Canada: Model Pension Law Proposed For Canada

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Pension & Employee Benefits-August 2004

The Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities (CAPSA) has released its Proposed Regulatory Principles for a Model Pension Law, offering solutions to the burdensome and costly administration of multi-jurisdictional pension plans, and calling for an updated Memorandum of Reciprocal Agreement.

Multi-jurisdictional pension plans are an important aspect of Canada’s benefits landscape. According to Statistics Canada, 2,784 private sector pension plans (23% of all private sector plans, other than those registered with the federal Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions) had members in more than one province as of 2002. Over 1,000 of these plans had more than a million members in five or more provinces.

The application of the Memorandum of Reciprocal Agreement – a 1968 inter-jurisdictional convention facilitating the administration and regulation of plans with members in more than one jurisdiction – was recently called into question by the Leco decision. While many may be skeptical about the "quick" adoption of a Model Law in all Canadian jurisdictions, going through the exercise of creating one allows for a healthy examination and comment on the problems in today’s pension legislation.

CAPSA’s Proposed Model Law: A Commentary

CAPSA has proposed a two-step approach to resolving the difficulties faced by multi-jurisdictional pension plans. Namely:

ONE. Revise and Update the Reciprocal Agreement: The Agreement is dated and unclear, and CAPSA is already working on a revised version as an interim measure until a model law can be implemented. That version will not, however, address the larger issue of how best to streamline administration of multi-jurisdictional pension plans for the longer term.

TWO. Develop a Model Pension Law Proposal: CAPSA proposes regulatory principles for a model pension law for federal and provincial jurisdictions based on the following objectives:

(a) Set minimum pension standards;

(b) Provide maximum flexibility, simplicity and clarity;

(c) Streamline requirements and avoid over-regulation; and

(d) Ensure effective harmonization.

While the Model Law harmonizes many current practices without significant changes, a number of the proposals diverge from the existing standards and may be controversial.

"Final Location". Principle 2 clarifies entitlements of plan members who have accrued benefits in two or more jurisdictions by proposing a "final location" approach for calculating benefits upon termination of employment, retirement or death. Benefits would be calculated using laws of the jurisdiction in which a member last accrued benefits, rather than the "checkerboard" approach that requires a plan administrator to look at the service of an individual in each jurisdiction and apply that law to the relevant portion of the individual’s service. This has been the approach adopted by most regulators in the past, although Imperial Oil was recently challenged in Ontario. (That case was settled.)

Prior Notice of Amendments. Principle 4 proposes administrators provide notice of an amendment to the pension plan to all members and any collective bargaining agent representing members "within the prescribed period of time" before the effective date of the amendment. This type of notice could not simply be deferred until the annual statement and, since it does not impose any member or regulatory consent requirement, it may be seen as more of an annoyance. The Model Law is also unclear what the time period will be.

Plan Administrator. Principle 5 proposes the administrator for a pension plan that is not a multi-employer pension plan or "prescribed plan" (that is, a small pension plan, a plan whose administrator is appointed by the regulatory authority or a plan exempted by the regulatory authority) must be a pension committee with at least two members designated by plan members – one by active members and another by non-active members. The plan may also provide for other members to be designated, usually by the employer. Based on the experience in Québec, pension committees would likely end up having a majority of three or more members designated by the employer, who would retain the authority to determine the provisions of the plan. The experience in Québec has not been positive. Pension plan sponsors question the utility of a committee whose employee representatives can always be outvoted. In addition, concern over liability has also led some members to refuse to become pension committee members. The view of labour unions appears to be that there is not sufficient value in the pension committee to accept any "diminution" in the member rights in support of harmonization. This principle should be reconsidered by CAPSA.

Contribution Holidays. Principle 8 states that an employer may take a contribution holiday according to the terms of the pension plan and the requirements prescribed under the pension legislation. The proposed principles do not indicate whether it will simply be the most recent plan terms, which govern the right to take contribution holidays, or historical terms. Experience has clearly indicated that an analysis of historical terms may lead to litigation since prior legislative and administrative requirements may have ambiguous language. It would be preferable to have a legislative override to plan provisions in the area of contribution holidays. Such a provision would, though, be controversial with members.

Vesting. Principle 15 proposes all pension benefits be vested immediately for all plan members’ service and that vesting be retroactive.There would be an absolute cost and administrative burden to this proposal. Many employers might be willing to accept the cost of immediate vesting because of the proposed elimination of partial plan wind-ups. However, employers might solve the administrative cost of immediate vesting by changes to the eligibility rules.

Phased Retirement. Principle 17 provides the option for plan members to opt to take an early reduced pension benefit where an active member and employer have agreed on a reduction of the active member’s hours of employment. The proposals suggest an active member who elects to be paid a partial pension continue to accrue benefits under the pension plan. There is some uncertainty as to how those additional benefits would be determined. The existing Québec and Alberta rules regarding phased retirement, for example, are not acceptable to some. There is also a strong view that administrative complexity in this area should be avoided or else employers will be discouraged from entering into such arrangements.

Pension Splitting. Principle 22 allows benefits to be paid to the spouse or former spouse of the member in the event of a divorce or separation, including an amount in excess of 50% of the pension, if so ordered by a court. Some maintain this produces a costly and complex exercise in most jurisdictions for the member and spouse, and for the plan, exacerbated by different definitions of spouse, and the distinction between rights of property equalization and support obligations under family law in the provinces. There must be clarification and uniformity. CIA officially supports deferred settlement. Some employers, however, prefer immediate settlement for ease of administration and finality of settlement between spouses. Deferred pension could then be offered as an option under the plan if the employers wish and the rules are clear.

Sale of Business & Successor Pension Plans. Principles 25 and 26 suggest the current rules continue. However, integration of these rules with the elimination of the partial plan wind-up provision will require clarity. That is, will there really be no effect where, on a sale of a business, a successor employer refuses to provide a pension plan for the "transferred employees"?

Conversion and Division of Pension Plans. Principle 27 simply states that the merger of two or more pension plans "is subject to the prescribed conditions and the authorization of the regulatory authority." No guidance is provided as to what the prescribed conditions will be. Given the Financial Services Commission of Ontario’s virtual moratorium on pension plan mergers, it is vitally important to understand what mergers will be acceptable. It is not an overstatement to say that, to the extent the regulatory authorities impose conditions upon mergers that effectively prohibit plan mergers, negative consequences to pension plan continuance and funding are likely. The Model Law is equally vague as to what is required to convert a pension plan. Again, clarity is required and conversions should be permitted if voluntary pension plans are to be promoted. Also, harmonization on conversion conditions should be established. For example, it does not seem fair in a national pension plan that some members, such as those in Québec and Nova Scotia, get benefits on a projected basis while others do not.

Commuted Values on Involuntary Termination. Principle 29 states that, where a member terminates from a plan as a result of events not initiated by the member, the member’s benefits should be calculated as prescribed. CAPSA says it "welcomes comments and suggestions regarding the calculation of members’ commuted values on sale of business, plan termination and plan conversion". While it is not entirely clear what it intends, CAPSA suggests that in light of the elimination of partial plan wind-up another form of enhanced benefits should be provided. This seems misguided. A form of severance should not be enacted through a voluntary pension system, but rather through employment standards legislation.

Unlocatable Beneficiaries on Plan Wind Up. Principle 32 provides that, where assets remain in a terminated plan and the administrator is unable to distribute to the appropriate beneficiaries after making reasonable efforts to do so, the outstanding amount will be referred to a public agency. This proposal would be helpful if such a public agency existed in every jurisdiction, but it does not. The Public Trustee in Ontario, for example, has been reluctant to hold funds for unlocatable beneficiaries. A more practical suggestion might be for the plan sponsor to hold the funds or hire someone to do so on their behalf, and have obligations to make attempts to locate beneficiaries at retirement age.

Partial Wind Up. Since the Model Law proposes immediate vesting of all benefits, the concept of a partial wind up is proposed to be eliminated (Principle 32).Without a partial windup requirement, the considerations in the recent Monsanto Canada case become unnecessary. One can expect labour to oppose this change vigorously because of surplus issues alone. Plan sponsors, on the other hand, will likely see this as the most beneficial provision of the Model Law.

Surplus Withdrawal. Principle 33 states that any proposal for a surplus withdrawal by an employer from an ongoing or terminated pension plan must have the agreement of at least two thirds of the active and non-active members of the pension plan, or the consent of collective bargaining agents. The provisions move to a surplus-sharing regime with no entitlement option. This may draw resistance from both sides of the industry, sponsors and members. The proposals also provide the same surplus-sharing regime will apply to ongoing and plan terminations. This is a liberalization of access to surplus. Labour is likely to react negatively to this liberalization. The provisions also provide that if no surplus application is received within the prescribed time period that the matter can be sent to arbitration. No details are provided on the time period to be prescribed and, more importantly, the basis upon which the arbitrator will decide. That is, will it be legal entitlement-based, contribution-based, etc.? To understand the viability of this proposal it is necessary to understand these details. The principles also propose if no arrangement is reached and no request for arbitration is made within a prescribed time period, the surplus will be deemed to be owned by the members. This would seem to be an ineffective provision that will simply mean that time will be watched, and where necessary talks will be halted, and the matter will be sent to arbitration. This does not seem helpful.

Surplus in Mergers and Sales. Principle 33 also leaves open for discussion how surplus will be dealt with in plan mergers and business sales. We suggest the current rules in Ontario, prior to the confusion surrounding the Transamerica case, should be retained. That is, in a merger, the surplus can be used in the merged plan as long as the pension plans do not prohibit. In a sale of a business, a pro-rata to liabilities transfer of surplus is permitted and a greater transfer of surplus is treated as a surplus withdrawal.

Power of Regulatory Authority. Principle 35 grants the regulatory authority the power to require the administrator to hold a meeting of plan members or other beneficiaries, and to assess regulated persons for regulatory activities on a user-pay basis. It is unclear what meetings are anticipated and what additional fees are being contemplated.

Rule-Making. Principle 37, in an effort to streamline the regulation making process, grants the regulatory authority the ability to make rules governing matters of a technical or administrative nature, which have the force and effect of a regulation, subject to Ministerial oversight. The Model Law also envisions a role for CAPSA in rule-making to encourage harmonization. To the extent that notice and comment provisions provide safeguards, this would seem useful. The political sensitivity of pension plan changes seems to result in even the most procedural of amendments being lost in the political quagmire.

Reporting by Advisors. Principle 40 aims to clarify the duties of advisors. The principles propose persons retained or employed by the administrator must report to the regulatory authority any material contravention of the pension legislation or regulation that is not corrected by the administrator. The question of who must report "material contraventions" and what matters must be reported, needs to be answered before it is possible to consider this proposal.

Review of the Act. Principle 46 proposes that every five years, the regulatory authority shall undertake a review of the Act and regulation to ensure the continuing effectiveness and harmonization of pension legislation across Canada. This seems valuable, but the question is whether there is the political will needed to make the changes that a review uncovers. It should also be noted that a major omission from the Model Law is any consideration of issues relevant only to defined contribution arrangements. The next draft of the proposals, hopefully, will correct this significant deficiency. The Model Law offers an interesting opportunity to streamline pension plan administration and "solve" many of the difficulties in pension plans in Canada. A number of the proposed Principles, however, require significant expansion before they can be considered.

A copy of the CAPSA proposals can be found at 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.