On April 9, 2014, the Québec Superior Court rendered its
highly anticipated judgment in a declaratory judgment proceeding
involving eight of Québec's leading retailers. The
retailers requested that the Court clarify whether their use of a
non-French trademark on storefront signage violated the Charter of
the French Language ("Charter") or its Regulation
respecting the language of commerce and business
The general rule under the Charter for public signs, posters and
commercial advertising provides that they must be in French, or in
French and another language if French is markedly predominant.
Retailers in Québec had been relying on the
"recognized" trademark exception under the Regulation
which specifically provides that a "recognized" trademark
within the meaning of the Trademarks Act may be used
exclusively in a language other than French on public signs,
posters and commercial advertising to display their English-only
marks on outdoor signage.
In contrast, the Office's interpretation of the Charter was
that the use of a trademark on storefront signage would be
considered a business name and thus required to be accompanied by a
French descriptor. As a result, there was a conflict between
the Office's campaign and the exception provided by the
In examining the concepts of trademarks and business names under
applicable federal and provincial laws, the Court opined that a
trademark forms part of a legal concept that is governed by its own
rules and differs significantly from that of a trade name or
business name. Noting that the legislator was well aware of the
distinction between a trademark and a business name, Justice
Yergeau expressed that the Court could not depart from the clear
meaning of the "recognized" trademark exception. The
Court concluded accordingly that retailers could rely on the
"recognized" trademark exception and were not required to
add French descriptors to non-French trademarks featured on
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.
In the inaugural episode of Diversonomics, co-hosts Roberto Aburto and Sarah Willis introduce listeners to the podcast and discuss their experiences with diversity and inclusion in the legal industry. They also outline some of the obstacles the profession faces with respect to adopting new strategies and overhauling old practices.
For episode two of Diversonomics, co-hosts Roberto Aberto and Sarah Willis interview Mark Greenburgh, a partner in Gowling WLG's London office. They discuss the exciting new diversity and inclusion opportunities that have arisen since the combination of Gowlings and Wragge Lawrence Graham, as well at Gowling WLG UK's LGBT OpenHouse initiative.
Mark Greenburgh is a partner in Gowling WLG's London office, with his practice focused on employment litigation. He helps clients find solutions to workplace relationship issues and interpret the special legislation or collective agreements applicable to public sector employees.
Mark is also a Higher Rights Advocate, a Freeman of the City of London, Liveryman of the Worshipful Company of Solicitors, a member of the City of London Employment Law Committee and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts.
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office has issued a report entitled IP Canada Report 2016, discussing trends in IP use domestically, and by Canadians abroad, based on analysis of CIPO's internal data and those collected by the World Intellectual Property Organization.
The value of reliance on a trade-mark registration, as opposed to prior use, stands out sharply in the recent Federal Court of Appeal case of Pizzaiolo Restaurants Inc. v. Les Restaurants La Pizzaiolle Inc. ( 2016 FCA 256 October 28, 2016).
This is an appeal from the Federal Court's decision setting aside the Registrar of Trade-marks decision to the extent that it dismissed the applicant's opposition regarding the mark PIZZAIOLO and Design.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).