Canada: Resource Revenue Transparency: New Disclosure Rules Forthcoming For Canadian Mining And Oil & Gas Companies

Last Updated: November 21 2013
Article by Laura Easton and John Munnis

In June, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced that Canada will join other G8 countries and adopt mandatory reporting rules for mining and oil gas companies (“extractive companies”) to disclose all payments they make to host governments for resource extraction projects (“mandatory reporting”). This is one of the biggest changes to public reporting and disclosure the extractive sector has seen in years and important steps need to be taken to be ready.

The Prime Minister’s announcement followed the passage of mandatory reporting in the United States under Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010 (“Section 1504”). Last August, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Rule 13q-1 to implement Section 1504. However, in July a District Court in the District of Columbia vacated the rule after a successful challenge by the American Petroleum Institute, which has put the timing of implementation of mandatory reporting in the United States in serious question. However, the European Union has remained active in this area and formally adopted the European Union’s Transparency Directive (“EU Directive”) on October 17th that contains similar rules to Section 1504.

Canada’s entry into mandatory reporting has been strongly influenced by the work of a Resource Revenue Transparency Working Group (the “Working Group”) that was convened last September by key mining industry groups and civil society organizations to support adopting a reporting framework in Canada similar to Section 1504. The Working Group published its draft report just two days after the Prime Minister’s announcement in June and is expected to issue its final report at the end of the month. Natural Resources Canada (“NRCan”) has picked up on many of the Working Group’s recommendations during NRCan’s own consultation process over the summer, and is expected to provide detailed recommendations for mandatory reporting after the final Working Group report is released. Once the federal government has both reports in hand it is expected to introduce legislation for mandatory reporting in early 2014.

This bulletin highlights some of the key issues for mandatory reporting that will define how this framework will be implemented and what companies should be doing now to get prepared. This includes understanding the breadth of payment types that will be covered; how ‘project-level’ reporting will work; the threshold amount requiring disclosure; how payments to aboriginal groups will be treated; and whether any exemptions will be permitted. All of these issues will be influenced by the existing frameworks in Section 1504 and the EU Directive, as well as the recommendations of the Working Group and NRCan.

Key Issues for Mandatory Reporting for Extractive Companies in Canada

1. Types of Payments

The SEC’s Rule 13q-1 provides a non-exhaustive list of payments they determined to be part of the commonly recognized revenue stream for the development of an extractive project. These include taxes, royalties, fees, production entitlements, bonuses and infrastructure payments (required by law or contract). This same list was referenced in the NRCan consultations and the Working Group’s draft report (though transportation fees and fines/penalties were also added to the latter.) It is unlikely the federal government will stray far from this list, although there is some support among extractive companies to allow for voluntary “social payments”, such as contributions to local hospitals or schools, to be included. This will likely be permitted as a voluntary category, as is the case under Rule 13q-1.

2. "Project" Definition

The payments listed above are intended to be disclosed on a project-by-project basis, but there is still an issue as to what constitutes a “project” and a preference of some companies for disclosure on a country-wide basis. This was a key debate under Section 1504 but ultimately the SEC chose to use a flexible definition of “project” based on the legal agreements that give rise to payment liabilities such as contracts, licenses, leases or concessions. The Working Group recommended adopting this approach, which seemed largely uncontroversial during the NRCan consultations. As such, expect the Canadian legislation to adopt project-level reporting, even if it means companies will have to disaggregate payments such as corporate income tax in countries where they have multiple projects.

3. Reporting Threshold

A more contentious issue concerns the reporting threshold for payments, which Section 1504 sets at a ‘non de minimus’ level, later determined by the SEC in Rule 13q-1 to be $100,000. The EU Directive set a similar threshold at €100,000, even though regulators in both jurisdictions were pressured to set the threshold at the “materiality” level that public issuers are more accustomed to. This approach was rejected given the secondary purpose of mandatory reporting to benefit local communities in creating greater accountability for resource revenue and not just investors making informed investment decisions. In Canada, the Working Group went a step further and proposed a dual reporting threshold of $100,000 for companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and a lower $10,000 threshold for smaller companies listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. The purpose behind the lower threshold was to allow smaller issuers to better show the payments they are making to local governments since at a $100,000 threshold “a large part of the Canadian mining sector would effectively report no revenue paid.” Both of these thresholds proved contentious at the NRCan consultations with larger issuers seeking the materiality threshold and smaller issuers concerned that $10,000 would result in difficult and expensive compliance. While it is unlikely that Canada will adopt a materiality standard for mandatory reporting, the concerns of junior issuers did seem to resonate and so a $100,000 threshold for all issuers appears the most likely outcome.

4. Aboriginal Payments

While much of the mandatory reporting framework in Canada tracks the precedents of Section 1504 and the EU Directive, the one unique aspect in Canada’s approach is the intention to require mandatory reporting for payments to First Nations and aboriginal groups. Extractive companies often enter into joint ventures and/or impact benefit agreements with aboriginal groups in Canada or elsewhere that give rise to payment obligations not unlike payments to local host governments. During the NRCan consultations there was a lot of concern about this proposal from Canadian aboriginal groups who indicated a strong preference to keep such payments confidential. Industry representatives seemed more receptive so long as their aboriginal counterparties were on board. This resistance could pose a challenge for the mandatory reporting regime and potentially delay implementation. One solution might be a phased-in approach where disclosure to aboriginal groups is not mandated initially or even dealt with separately altogether under a purely federal framework.

