Canada: Specialization: Considerations for the Individual Litigator

Last Updated: January 5 2005

Article by Barry Leon and Donna Wannop*

Prepared for the International Bar Association, October 2004.

Introduction

A great deal has been said and written on the subject of specialization in the practice of law. When it comes to litigation, litigators and clients raise strong and persuasive arguments both for and against the pursuit of a specialized practice.

For many litigators, specialization runs contrary to their inherent desire and self-image – often born in their law school days – to be the all-round litigator (barrister/counsel/advocate). They strive to develop the skills of a truly great advocate. And after all, many legends of the courtroom were generalists; their specialty was advocacy. So these litigators believe, and in many cases correctly, that once briefed on any type of matter, they can apply their talents as a litigator to that case. They can learn the narrow subject matter of the case in intimate detail, and then when the case is over, they can clear their heads of the matter and move on to the next one. They do not want to narrow their practices because they fear missing out on different types of interesting cases.

Notwithstanding the traditional approach to litigation, it is impossible to ignore the market factors that are exerting increasing pressure on litigation lawyers to specialize.

There is an increasing need for litigators to plan their careers, to have shorter- and longer-term objectives, and to develop and implement tactics to achieve these objectives. Planning involves making choices – deciding what he or she does not want in a career and eliminating certain paths. The more that is eliminated, the greater the concentration of the litigator’s practice. In the final analysis, whether specialization is the right way to go depends on a range of factors, in particular, the market in question, the firm in question and the individual lawyer who is making the decision.

Whether to specialize may not, however, be the real question. The real question, at least for some litigators, may be the extent to which he or she should specialize. Traditionally, litigators have specialized geographically, often more so than transactional lawyers, because of appearance rights in courts, licensing restrictions, and differences in legal systems and in court procedures and cultures. Litigators have also specialized by broad areas of the law: civil, labour, family/matrimonial and commercial. More recently, litigators’ specialization has come to mean, at least in some jurisdictions, both industry specialization (e.g., telecom, construction, securities dealers) and narrower bands within a specialty such as commercial law. Examples of these commercial bands include tax, securities, trade and bankruptcy.

This paper provides an overview of the factors that individual litigators may want to consider in deciding whether, how much and how to specialize. The primary focus is on the individual lawyer, and his or her decision-making processes. Client and market perceptions on specialization, and the firm’s strategic decisions about specialization, will constrain and influence the individual lawyer’s decision making about his or her career.

What Does Specialization Mean?

Litigation is itself a specialty. That is so whether or not the litigator’s practice includes advocacy in court . By specialization, we are talking about a further narrowing and focus of the litigator’s practice. The extent of this specialization can vary. It could mean focusing solely on one aspect of a litigator’s function in the particular jurisdiction. Or it could mean developing a depth of knowledge, experience and profile in one thing, but involving only part of the litigator’s time. Depending on the nature of that thing, the litigator may have the capacity to develop more than one focus.

The litigator might increase his or her concentration in one area over time. Or the litigator might shift focuses over time.

Specialization does not necessarily mean focusing on the most complex or the most profitable area. One could specialize in any type of work, industry or law by getting more experience than the average litigator and a reputation in that type of work, industry or law.

Why Specialize?

Interest

One reason that some litigators specialize is that they have an interest in the particular subject matter or industry. As part of the career planning process, a litigator will want to choose a focus or specialty that he or she is especially interested in.

Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness

Clients look increasingly for efficiency and cost-effectiveness. They want their matters to be dealt with and resolved quickly. With high quality among law firms assumed and all other things usually assumed to be equal (apart perhaps from price), clients seek to minimize the time and other costly resources that their outside counsel apply to their matters. Experience with specific industries or businesses, or with specific matters, is seen to make litigation lawyers efficient. Relevant experience also creates efficiencies at the client end: retaining a lawyer with experience in the relevant area means the client will need to spend less time explaining and familiarizing the lawyer with the business and the regulatory environment. The lawyer who is familiar with the client’s industry, with the relevant legislation and regulations, and with the kinds of legal and business issues facing companies that operate in the specific environment in which the client operates will be perceived as more efficient than a lawyer who does not have that same experience and background.

Better Marketing Strategy and Differentiation

Specialization facilitates the development of a focused marketing strategy. It enables the litigator to identify clearly defined market segments with specific needs. Targeting clearly and narrowly defined markets makes it easier to develop positioning strategies, communication strategies and tactical marketing plans.

Specialization also offers other marketing advantages: it provides a litigator with a basis on which to distinguish himself or herself from other litigators. Increasingly, one of the main criteria that clients apply when selecting litigation lawyers is specialized expertise – it constitutes a tangible differentiator. Clients in general, and potential clients in particular (who are not yet in a position to evaluate the "experiential" aspects of the lawyer’s client service), have considerable difficulty recognizing and appreciating other differences between competing lawyers and firms (apart from such things as price).

Reduced Risk

The individual at the client organization who is responsible for selecting an outside litigator is personally at risk in making the litigator-hiring decision. If things go badly, that person will need to explain why that happened and why a litigator with experience and a reputation in the field was not retained – if in fact such a litigator was not retained.

To minimize the risk, most people tend to select a litigator with specialized expertise and – perhaps even more important – with a reputation for having that expertise. There is an assumption that a specialist is likely to do a better job than a generalist. This is especially true for a specialist who has a well-established reputation in the specific area in question. Selecting a specialist allows the decision maker to protect himself or herself – particularly important if it turns out that the result is unfavourable or the matter is somehow mismanaged by the lawyer retained.

