Canada: The Supreme Court Of Canada Opens The Door To Indirect Purchasers In Price-Fixing Class Actions

Last Updated: December 9 2013
Article by Kate Southwell

The Supreme Court of Canada has recently released three related and highly anticipated decisions clarifying whether indirect purchasers have the right to bring an action to recover losses that were passed on to them by anti-competitive behaviour.

These decisions: Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd v Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57,  Sun-Rype Products Ltd v Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2013 SCC 58, and Infineon Technologies AG v Option consommateurs, 2013 SCC 59,  will almost certainly open the floodgates to a wave of class actions relating to alleged anti-competitive behaviour.

Who Are Indirect Purchasers?

For the purposes of this publication, the term 'overchargers' will be used to refer to parties at the top of the distribution chain that are alleged to have engaged in anti-competitive behavior.

In price-fixing cases, direct purchasers are those customers who have bought the product directly from the overchargers. Indirect purchasers are those customers who did not buy the product directly from the overchargers but instead bought the product from another party further down the chain of distribution.

The key issue before the Supreme Court was whether indirect purchasers have a cause of action against parties at the top of the distribution chain who are alleged to have engaged in anti-competitive behaviour, on the basis that the indirect purchasers were injured as a result of an overcharge being passed down to them.

The State Of The Law Before The Recent Supreme Court Of Canada Decisions

Previously, case law was mixed with respect to whether indirect purchasers had a cause of action against overchargers, particularly in the context of price-fixing class actions.

When Courts have rejected claims by indirect purchasers, they have usually done so for one or more of three reasons: (1) The rejection of "passing on" as a defence, (2) American jurisprudence holding that indirect purchasers do not have a cause of action, and (3) concerns about double recovery.

In the past, overchargers have invoked a defence of "passing on" against direct purchasers in price-fixing actions. This defence allowed overchargers to assert that the direct purchaser had passed on any overcharge to indirect purchasers, and thus the direct purchaser had suffered no loss. 

The passing on defence has since been rejected, both in Canada and the United States.

Some courts have held that, since the defence of passing on has been rejected, a necessary corollary is the rejection of the offensive use of passing on. They held that if overchargers are not permitted to rely on a defence of passing on, then indirect purchasers should not be able to rely on passed on overcharges as the basis of a claim. This was the position taken by the US Supreme Court in Illinois Brick Co v Illinois, 431 US 720 (1977) ("Illinois"), a seminal US case, which some Canadian courts have found persuasive.

Finally, some courts have held that if passing on may be used offensively but not as a defence, then overchargers could be liable to all purchasers in the chain of distribution. Direct purchasers and indirect purchasers could both independently seek recovery of the entire amount of the overcharge. This raises the risk than an overcharger could be subject to double or even multiple recoveries.

The Supreme Court of Canada Clarifies - Indirect Purchasers Can Have a Cause of Action

The recent trilogy of Supreme Court of Canada decisions have made it clear that indirect purchasers can have a cause of action against overchargers.

The Supreme Court held that the rejection of passing on as a defence did not necessitate its rejection as an offensive tool for indirect purchasers. It held that US jurisprudence was not persuasive and noted that the leading case of Illinois had been overturned by legislation in many US states.

Finally, the Supreme Court held that the risk of double or multiple recoveries could be managed by the courts. Where actions by direct and indirect purchasers are pending at the same time, the defendant can bring evidence of the risk of multiple recovery and ask the court to modify any damages award accordingly. Similarly, if the defendant raises evidence of parallel suits pending in multiple jurisdictions, it can ask the court to modify the damage award accordingly to prevent multiple recovery.

In finding that indirect purchasers can have a cause of action against overchargers, the Supreme Court was influenced by the idea that the rejection of indirect purchaser actions "would increase the possibility that the overcharge would remain in the hands of the wrongdoer."

As a result, the Supreme Court certified a class of indirect purchasers in one action and a class of both direct and indirect purchasers in another action. The Supreme Court refused to certify the third action on grounds unrelated to the ability, generally, of indirect purchasers to bring a claim against overchargers.

What Will Be the Impact of These Decisions on Price-Fixing Class Actions?

The ability of indirect purchasers to bring claims against overchargers can be expected to significantly expand the number of class actions alleging anti-competitive behavior.

Generally, a product will have more indirect purchasers than direct purchasers. Allowing indirect purchasers to form a class, with or without direct purchasers, will increase the number of potential class members and thus the likelihood of a class action.

Additionally, direct purchasers often have close business relationships with overchargers. This can make direct purchasers reluctant to bring an action against overchargers, or it can lead to settlement outside of formal court proceedings. Indirect purchasers may be more willing to bring class actions against overchargers, as they don't typically have the same close business relationship.

Many potential class actions were held in abeyance while potential class members waited for confirmation from the courts about whether indirect purchasers may be part of a class against overchargers. With the Supreme Court's recent ruling paving the way for indirect purchasers, we can expect to see a marked increase in the number of price-fixing class actions in the coming years.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Gowling WLG
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Gowling WLG
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions