The Ontario Ministry of the Environment is aggressively
prosecuting blasting firms for flyrock incidents that occurred
years before the Supreme Court decided, last fall, that flyrock
did, after all, have to be reported to the MOE. And now companies
are being convicted and fined for discharging the flyrock at all,
not just for failing to report it to the MOE. This is the next step
on the slippery slope that we feared. If every flyrock discharge
that flies through the air, and does damage, is a
"pollution" offence, what else is? And what
The latest defendant is Austin Powder Ltd., which has been fined
$130,000 after pleading guilty to discharging fly rock from a
quarry blasting site and to failing to report the flyrock
incidents, contrary to the Environmental Protection Act.
Austin Powder Ltd. is a New Brunswick blasting company with an
Ontario office. In 2009, Austin Powder Ltd. provided quarry
blasting services to a company that owns and operates a licensed
limestone quarry near Arnprior, Ontario.
On July 20 and 23, 2009, blasting fly rock was discharged beyond
the control area of 200 metres. In the first incident, a small rock
struck a worker at a neighbouring business on the arm. In the
second incident, rocks were observed flying well beyond the control
area. A scale house located 230 metres from the blast was struck by
a number of rocks. Two vehicles held at a controlled stop along
nearby Young Road on the edge of the quarry property located about
300 metres from the blast were also struck by rock resulting in
extensive damage. There were no injuries. The rocks were not
forthwith reported to the ministry; at the time, the blasting
industry reasonably believed that they did not have to.
The MOE investigator decided that the control zone should have
been 500 metres instead of 200.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Ontario's Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change continues to roll out its Climate Change Action Plan with its proposed GHG guide for projects that are subject to the province's Environmental Assessment Act.
The Imperial Oil refinery pled guilty to one offence for discharging a contaminant, coker stabilizer, thermocracked gas, into the natural environment causing an adverse effect and was fined $650,000...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).