The Importance of Profile

Marketing poses unique challenges for litigators, who frequently have limited success with some of the more traditional marketing strategies that tend to work well for transactional lawyers. Most litigators have considerable difficulty identifying potential sources of new work. Individuals and businesses cannot generally predict or anticipate their litigation needs, and therefore, litigators typically cannot identify potential clients with any degree of certainty. As a result, strategies that revolve around strengthening relationships with past and current clients, and cultivating new relationships with potential clients may offer relatively low returns.

Given that there may be a limit on how much work a general litigator can generate by focusing on cultivating relationships with clients, developing a profile takes on an added significance for the litigator. Profile and reputation can prompt a potential client to contact a litigator when the need arises and to hire the litigator once interviewed. It is easier to develop a profile if the litigator is associated with a specialized area of practice.

Generating More Referrals

For the reasons discussed above, litigators sometimes have difficulty generating work directly from clients, and often rely more heavily on generating work indirectly – that is, through referrals.

Most professionals are more inclined to refer other professionals whom they do not regard as their competitors, and lawyers are no exception. The more narrowly a litigator defines his or her practice – in other words, the greater the degree of specialization – the broader the base of potential referral sources, other litigators included.

More In-House Counsel

In most industries and businesses, there is an escalating trend toward establishing and growing in-house legal departments. In-house counsel are typically responsible for managing legal issues and allocating work to outside law firms when appropriate and required (i.e., usually when the work cannot be done internally). In-house counsel increasingly handle general and more routine matters – including litigation – internally, looking outside only when the stakes are high, when issues are unusual, when matters are complex or when matters require greater resources than are available internally. In these circumstances, it makes sense for the in-house lawyer to seek a specialist.

Location Less Important

As noted earlier, geography has historically defined the way most litigators specialize. But technology, transportation, the expansion of international arbitration and the globalization of corporate clients may have changed the historical market definitions for litigators. A litigator in a small town can have a global practice in a narrow field of expertise. Certainly it is easier to do today than even a few short years ago. Location may not be nearly as important as it once was. By concentrating, at least in certain kinds of practices, the litigator’s geographic market may broaden.

More Money

In some fields, a litigator can command higher fees simply by being a specialist. Enhanced profitability could be a driver toward specialization. However, in some fields, specialization is part of the "table stakes" – the litigator needs to be a specialist to be in the game, for example, for insurance defence work. In other fields, specialization may produce volume advantages (and profitability advantages), but not necessarily higher rates.

Competitive Trends

The general trend that increasingly favours law firms and lawyers with specialized expertise means that the bar is continually being raised and that litigators who do not have a specialization are more often competing against those who do – both in the marketplace and in court.

But What About …

Lost Opportunities

It is certainly true that specialization will result in missed opportunities for attractive, interesting and profitable work that falls outside the scope of the litigator’s specialty. This may happen by chance or by design: an opportunity may be lost because the potential client doesn’t perceive the specialist to be an appropriate or a qualified choice for work outside his or her known area of expertise, or the specialist may decide to decline work outside his or her chosen area. The question is whether the development of more work and better work in the designated area outweighs the resulting lost opportunities.

Greater Vulnerability and Dependency

A specialist is more vulnerable than a generalist. Without the advantages of a mixed book of litigation business, the practice of a specialist can disappear literally overnight for reasons well beyond the litigator’s control. This may happen as a result of any number of things: for example, major developments or changes in the economy or in the relevant industry, or changes in (or the repeal of) relevant legislation and regulatory regimes. Developments at competing law firms and indeed within the lawyer’s own firm may also have a profound impact on a specialist’s practice.

Difficulties Associated with Shifting the Practice

Nothing is forever, and what is considered a viable area of specialization may lose its appeal over time. The specialist’s interests may change, or, as discussed above, the specialty may no longer be viable or profitable to pursue. Whatever the reason, if the litigator who specializes decides to make a change, it will be more difficult to shift out of one specialty area into another, or for that matter into a more general litigation practice, than it would be to shift from a general practice into a more specialized area.

Developing Advocacy Skills

In jurisdictions where litigators are advocates in court, a litigator must develop advocacy skills. That fundamental fact has implications for specialization. It means that the litigator needs to first build a solid base of advocacy skills. A possible occupational hazard of specializing – especially specializing too early in one’s career – may be that advocacy skills are not well-developed.

Having a Broader World View

If everyone working on a matter is a specialist, who is thinking about the totality? And how does the advocate develop a broad understanding of legal principles and theories, and the ability to apply the wisdom of one area to another? These are not insignificant considerations.

Can You Have It All?

Being an expert in most areas does not have to become a full-time commitment. It takes less concentration to be, and to be regarded as, a specialist in a small market than in a large one. Depending on the litigator’s jurisdiction and market size, it may be possible to be an expert, and to have a reputation as such, without full-time dedication to the area. This model may enable a litigator to attain many of the benefits of specialization, while minimizing the downside that may come with a specialized practice.

Conclusion

The advantages and disadvantages associated with specialization must be weighed in each case by the individual lawyer. Not all practices support specialization, and not all lawyers are suited to specialized practice. Although clients increasingly look for specialized expertise, and more firms support and encourage the development of specialty practice areas, litigators are the last holdouts, and many continue to maintain their reluctance to restrict their practices. Traditional reluctance notwithstanding, it would be prudent for any litigator operating in today’s practice environment to give some serious consideration to specialization on an ongoing basis.

Footnotes

* Barry Leon is a partner at Torys LLP in Toronto. He practises business litigation and dispute resolution, including complex commercial and corporate litigation, and international and domestic arbitration. Torys LLP is an international business law firm with more than 330 lawyers in its Toronto and New York offices. More information can be found at www.torys.com.

Donna Wannop is a leading Canadian specialist in law firm marketing. She provides marketing consulting and coaching to lawyers and law firms in all areas of practice. Donna is a Canadian lawyer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions