Canada: Recent Lessons In Preparing For And Responding To Security Breaches

As an alternative to resolving issues before the courts, parties frequently include dispute resolution clauses in their commercial contracts setting out how certain issues or potential disputes will be resolved and by whom. These clauses often take the form of an arbitration agreement, pursuant to which all disputes arising under a contract (or, in some cases, certain specified disputes) will be decided by one or more arbitrators to the exclusion of the courts. In some cases, however, parties agree that an issue will be determined by a third-party decision maker, who is acting as an "expert" (such as an appraiser or accountant who has expertise in a particular area), as opposed to an arbitrator. These clauses, commonly referred to as expert determination clauses, often involve a specific, technical or financial issue, such as, for example, establishing the fair market value of an interest in real estate, the appropriate method for calculating a post-closing purchase price adjustment, or determining whether goods supplied comply with contractual specifications. While arbitration agreements and expert determination clauses may have similar features, they do not have the same legal effects.

Differences Between Arbitration and Expert Determination

Under both Québec and Ontario law, the distinction between an arbitration agreement and an expert determination clause is an important one. The provisions governing arbitration in Québec and Ontario do not apply to an expert determination which leads to a number of important differences. First, these provisions grant important procedural rights to parties involved in an arbitration (as opposed to expert determination), such as the opportunity to present their case and to respond to the opposing party. A party may also require the arbitrator to hold a hearing, and arbitrations are governed by specific rules with respect to, for example, evidence at hearings and notice of facts and opinions. In contrast, an expert is only required to abide by the terms of the contractual agreement and is not bound by the same obligations as an arbitrator.1

Second, these provisions significantly limit the grounds for challenging an arbitration award, including by generally precluding a court from inquiring into the merits of the dispute that has been arbitrated. It is also, generally, easier and quicker to have an arbitral award recognized (which is done by way of a motion) for purposes of enforcement and it is very difficult for a dissatisfied party to successfully challenge an arbitral award. In contrast, a disagreement between the parties over an expert's determination pursuant to the terms of a contract would typically involve a longer process, including the filing of an action before the courts claiming breach of contract. In particular, a court will generally only interfere with an expert determination where an expert failed to comply with their mandate as determined by the terms of the contract.

Finally, arbitrators benefit from immunity with respect to their decisions; experts do not.

Factors to Consider

Considering the differences above, when drafting clauses in commercial agreements that involve a third-party decision maker it is important to be aware of the factors that will be applied by the courts when determining whether the decision maker(s) was/were acting as an "arbitrator" or "expert".

The following factors — though not exhaustive or conclusive — have been identified by the Supreme Court of Canada (the "SCC"),2 and are applied by the courts across Canada when considering whether a third-party decision maker was acting as an arbitrator pursuant to an arbitration agreement, or as an expert.

  • Is there a dispute or disagreement between the parties?
  • A submission to arbitration necessarily requires the existence of an existing or potential dispute. This is not the case for an expert determination.

  • What function is the third party exercising?
  • In general terms, the greater the similarity with the judicial process — which includes the rights of parties to be heard, to argue, to present evidence, the presence of lawyers at a hearing, the rendering of detailed reasons, etc. — the greater the likelihood that reference to a third party will be characterized as arbitration. Conversely, a process whereby the decision maker either makes a determination pursuant to his/her own knowledge or expertise or based on a unilateral investigation conducted outside of the presence of the parties is more consistent with an expert determination.

  • Is the decision final and binding?
  • While this criterion is not exclusive to arbitration, it may be an indication that the parties contemplated arbitration. It is also important to note that while it is relevant and advisable to use the word "arbitration" (assuming that this is what the parties intended) the use of "arbitration", in and of itself, is not conclusive as to the parties' intentions.

By way of illustration, the Québec Court of Appeal (the "QCA") recently considered the issue of arbitrator vs. expert in Eacom Timber Corporation vs. Domtar Inc.3 and maintained a decision of the Québec Superior Court (the "QSC") which held that the clause in issue constituted an arbitration agreement. In Eacom Timber, the parties disagreed over the purchase price payable by Eacom pursuant to an asset purchase agreement, which was subject to adjustment based on a post-closing determination of working capital. The agreement included a clause that dealt with the resolution for calculating working capital and the parties disagreed with respect to the nature of such clause. The clause in question provided, in summary, that if a dispute arose between the parties over the working capital calculation, an accounting firm identified in the agreement (defined as the "Accountants") was to make a "final determination [...] which shall be binding on the parties". The clause in question also provided that: (1) the Accountants had to provide the parties the opportunity to explain their position with respect to the dispute and each party had the right to an oral hearing with the Accountants; and (2) the Accountants were instructed to only resolve the "Disputed Matters" and "not to otherwise investigate any matters independently".

Domtar maintained that the dispute resolution clause constituted an arbitration agreement, whereas Eacom argued that pursuant to such clause, which did not contain the word "arbitration", the parties submitted their dispute to an expert, not an arbitrator. Interestingly, another section of the asset purchase agreement, which applied to other disputes under the agreement, clearly constituted an arbitration agreement as defined in the Civil Code of Québec (the "CCQ"). Eacom relied on, among other things, the foregoing fact and argued that when the parties intended to execute an arbitration agreement, they had clearly done so under their agreement.

In first instance, the QSC dismissed Eacom's arguments and held that the clause in issue contained all of the essential elements of an arbitration agreement, which is to be interpreted broadly, as defined under the CCQ. The QSC relied on the fact that: (1) the clause in question referred to "Disputed Matters", which was an essential element of an arbitration agreement and which distinguished such an agreement from a clause which merely sought an expert opinion; (2) referred the dispute to a third party (i.e., an accounting firm); (3) the decision of the Accountants was final and binding; and (4) the arbitration agreement was evidenced in writing.

On appeal, the QCA upheld the decision of the QSC on the basis that: (1) the QSC's findings were based on a clearly identified dispute under the asset purchase agreement; and (2) the QSC sought the true intention of the parties with respect to the role of the third-party decision maker and properly applied the criteria established by the SCC in Sport Maska in doing so.


When executing commercial agreements that involve a third-party decision maker, it is important for parties to keep in mind the principles set out in Sport Maska. While distinguishing between an arbitration agreement and an expert determination clause may not always be clear- cut, the use of the term "arbitration" or "expertise", though not conclusive, is advisable. Another useful drafting tip, if the parties intend to be governed by an arbitration agreement, is to include a reference in the dispute resolution clause to the dispute being resolved pursuant to the arbitral provisions of a provincial legislation, the rules of an administered arbitral body, or one of a number of different ad hoc arbitration rules. While each clause will ultimately be considered based on its own terms, parties should be aware that, generally, the closer the similarity between the process they have chosen and a judicial process, the greater the likelihood that the clause in question will be viewed as an arbitration agreement.


1 Cummings v. Solutia SDO Ltd., [2008] O.J. No. 3259 (S.C.J. [Commercial List]) at para. 43, aff'd by 2009 ONCA 510.

2 See Sport Maska Inc. v. Zittrer, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 564 ("Sport Maska").

3 C.A.M. No. 500-09-023813-132, 17 January 2014 ("Eacom Timber").

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions