The Quebec Labour Standards Commission has found that simply acquiring leasehold interests does not necessarily mean the acquiring company is a successor employer.

In January 2011, Target Canada Co. made its entry into Canada by acquiring the leasehold interests of 220 Zellers locations, with approximately 150 leases ultimately being retained across the country. Following this transaction, Zellers ceased the majority of its Quebec operations in December 2012. Target opened its first stores in Quebec in September 2013 after extensive renovations to the Zellers locations.  

A successor employer?

As reported in the media, during the summer of 2013 a number of former Zellers employees filed unjust dismissal complaints against Target with the Quebec Labour Standards Commission (Commission) after receiving letters confirming they had not been hired by Target during its job fairs.

These claims were based on the premise that Target was a successor employer: under various legislation regarding employment and labour standards, the sale, in whole or in part, of a business from one employer to another does not put an end to the existing employment relationships. The employees took the position that Target, having acquired Zellers' leasehold interests, was the successor employer of Zellers and its decision not to hire them was tantamount to an unjust dismissal.  

Under the Act respecting labour standards, an employee with over two years of uninterrupted service with the same employer can file a complaint if he or she believes that he or she has been not dismissed for just and sufficient cause. If successful before the Quebec Labour Relations Board (QLRB), the tribunal which decides if the dismissal was made for just and sufficient cause, the employee can seek to be reinstated in his or her former position.

As in all cases, the Commission must first determine whether the complaint is admissible before referring the matter to the QLRB. In order to assess the admissibility of the complaints, the Commission verified whether the complainants:

  • had worked for the same employer for at least two years;
  • were employees as defined by the Act respecting labour standards;
  • worked for an employer falling under provincial jurisdiction;
  • did not have an equivalent recourse under a collective agreement or other law; and,
  • filed their complaints in the 45 days following their alleged dismissal.

Commission's findings

Following its analysis of the complaints and file, in the fall of 2013 the Commission determined the complaints were inadmissible. Indeed, it concluded there was no evidence that Target continued or had the intention of continuing Zellers' business. In other words, there was no indication Target was the successor employer of Zellers.

The complainants did not request a reconsideration of the Commission's decision and as such, Target has since received confirmation that the Commission has closed its file in the matter. Therefore, the QLRB will not hear this matter.

The Commission's position is in line with a recent decision rendered by the British Columbia Labour Relations Board, whereby Target was not deemed a successor employer for labour relations purposes of a Zellers establishment carrying on a business at the Brentwood Mall in Burnaby, BC. In light of these outcomes, it would certainly seem that the simple acquisition of leasehold interests does not trigger the application of successorship rights.  

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members ('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.