The US Federal Trade Commission is taking aim at native
advertising and sponsored content. On December 4th, the FTC will be
hosting a workshop to examine the blurring of digital ads with
digital content. In advance of the workshop, the American Society
of Magazine Editors (ASME) updated its Guidelines for Editors and
Publishers by adding a new section to address native advertising.
The new section states that native advertising should be
prominently labeled as advertising, and the source of the sponsor
and affiliation of the author should be clearly acknowledged. The
term "Sponsor Content" can be used to label native
advertising. There should be a prominent statement or scroll over
notice explaining that the sponsor paid for publication of the
content. The content should be distinguishable from editorial
content, and for example, not use similar fonts and graphics, and
be visually separated from editorial content. Certain types of
native advertising used to be referred to as an
"advertorial". However, ASME's Guidelines, and the
industry, generally discourage use of that term.
It remains to be seen how native advertising will be addressed
in Canada. The issue has been on Magazines Canada's radar for
about a year, and is being considered by a committee. With all the
stakeholders in the magazine industry and divergent views on the
issue, building consensus can be a challenge. However, if the past
is an indicator, new guidelines can be expected, which may or may
not take cues from ASME. Magazines Canada's Code of Reader
& Advertiser Engagement (Code) currently addresses sponsorship,
and provides some guidance. The Code prohibits use of an
advertiser's name and logo to suggest advertising of any
regularly appearing editorial, and terms such as
"sponsored" or "brought to you by" are
prohibited. One-off editorial extras may be sponsored, for example,
special features, sections, inserts and onserts, provided the
editorial does not mention or endorse the advertiser, and the
advertiser does not have input in the creation of the
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Join Bereskin & Parr partners Susan Keri and Terry Edwards on Wednesday, May 3rd, 2017 for an in-depth discussion with prominent lawyers from the EU and UK about trademark issues for Canadian businesses doing or planning to do business in Europe.
This paper summarizes selected developments in Canadian Internet law during 2016. Internet law is a vast area that continues to develop rapidly. Reference to current legislation, regulatory policies...
Social media platforms, like Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Facebook and GooglePlus, arguably have more followers and are more closely monitored by market participants than conventional news...
On March 6, 2017, CAVCO issued three public notices regarding eligibility for the Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit , one of which is of particular interest to non-Canadian OTT service providers.
The B.C. Supreme Court's recent decision in Pritchard v. Van Nes (2016 BCSC 686) serves not only as a reminder that a poster of defamatory comments on social media can be held liable for the damage caused...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).