Canada: Alberta’s Health Services Preferential Access Inquiry Concludes "Improper Preferential Access As A Minor Component Of The Public Health Care System"

Last Updated: September 23 2013
Article by Nadia Jandali Chao

The final report on the public inquiry into preferential access to health services in Alberta was released on August 21, 2013.1 As described in the report, the inquiry, which began in December of 2012 and heard from 68 witnesses prior to its completion in the spring of 2013, uncovered some isolated incidents of improper preferential access to Alberta's publicly-funded health care system.  There was no evidence that any individual had been medically harmed2 as a result of these incidents or that improper preferential access is a widespread phenomenon in Alberta.  In fact, the Commissioner of the inquiry, the Honourable Justice John Vertes, ultimately concluded that "[i]mproper preferential access is a minor component of the public health care system."3 However, the inquiry demonstrated that "myriad" opportunities exist within the health care system for queue-jumping and preferential treatment.  In light of these findings, Justice Vertes made 12 recommendations for preventing future incidents of improper access.


The multi-million dollar public inquiry was established by the Alberta Government pursuant to the Health Quality Council of Alberta Act4in February 2012 in order to investigate allegations that some individuals were receiving faster access to public health care services for reasons other than medical need.  At the centre of the inquiry were media reports that Dr. Stephen Duckett, the former CEO of Alberta Health Services, had claimed some of his predecessor CEOs had designated "go to guys" who would manipulate wait lists in response to requests from prominent Albertans for expedited care.  Further, as described in the report, Dr. Raj Sherman, an emergency room physician and current Liberal MP, reportedly claimed that it was common for prominent Albertans to jump the queue for medical care and that he had personally received requests from hospital executives for certain patients to get preferential treatment.5

The inquiry investigated other controversial allegations, such as the "Calgary Flames" incident, where during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic the Calgary Flames hockey players, staff and their families had allegedly by-passed five-hour line-ups and received vaccinations at a private clinic; and the "Helios" incident, where patients from the private Helios Wellness Centre were allegedly being bumped to the front of the line for colonoscopies at the public Colon Cancer Screening Centre in Calgary–sometimes receiving screenings within weeks or even days, while other patients often had to wait years.

In the early stages of the inquiry, the government faced criticism that the scope was too narrow.6  Similar criticism remains in the wake of the final report.  After its release, Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith praised the report's recommendations, but was quoted as stating "[o]f course, this isn't the inquiry most people were asking for.  We were asking for an inquiry that also looked into bullying and intimidation of health care professionals."7  Dr. Sherman also weighed in with reproach, stating that the Alberta government "has wasted precious time and millions of taxpayers' money to investigate a symptom of a disease instead of formulating a plan to cure it."8

Important Factual Findings

Justice Vertes concluded that the allegations of preferential treatment made by Dr. Duckett and Dr. Sherman, which had initially prompted the inquiry, were in fact unfounded.  As he stated in the report, "[t]here was no evidence proving that any MLA had used influence or other means to enhance his or her own care or that of family or friends."9

But Justice Vertes did find evidence that isolated incidents of queue-jumping had occurred.  Among these incidents were the Calgary Flames and Helios allegations.  According to Justice Vertes, the Calgary Flames episode was a "clear-cut" case of improper preferential access.10  Evidence presented at the inquiry by 15 witnesses over several days also satisfied Justice Vertes that Helios patients had received improper preferential access to screening colonoscopies.11  Despite these findings, Justice Vertes emphasized that such incidents were rare and were not representative of the Alberta health care system as a whole.

Defining "Improper Preferential Access"

Critical to the inquiry was an understanding of the concept of improper preferential access.  Whether a particular form of preferential access will be regarded as improper is contextual, and depends on how it is accepted by the public and within the general medical community.  For example, Justice Vertes noted that some people may consider it appropriate for front-line health care workers and their families to be given priority vaccinations during a pandemic, or for preferential access to be given to patients enrolled in research studies.12  Accordingly, developing a widely accepted definition of "improper preferential access" is no simple task.  Justice Vertes ultimately defined the term broadly as "any policy, decision or action that cannot be medically or ethically justified, resulting in someone obtaining priority access over others similarly situated."13


Given the various factors that can impact whether something constitutes "improper" preferential access, Justice Vertes recommended that Alberta Health Services' future policy on preferential access explicitly state which forms of preferential access are considered improper and will not be permitted. 

