SCC 53.

14 Jarvis, at para 51.

15 Jarvis, at para 62.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions