Canada: B.C. Court Of Appeal Stays Away From The Physician-Assisted Suicide Debate

In a 2-1 decision, British Columbia's highest court recently upheld the federal ban on physician-assisted suicide. The ruling overturned the June, 2012 B.C. Supreme Court decision in Taylor and Carter et al. v. A.G. of Canada which struck down 241(b) of the Criminal Code prohibiting assisting another person to commit suicide.

To summarize the lower court's decision, the Plaintiffs, both of whom suffered from intractable and progressive diseases, brought a civil claim challenging the constitutionality of a series of Criminal Code provisions dealing with assisted suicide and euthanasia. This was in spite of the fact that in 1993 the Supreme Court of Canada had ruled 5-4 to uphold s. 241(b) in R.v.Rodriguez. The trial judge in the Taylor case was of the view that a change in the applicable legal principles had occurred since 1993, and therefore she was no longer bound by the Rodriguez decision. In addition, much of the Plaintiff's case was based on arguments surrounding the s. 15 equality rights provisions of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which were not canvassed to any extent in the Rodriguez decision1 Finally, she was also prepared to find that the s. 7 right to life was engaged, because the prohibition had the effect of causing some people to end their lives sooner than they otherwise would if physician-assisted dying were available.

The Trial Judge ultimately granted two declaratory orders (one pursuant so s. 15, and one pursuant to s. 7) declaring that the impugned provisions of the Criminal Code infringed on the Charter and were of no force and effect to the extent that they prohibited physician-assisted suicide

" a medical practitioner in the context of a physician-patient relationship, where the assistance is provided to a fully informed, non-ambivalent competent adult patient" who has otherwise free from coercion or undue influence, was not depressed, and suffered from "...a serious illness, disease or in a state of advanced weakening capacities with no chance of improvement, has an illness that is without remedy...and has an illness causing enduring physical or psychological suffering that is intolerable to that person and cannot be alleviated by any medical treatment acceptable to that person."

The declarations were then suspended for one year (to allow for legislative change) but an exemption from the suspension was granted to Ms. Taylor2.

Prior to the release of the B.C. Court of Appeal's decision, the debate regarding physician-assisted suicide was further sparked by a video featuring Dr. Donald Low, a well-known Ontario physician, containing an impassioned plea to allow physician-assisted suicide for people who were in severe pain and terminally ill. In addition, the Province of Quebec has joined the debate by threatening to pass legislation specifically allowing physicians to provide assistance as part of the medical treatment provided in accordance with the provincial medical plan.

So, what did the B.C. Court of Appeal have to add to the debate? Well, two members of the Court of Appeal's 3 judge panel based their decision to overrule the Trial Judge's ruling on the fact that, while the law had seen some evolution since the 1993 decision in Rodriguez, it had not changed sufficiently to justify diverting from the precedent set in that case, and that " change sufficient to undermine Rodriguez as a binding authority has occurred." This represents an acknowledgment by the court of the principle of stare decisis (or "binding precedent") which guides common law jurisdictions in Canada such as British Columbia.

The majority did say, however, that in the event that the Supreme Court ultimately chose to review Rodriguez and provide a fresh analysis, it would favour the remedy of "constitutional exemption" rather than a declaratory order. This exemption is essentially a "special dispensation" given in favor of persons on whom an otherwise sound law has an extraordinary or extreme effect.

The dissenting judge would have dismissed the appeal relating to the s. 7 (right to life) challenge. Reviewing the principles of fundamental justice, as they apply to a s. 7 analysis, the Chief Justice of the Court wrote that the Supreme Court, in Rodriguez, did not give full weight to the two principles of overbreadth and gross disproportionality, and therefore it was open to the Trial Judge to consider these in her decision. (These principles essentially say that a law which is on its face contrary to the right to life might be acceptable if it is a proportional, and reasonable response to a perceived social issue).

There was a glimmer of hope, however, in the Chief Justice's dissenting opinion. He commented on how, in Rodriguez, the Supreme Court focused more on the s. 7 rights to liberty and security of the person, rather than on the right to life3. He wrote,

"The value a person ascribes to his or her life may include physical, intellectual, emotional, cultural and spiritual experiences, the engagement of one's senses, intellect and feelings, meeting challenges, enjoying successes, and accepting or overcoming defeats, forming friendships and other relationships, cooperating, helping others, being part of a team, enjoying a moment, and anticipating the future and remembering the past. Life's meaning, and by extension the life interest in s. 7, is intimately connected to the way a person values his or her lived. Experience. The point at which the meaning of life is lost, when life's positive attributes are so diminished as to render life valueless, when suffering overwhelms all else, is an intensely personal decision which "everyone" has the right to make for himself or herself."

All of this is intriguing for legal scholars, but for the person on the street, what does this mean? Unfortunately, it does not bode well for those interested in the passionate and human side of the right to physician-assisted suicide debate. Where the Trial Justice based her decision on facts, and evidence given by two individuals intensely and directly impacted by the restrictions imposed by s. 241(b) of the Criminal Code, the B.C. Court of Appeal chose to retreat behind the rubric of precedent and binding higher court decisions and not enter the arena.

The next step in the process will be (and likely already is) an application by the Plaintiffs for leave to appeal this newest decision of the B.C. Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. It will be fascinating to see if the Supreme Court accepts the challenge.. It does have the ability to review its own decisions and current thought is there is a distinct possibility that the Court will, indeed, agree to revisit Rodriguez. In passing, it is worthy of note that the current Chief Justice of our Supreme Court was one of 4 judges who dissented in 1993 when the issue was last decided and is the only member of the current court who heard argument and participated in that decision. While any decision ultimately made will be too late for either Gloria Taylor or Lee Carter, there are many, many similarly affected Canadians who will be anxiously hoping for, and awaiting the re-visitation.


1 The argument was essentially that the ban on assisted suicide discriminated against individuals with severe medical conditions that prevented them from taking their own lives.

2 Gloria Taylor subsequently passed away from an unrelated medical problem before the case was argued in the Court of Appeal. Lee Carter subsequently travelled to Switzerland and took her own life with the assistance of a physician, as sanctioned under Swiss law. However, given the importance of the issues, the Courts have allowed the matter to proceed on behalf of the estates or personal representatives of the two former Plaintiffs as well as other named Plaintiffs, including the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.

3 S. 7 of the Charter guarantees "...the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the provisions of fundamental justice."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
19 Dec 2017, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

McLennan Ross previously conducted a webinar on June 6, 2017 about the passage of Bill 17, during which we reviewed the changes to the Employment Standards Code and the Labour Relations Code. During that webinar, we identified a number of issues which would depend upon the language of the Regulations, which had not yet been developed.

24 Oct 2018, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

A written employment agreement is an often ignored best practice for non-union employers. A written agreement can be a critical risk management tool if it properly sets out duties, rights and expectations both during the employment relationship and after it ends.

5 Nov 2018, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

Who Should Attend: This webinar is intended for superintendents of schools, central office personnel, HR personnel, in house counsel and school board trustees.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions