Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Trilogy Holds That Indirect Purchasers May Advance Class Action For Recovery Of Unlawful Price-Fixing

The Supreme Court of Canada rulings in three consumer class actions have been long anticipated by competition and class action lawyers on several key questions, including the extent to which indirect purchasers may claim private law remedies for anti-competitive conduct. In the past two years, appellate decisions in British Columbia and Quebec diverged on the ability of indirect purchasers to advance class action claims. The new rulings have changed the legal landscape by confirming the ability of consumers to bring indirect purchaser claims (i.e. their purchase was made through an intermediary) and outlining the low threshold for doing so as a class proceeding.

The BC Court of Appeal majority decisions in Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v Microsoft Corporation1 and Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v Archer Daniels Midland Company2 had diverged from prior decisions in Canadian competition class actions in holding that indirect purchasers had no claim recognized in Canadian law. Meanwhile, the Quebec Court of Appeal decision in Infineon Technologies AG et al. v Option Consommateurs, et al.3 tipped the scales in favour of claimants, allowing indirect purchasers to advance a claim.

These decisions will impact potential defendants significantly, by making it easier to bring claims for antitrust damages.

Five key points of interest in the Supreme Court trilogy include:

  • Indirect purchasers do have the ability to maintain Competition Act claims for damages against price fixers;
  • Foreign defendants whose price fixing conduct was outside of Canada are nonetheless subject to Canadian laws where there is evidence of economic harm within the jurisdiction;
  • The plaintiffs must show "some basis in fact" for each of the certification requirements, but are not required to establish the merits of the action at the certification stage;
  • The court allowed certain claims in restitution to proceed to certification, including waiver of tort; and
  • The damages for price fixing must be limited to the aggregate of the overcharge to avoid double recovery.

The background

In contrast to the United States, Canadian courts had not previously foreclosed the possibility of indirect purchaser competition class actions. Plaintiffs have had, though, evidentiary difficulty establishing on a class-wide basis that all or any part of an alleged overcharge was passed on through various steps in a supply or distribution chain, or a clear methodology to calculate pass-through damages. However, as these decisions indicate, courts may proceed to certify competition class actions which include both direct and indirect purchasers combined into "universal" classes. They have done so on the basis of novel applications of statutory aggregate damages and by permitting plaintiffs to advance disgorgement claims instead of, or in addition to, damage claims and pursuant to proposals by plaintiffs' counsel to subdivide any overall award of damages between various levels of claimants.

The British Columbia cases

In Microsoft, the plaintiffs also advanced claims under the Competition Act, in economic tort, in unjust enrichment and constructive trust. They alleged a "vertical" cartel comprising Microsoft and computer manufacturers, acting illegally to inflate its revenues by deliberately inflating prices for the end consumers. The plaintiffs purchased computers with Microsoft operating systems and applications software from the direct purchasers; they claimed the overcharge was passed on to them as indirect purchasers. The motions judge certified the class of indirect purchasers.

In Sun-Rype, the plaintiffs alleged North America's major high fructose corn syrup manufacturers conspired to illegally fix the prices of the popular sweetener used in food and beverage products. The direct purchasers claimed in constructive trust. As in Microsoft, the indirect purchasers advanced claims under the Competition Act, in economic tort, and in unjust enrichment. They alleged that an overcharge was imposed on direct purchasers (the juice manufacturer Sun-Rype), which overcharge was passed through to indirect purchasers who purchased, sold or consumed the end products. The motions judge certified a class that included both direct and indirect purchasers.

The Quebec case

Manufacturers of dynamic random access memory (DRAM), found in many common electronic devices, pleaded guilty to allegations of a price fixing conspiracy in the US in 2004. Option Consommateurs brought a motion in Quebec soon after, seeking to certify as a class anyone who had bought a product equipped with a DRAM chip in Quebec. The claim relied on breach of the Competition Act and conduct amounting to a fault giving rise to civil liability under the Civil Code of Quebec. The putative class included both direct and indirect purchasers. The pleadings did not distinguish between types of products or even types of end consumers, such as purchasers who bought DRAM equipped products second-hand. The certification judge found he lacked territorial jurisdiction but in any event would have denied certification for the indirect purchasers, finding the pleadings failed to argue why indirect purchasers would have suffered harm.

On appeal, the indirect purchasers were successful. The Quebec Court of Appeal held the class claimants were not required to demonstrate a "clear methodology" to show pass-through damages; the subsequent trial on the merits will show who among all the class claimants grouped together actually had valid claims for damages.

SCC decisions

Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57

The SCC unanimously allowed the appeal and restored the certification judge's decision,

The key holding of this case is that indirect purchasers "have a cause of action against the party who has effectuated the overcharge at the top of the distribution chain that has allegedly injured the indirect purchasers as a result of the overcharge being 'passed on' to them through the chain of distribution."

The Court rejected the lower court's view, finding that while passing-on as a defence was rejected in the whole of restitutionary law in Kingstreet, the offensive use of passing on is still very much alive. The risks of double or multiple recovery can be managed by the courts and the plaintiffs willingly assume the daunting evidentiary burdens associated with proof of damages. In some cases, suits initiated by indirect purchasers at the end of the chain may be the only means of promoting the deterrence aims of competition law.

It was not plain and obvious that the tort and unjust enrichment pleadings struck in this case were bound to fail. Issues of whether the claimants can recover in unjust enrichment in the absence of a direct relationship should be left to the trial judge and certain elements of the tort claims are subject to a pending SCC decision.

Finally, the Court said the requirement of plaintiffs to show "some basis in fact" for each of the certification requirements is not an investigation of the merits of the action. The certification judge's decision that the claims raised common issues, that damages can be determined on an aggregate basis and that a class proceeding is the preferable proceeding should not be disturbed.

Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v Archer Danials Midland Company, 2013 SCC 58

The SCC dismissed the appeal, having decided that indirect purchasers do have a right to bring an action, and that combining direct and indirect purchasers into one class does not raise the spectre of double or multiple recovery because the evidence at trial will determine the aggregate amount of the overcharge. Courts can modify awards in accordance with awards already received in other jurisdictions to prevent double recovery.

However, unlike in Microsoft, the indirect purchasers here were unsuccessful due to lack of sufficient evidence of the putative class. The majority held that the appellants did not produce evidence to establish some "basis in fact" that there were class members who could prove they actually purchased products containing high fructose corn syrup. Even though indirect purchasers may have suffered harm from the alleged price-fixing scheme, they cannot self-identify based on the proposed definition. Two judges disagreed taking the view that the majority was imposing a merit test on the appellants.

All nine judges agreed the direct purchaser claim in constructive trust had no chance of succeeding.

Infineon Technologies AG v Option consommateurs, 2013 SCC 59

The SCC unanimously dismissed the appeal and upheld the Court of Appeal's authorization of the action, finding the respondents (Option Consommateurs) had met the relatively low threshold under the Code of Civil Procedure for authorization of class actions. At the authorization stage, the case is not to be decided on its merit and essentially class claimants are simply required to establish that they have an arguable case. The evidence surrounding the alleged fault was premised on a conspiracy in the United Stated with no explicit connection to Quebec. This nonetheless gave rise to an inference of an impact on the Canadian market and therefore supported an inference of fault giving rise to an actionable claim. Pursuant to the Quebec rules of extra-contractual liability, damages have to be a direct consequence of an injurious act (fault), but indirect purchasers further down the chain are not barred from recovery. Direct and indirect purchasers may form the class where the allegation is of passing on of price increases. Unlike in common law provinces, claimants in Quebec do not need to advance a methodology capable of demonstrating aggregate loss that would apply to both direct and indirect purchasers; rather they need to demonstrate an arguable case that injury was suffered. Moreover, class claimants are not required to demonstrate that each class member suffered a loss nor to quantify the loss at the authorization stage. A more detailed analysis is contained in a recent McMillan bulletin by Sidney Elbaz and Eric Vallieres.


The implications of this trilogy will be litigated in the years to come as plaintiffs cite the low threshold for certification seemingly endorsed by the court. One can easily envision that more class actions will be filed and certified regardless of the merits of the claim. Canada's highest court has made it clear that the more stringent evidentiary approach as endorsed in the US Supreme Court in Wal-Mart v Dukes has little application to Canadian class actions.

1 2011 BCCA 186
2 2011 BCCA 187
3 2011 QCCA 2116

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2013 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Joan M. Young
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.