In 2009, the CRA commenced a broad review of the
non-profit organization sector. You or your clients may
have received a CRA questionnaire asking that the NPO provide
information or documents in respect of its structure, activities,
bylaws, finances, and membership.
Generally, NPOs have been exempt from tax in Canada since the
introduction of the income tax in 1917. Under paragraph 149(1)(l)
of the Income Tax Act, no Part I tax is payable by a club, society
or association that is not a charity, is organized and operated for
any purpose other than profit, and no part of the income of which
is payable to any proprietor, member or shareholder. Currently,
there may be up to 80,000 NPOs in Canada that qualify for the
tax exemption under paragraph 149(1)(l). Prior to 2009, the CRA had
not undertaken a general review of this sector.
Recently, the CRA published a report and Q&A on the Non-Profit Organization Risk
Identification Project (NPORIP). In its report, the CRA stated the
review revealed that many NPOs would fail to meet at least one
of the requirements set out in paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Act:
The NPORIP was designed to provide the CRA with insight into
the way certain organizations—those seeking an exemption from
tax under paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Act—operate under the
income tax rules. The NPORIP has given the CRA a better
understanding of the issues these organizations face in complying
with the Act, and, in particular, has highlighted a number of
areas where the non-profit sector's understanding of the law
differs from that of the CRA. In addition, the NPORIP has revealed
a significant issue with compliance by these organizations in
several key areas.
The report provides only a high-level summary of its findings,
none of which are surprising:
The NPORIP identified a small number of cases where the NPO
was, in fact, a charity;
The NPORIP identified a small number of cases where the
NPO's governing documents (such as articles of incorporation,
letters patent, and by-laws) indicated that it was
not organized exclusively for a purpose other than
The NPORIP noted a variety of activities with apparent profit
motives carried out by a wide range of NPOs; and
The NPORIP identified a small number of cases where the NPO had
income payable or made available for the personal benefit of a
proprietor, member, or shareholder.
The report states that the CRA will seek to improve its
education and outreach in the NPO sector, so as to increase
awareness and compliance. Additionally, the CRA indicated that a
copy of the report had been provided to the Department of Finance
for the purpose of reviewing the NPO legislative framework.
We don't think the report is the final word on this issue
from either the CRA or the Department of Finance. In fact, in its
2014 federal budget, the Department of Finance stated:
... Budget 2014 announces the Government's intention to
review whether the income tax exemption for NPOs remains properly
targeted and whether sufficient transparency and accountability
provisions are in place. This review will not extend to registered
charities or registered Canadian amateur athletic associations. As
part of the review, the Government will release a consultation
paper for comment and will further consult with stakeholders
We expect that future legislative changes (i.e., increased
reporting requirements) may be forthcoming in the next few
Dentons is a global firm driven to provide you with the
competitive edge in an increasingly complex and interconnected
marketplace. We were formed by the March 2013 combination of
international law firm Salans LLP, Canadian law firm Fraser Milner
Casgrain LLP (FMC) and international law firm SNR Denton.
Dentons is built on the solid foundations of three highly
regarded law firms. Each built its outstanding reputation and
valued clientele by responding to the local, regional and national
needs of a broad spectrum of clients of all sizes –
individuals; entrepreneurs; small businesses and start-ups; local,
regional and national governments and government agencies; and
mid-sized and larger private and public corporations, including
international and global entities.
Now clients benefit from more than 2,500 lawyers and
professionals in 79 locations in 52 countries across Africa, Asia
Pacific, Canada, Central Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Russia and
the CIS, the UK and the US who are committed to challenging the
status quo to offer creative, actionable business and legal
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to
this article should be addressed directly to the author.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Join our partners Karen Martin and Ryan Chalmers at the Pacific Business & Law Institute’s program, where they will be presenting a session titled "Procurement: Compliance with AIT, NWPTA, TILMA, NAFTA, TPP, CETA and the Statutes." This forum assembles leading government advisors to provide insights on key issues in local government today.
The billionaire co-founder of Facebook, the only American member of Monty Python, a Civil Rights Leader with a Ph.D. from Harvard, the founder of Carnival Cruise Lines and owner of the Miami Heat NBA franchise, . . .
With the 2017 federal budget likely due to be released in late February or March, there is speculation that the government may curtail the preferential tax treatment afforded to gains on the disposition of capital property
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).