5. Forum for Disclosure

One of the areas with the strongest consensus for developing a mandatory reporting framework in Canada is the choice of provincial securities regulators as the preferred forum for this disclosure to be made and enforced. During the NRCan consultations, companies expressed familiarity with provincial securities filings under SEDAR and indicated that they don’t wish to have to deal with a new federal bureaucracy for what they see as relatively minor financial reporting. This consensus raises interesting constitutional questions for the federal government, given the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Reference re: Securities Act that found that much of the day-to-day regulation of securities falls under the property and civil rights concerns of the provinces. This may explain why the federal government has been quietly consulting with provincial mining ministries and may seek to support provincial legislation in this area rather than just a stand-alone federal statute. Should the federal government proceed on its own it may be better suited to survive a constitutional challenge given the international development objectives of the legislation that are a national concern and not one the provinces are actively seeking to address. Should the provinces effectively administer this framework, there could still be a role for the federal government in covering private companies not covered under securities regulation, which NRCan has indicated it is interested in addressing in any framework going forward.

Exemptions and Public Disclosure

As previously mentioned, the D.C. District Court’s ruling in July to vacate Rule 13q-1 has thrown off the timing of implementation of Section 1504 but has also raised substantive issues for Canada’s own framework. The Court vacated Rule 13q-1 by finding that the SEC’s refusal to permit exemptions for countries that prohibit such disclosure (Angola, Cameroon, China, and Qatar were cited) was “arbitrary and capricious” and, further, that the SEC had no basis to require that mandatory reporting be publicly available. The Working Group, whose draft report came out before the District Court’s ruling, firmly endorsed public disclosure and rejected any exemptions on the basis that they would “run counter to the spirit of improving transparency.” Industry views during the NRCan consultation process were more nuanced on this point with some companies fearing a loss of business or good relations if they disclosed payments against the wishes of host countries. That said, industry representatives acknowledged that confidentiality clauses in their contracts almost always permit disclosure where required by law and mining companies in particular appear prepared to reject a ‘tyrant’s veto’ approach that would carve out disclosure for certain regimes that reject mandatory reporting.

The exemption issue may be the most difficult to predict given the strong support for equivalency with Section 1504 among all stakeholders in Canada. On September 3, 2013 the SEC announced that it would not appeal the District Court’s ruling and so the agency will now have to propose a new draft rule that seeks to address the deficiencies identified by the District Court. Given the two years it took the SEC to release the final version of Rule 13q-1 there is little likelihood that a draft rule will be proposed before the Canadian legislation is introduced. Therefore, it is possible that Canada may hedge its bets and require full public disclosure of the reports with no exemptions but leave itself some flexibility to pass regulations that would permit exemptions in the future.

What Canadian Resource Companies Should Be Doing Now

Even though it is likely to be at least a year or more before mandatory reporting becomes a reality in Canada there are still a number of steps extractive companies should take now to be prepared:

1. Stay informed: There are a lot of important details for the Canadian regime to be still worked out, including the ones identified above, but also issues such as reporting payments on a cash or accrued basis; who will certify or provide assurances for the disclosure; what role auditors will play, if any; and the remedies or consequences for omissions or non-compliance. While industry has expressed its views during the NRCan consultations there will likely be further opportunities to influence this framework once the legislation is introduced. It will also be important to follow the SEC’s release of the revised Rule 13q-1, which will be made available for public comment and potentially influence Canadian regulations or equivalency provisions.

2. Watch your confidentiality clauses: Extractive projects have long timelines and so payments required under contracts being entered into now will likely have to be disclosed in the future. Therefore, companies are well advised to ensure that confidentiality clauses in any licences, agreements, concession leases or other contracts they enter into with host governments permit disclosure of what might otherwise be confidential information when required by law. This may be of particular relevance in impact benefit agreements and other contracts with aboriginal groups given some of the resistance to this disclosure seen to date.

3. Start keeping track of payments internally: Companies would be well-served to assess their own record-keeping and accounting systems to see how capable they track resource project payments. Over 100 Canadian companies are already listed on US stock exchanges and may well have started to implement compliance programs. For everyone else, Rule 13-q gave US issuers a little over a year to start tracking and reporting such payments and it is unlikely the Canadian legislation will provide much more lead time. Companies should therefore assess their capabilities sooner rather than later to ensure sufficient time to implement proper monitoring and reporting systems. Industry associations may also play a useful role in gathering best practices and coordinating the development of accounting systems that could reduce costs of compliance.

The international focus on transparency, as most recently manifest in mandatory reporting, presents one of the biggest changes to the extractive sector in some time. Legal counsel can greatly assist in ensuring companies are appropriately managing and complying with these changes. Keep watching this space for updates on mandatory reporting and how best to prepare for this new framework for project development and the resource revenues associated therewith.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions