Canada: Procurement And The Challenge Of Municipal Governance

Originally published October 2004

A short while ago, a client called to share the details of a procurement process gone wrong. The facts were unusually ghastly. The client, a just-declared unsuccessful bidder, had spent a princely sum of money – not to mention considerable time and effort – preparing and submitting a proposal, the kind that was supposed to knock the competition out of the box. Of course, had the script played itself out, these words would never have been written.

The difficulty was not with the merits of my client’s proposal, which by everyone’s account were impressive. Rather, the problem was with the tendering process. The tender document was a Request for Proposals (RFP). The issuer was a municipality. Throughout the tendering process, the issuer made no apparent effort to define the rights and obligations of either the bidders or itself. The RFP was pretty much silent on the issues of process, and the municipality offered no guidance to bidders after the closing of the bids. As result, the bidders never ceased making arguments to the municipality, and the municipality never ceased listening to the bidders’ arguments, even going so far as to counter publicly with its own remarks on the merits of each of the bids received. By the time a decision was announced on the outcome of the competition, the process, such as it was, had deteriorated into an unseemly public spectacle. The process was neither fair nor transparent and, as might be expected, it significantly increased the municipality’s risk profile.

Governance and Procurement

To be sure, some municipalities discharge their procurement responsibilities very well. Through competitive tendering, these municipalities generate optimal value-formoney for their stakeholders, they treat bidders fairly and with respect, and they do not needlessly increase their municipality’s exposure to liability.

There is enough waywardness around municipal procurement, however, to make anyone wonder why, with the current heightened concern globally over corporate governance and public accountability, so many municipalities are allowed to so frequently ignore the existing procurement rules. One can only imagine the fate of senior executives in the private sector today who would so systematically abdicate their responsibility in any area so central to their company’s operations, as procurement is to any municipality’s mandate.

Part of the explanation for the current disarray is that public sector procurement is often not supported by the necessary governace structure. A report released last July by Deloitte & Touche LLP makes the case. The report, which examined management practices at Canada Post, points to a number of instances where the CEO breached the rules and influenced the procurement process. The problem tends to be exacerbated at the municipal level, where governance structures are more often improvised, with the not unsurprising result that municipal procurement activities are frequently vulnerable to challenge. Lack of rigour in procurement can easily lead to lawsuits, or to such things as the RIM Park Financing Inquiry, the just-completed Toronto Computer Leasing Inquiry, and the just-started Toronto External Contracts Inquiry.

A more robust governance structure supporting the procurement mandate of municipalities is therefore badly needed. Measures need to be put in place that shore up the procurement legal framework. We now take a brief look at the body of rules that support and define municipal procurement, and then review some of the measures that can help municipalities improve their procurement risk profile.

The Legal Framework

The procurement legal framework is not fixed in time, or in place. There is a common core to it, a body of laws, that applies in both the public and private sectors across Canada. Beyond the core, however, the framework varies from municipality to municipality, from province to province, and it is subject to updates and amendments from time to time. There is also a large body of decisions that are issued by the courts each year in Canada that provide guidance, and make procurement a dynamic, if unpredictable area.

1. Revolution in the Caselaw

The 1981 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Ontario v. Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd1 ushered in the new procurement era. While the case significantly improved the bargaining position of issuers of tender documents, it went on to revolutionize the procurement process in Canada – in both the public and private sectors – by addressing tendering problems using something other than traditional contract law. The multitude of cases that have followed since have attempted to balance the rights and obligations of the parties to the procurement process by introducing a variety of implied terms that reflect the reasonable expectations of the parties.

2. The Agreement on Internal Trade The next major development for municipalities was the passing in 1999 of Annex 502.4 to the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT), which requires that Canadian municipalities (among other public sector bodies) "… establish a framework that will ensure equal access to procurement for all Canadian suppliers…".

In broad terms, the AIT aims to ensure that all Canadian suppliers have equal access to procurement opportunities and that public sector entities receive the benefit of the significant business advantages that flow from the competitive bidding process. For all of this to happen, the procurement process must be open and transparent, and participants must have confidence in the integrity of the process and those who operate it.

3. Section 271 of the Municipal Act, 2001

The most recent major development in municipal procurement in Ontario, and undoubtedly the most ambitious, is section 271 of the Municipal Act, 2001, which requires that municipalities in Ontario put in place a comprehensive procurement regime by January 1, 2005. Specifically, subsection 271(1) provides as follows:

"Before January 1, 2005, a municipality and a local board shall adopt policies with respect to its procurement of goods and services, including policies with respect to:

the types of procurement processes that shall be used; the goals to be achieved by using each type of procurement process; the circumstances under which each type of procurement process shall be used; the circumstances under which a tendering process is not required; the circumstances under which in-house bids will be encouraged as part of a tendering process; how the integrity of each procurement process will be maintained; how the interests of the municipality or local board, as the case may be, the public and persons participating in a procurement process will be protected; how and when the procurement process will be reviewed to evaluate their effectiveness; and any other prescribed matter."

The rationale behind the new provision is not entirely clear. On the one hand, it may simply reflect the growing concern globally with good corporate goverance and accountability. On the other, it may have been intended as a mechanism to implement the tendering requirements of the AIT. In this regard, some important issues arise regarding the application of – and potential conflict between – the principles and practices prescribed under section 271 and those set out under the Agreement, which need to be harmonized.

4. By-Laws, Policies and Procedures

In addition to the above framework, the procurement process at the municipal level is typically supported by a multiplicity of rules internal to the municipality. These include the policies, procedures and other controls and requirements put in place by the municipality itself. It is also supported by the practices established in specific industry sectors, such as those applicable in the construction industry, for example, and the fiduciary obligations that apply equally to the employees of the municipality and its elected officials.

