A supervisor employed by J.R Contracting Services Inc. is paying
a heavy price after being convicted for failing to ensure workers
used fall protection, contrary to the Occupational Health and
Safety Act ("OHSA") and its regulations. On
March 6, 2014, the Company was fined $75,000 for its violations and
a Company representative was fined $2,000 for obstructing a
Ministry of Labour investigation. The Company supervisor, however,
was given a 45 day jail sentence.
In its decision of April 18, 2013, the Court found that the
Company had sent workers to remove shingles from a residential
roof. While doing so, one worker slipped off the roof, falling onto
the walkway below. He was not wearing any protective devices and it
was found that there was no fall protection equipment at the
accident scene. The worker suffered paralysis below the waist.
The Court further found that a company employee responsible for
directing workers to the job sites, paying the workers, and
providing them with cash advances when needed, was a
"supervisor" with authority over the workers. She would
also authorize workers to proceed on particular projects, thereby
demonstrating "hands on authority." The Court concluded
that the supervisor failed to ensure workers used the protective
devices, measures and procedures as required by the OHSA.
Jail sentences are rare. As a public welfare statute,
enforcement of the OHSA has generally focussed on fines as a
deterrent to negligent action by employers and supervisors, and
courts have often stressed the lesser "stigma" associated
with conviction compared to criminal offences. The imposition of a
significant jail sentence in this case, however, calls into
question whether jail time will no longer be reserved for the most
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.
From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.
Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.
Unfortunately, reasonable accommodation for employees in the workplace continues to be the source of significant litigation and even today we continue to see outrageous examples of employers behaving badly.
We are now beginning to see reported cases involving charges and subsequent fines laid against employers for failing to provide information, instruction and supervision to protect a worker from workplace violence.
On October 13, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal an Ontario Court of Appeal decision which ordered an employer to pay a former employee 37 months of salary and benefits following termination.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).