Governance Mechanisms

When it comes to governance, whether in the corporate environmnent or in the field of public sector procurement, no single initiative is sufficient. A proper goverance structure normally involves putting in place a series of steps that complement each other and that support the overall objective. What this series of steps should include is not self-evident and varies from municipality to municipality. From a practical perspective, the challenge is made more complicated by the varying sizes of municipalities and the related imbalance in the resources available to each municipality.

Still, some things can be done to help to reduce the exposure to risk that municipalities experience. Some of these include the following:

1. Procurement orientation for newly-elected councillors

Councillors elected for the first time across Canadian municipalities generally know little about procurement. This is in no way a reflection of their personal professional capabilities. On the contrary, because procurement is a complex area, it is not realistic to expect that elected officials will be well versed in, or even have a passing acquaintance with, the complex web of rules that support the procurement framework in Canada.

A realistic expectation is for elected officials to understand enough to know what steps need to be taken in respect of procurement. To help elected officials meet this expectation, a best practice is for the senior municipal staff to prepare a short program on the fundamentals of procurement at the start of the new mandate. The purpose here is not to make procurement experts out of every newly-elected official. Rather, the goal is to allow the elected body to apply good judment and to take a proactice approach to the municipality’s procurement mandate. A little knowledge on the part of the elected officials can go far in reducing the risk of liability to the municipality.

2. Establishing a centre of expertise

Some municipalities do not internally house the expertise required to run the municipality’s procurement processes. This is a matter that goes well beyond having a purchasing by-law in place. Having a robust and well-considered purchasing by-law is not a trivial matter, but the real risks in procurement arise from the complexity of the issues that arise from the competitive bidding process, and which require a fine balancing of the rights and obligations of the parties. It is therefore important that each municipality allocate the resources required to build up the procurement function.

3. Continuous education of procurement personnel

The personnel performing the procurement function within a municipality must ensure that it is continuously learning and staying abreast of the many developments and requirements in the area.

Continuous education is one thing; broader education is another. The skills set of procurement officers will continue to evolve rapidly. Being competent now means having a grasp of the financial, operational, and stragegic considerations that relate to a procurement process. In addition, because procurement personnel typically have no formal authority over the various business units with which they deal on an ongoing basis, having strong people skills will continue to be an important tool in the procurement officer’s toolkit. The procurement officer of tomorrow will also need to be highly skilled at working with senior executives.

4. Treating procurement as a strategic function

Many believe that municipal procurement activities have historically been suboptimized, in part because the connection between procurement and strategic planning has often not been made. It is fair to say that the private sector is well ahead of the public sector in this area. Many large companies have developed elaborate sourcing strategies that integrate procurement into the overall strategic planning process of the company.

5. Conducting robust annual audits of procurement processes

Thorough annual audits of the procurement process must be conducted to identify the problem areas. That way, improvements can be made, and best practices can be introduced. No audit process will serve any real purpose, however, until a centre of expertise in procurement has been established within the municipality. Obviously, the expertise must be in place internally before standards can be set and audited.

6. Outsourcing the Procurement Function

Even with the best of intentions and commitment, it is unlikely that the smaller municipalities across Canada will ever have the resources required to significantly mitigate procurement risks in an increasingly complex environment. Those municipalities that are operated by part-time councillors who are supported by a dedicated but small band of generalists do not have the critical mass to develop the proficiency that the area requires. For these municipalities, the answer may be to outsource some, if not the bulk of the procurement function.

For these municipalities, the advantages of outsourcing include (a) risk mitigation, through certainty of compliance with the caselaw, (b) cost control, through cost avoidance (in not having to build and maintain a new internal center of expertise, and not having to pay out on successful bid challenges), (c) new value generation, through the dynamics of the competitive bidding process, which leads to the submission of quality, competitive bids, and (d) predictable, fixed costs for the services provided. With outsourcing, the municipality benefits from superior quality services at a fixed price, with much reduced concerns over claims from unsuccessful bidders.

The importance of complying with the procurement caselaw cannot be overstated. The many cases that have appeared before the courts make clear that the consequences for failing to comply can be severe, as each procurement process creates a single successful bidder, and many unsuccessful bidders, whose purpose in submitting a bid was not to participate in a lottery. Having spent time and effort – and sometimes considerable sums of money – in preparing their bids, bidders expect a fair and equal process, conducted in accordance with rules that are both predictable and that they understand. In most cases, the business risks of getting it wrong are not worth the cost savings associated with non-compliance.

Closing comment

Running a business, including a municipality, means having to assume some risks, not just any risks, but risks that are commensurate with the activity being undertaken. By definition, this means that certain controls must be in place to assess the magnitude and the appropriateness of the risks being assumed in the circumstances. In these post-Enron, post-Nortel and post-MFP Inquiry days, nothing less will do. Risk assessement and risk mitigation strategies form an integral part of any sound approach to governance, whether in a publicly-traded company or in a municipality.

Sadly, in municipal procurement in Canada, anecdotal evidence suggests that all too often the appropriate controls are lacking. At times – such as in the tale of my client’s mid-summer municipal debacle – procurement is conducted in ways reminiscent of the far-west, where even those in positions of authority appear not to be aware that rules actually exists.

With the attention that the procurement scandals have brought to the area lately, and with the new demands under section 271 of the Municipal Act, 2001 in Ontario, now then is good time to re-assess the municipality’s procurement risk profile.

Denis Chamberland is a partner with Aird & Berlis LLP, and Vice President, Procurement & Outsourcing Services with ABTS Global LP. He writes a monthly business column on procurement in Municipal World, and is currently writing a book on the fundamentals of procurement for municipally-elected officials in Canada. He can be reached at 416.865.3078 or at


1 [1981] 1 S.C.R. 111, 119 D.L.R. (3d) 267.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.