One form of preferential access the inquiry heard evidence about was professional courtesy, where physicians give priority to requests for care by other physicians, health care workers and their families.  As there is a lack of consensus within the medical community about what kinds of professional courtesy amount to improper preferential access, Justice Vertes recommended that entities representing the relevant health care workers, including the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, collaborate to define the appropriate scope and application of this practice.

Justice Vertes identified "systemic issues that could foster an environment conducive to improper preferential access."14 He noted a number of entry points (e.g. workers' compensation, private diagnostic imaging) into Alberta's health care system, "each with its own opportunities for preferential access".15  Wait lists also received considerable attention on the basis that they can serve to motivate individuals to access treatment through improper means.  In addition to recommending that the province continue its ongoing efforts to reduce wait times and improve access to health care services, Justice Vertes proposed that Alberta Health Services develop wait list management strategies, standardized referral procedures, and centralized triage and booking systems.

Justice Vertes made a number of additional recommendations including that the province: strengthen the queue-jumping provisions of Alberta's Health Care Protection Act;16 expand the whistleblower protection under the Public Interest Disclosure (Whistleblower Protection) Act;17 consider creating an independent office of Health Advocate to provide advocacy assistance to patients and to help resolve complaints; develop a policy on courtesy calls, where health care professionals are alerted to the presence of high-profile patients; strengthen access, triage and booking procedures; develop a policy on the so-called private patient path, where physicians direct their patients to the emergency department for the purpose of being treated by them or another specific physician; and develop rules on how to address requests for special accommodation during a pandemic.

Government Response

The provincial government appears to support the recommendations.  In response to the final report, Alberta's Health Minister, the Honourable Fred Horne, announced in a public statement that the government had accepted "in principle" Justice Vertes' recommendations that required legislative action, and accepted all other recommendations "in full".18  With respect to government action, he reported that "[w]e have already made progress on recommendations to reduce wait times, implement wait list management strategies, standardize referral procedures and booking systems, and to create a Health Advocate."19  He also noted in the statement that "[p]ublic confidence in Alberta's health system is critical. The checks and balances Justice Vertes has recommended in his report will reassure Albertans that preferential access is not occurring so they can have the utmost confidence in their health system."20

Administrative Challenges

Justice Vertes identified certain challenges faced by the inquiry which flowed from the manner in which it was established and organized by the government.21  For example, he implied that the inquiry was called too hastily given that the allegations which prompted it had not been subject to any meaningful prior investigation.  He was critical of the fact that, contrary to accepted practice, he was not given an opportunity to comment on the terms of reference before they were finalized, noting that such consultation is "important primarily because the commissioner's principal task is to ensure that it is possible to carry out the work described in the terms of reference."22  He also concluded that the "tripartite arrangement" through which the Health Quality Council of Alberta administered the funding for the inquiry on behalf of the government resulted in a duplication of effort in budget oversight without any corresponding improvement in financial accountability.

He made a variety of recommendations for future inquiries, including that the Alberta government develop policies and procedures to guide commissions of inquiry on organizational matters; that a senior official in the cabinet office be designated as a contact person for any provincial inquiry in order to make prompt decisions on administrative and financial matters; and that future inquiries called pursuant to section 17 of the Health Quality Council of Alberta Act have the option of using the "administrative apparatus" of the Council.23


In his conclusions, Justice Vertes stated that faith in the public health care system can be damaged by the public perception that some people receive faster access to treatment because of who they are or who they know, even when actual incidents of these occurrences are extremely rare.24  In a country whose health care system is premised on the principle that access to services should be based solely on medical need, as opposed to social status or personal connections, the report could be said to have significance for all provinces.  It remains to be seen, however, what kind of long-lasting impact the public inquiry and the ensuing recommendations will have on wait times and queue-jumping in Alberta's health care system.


1 Health Services Preferential Access Inquiry – Alberta: Inquiry Report, by The Honourable John Z. Vertes (August 2013).

2 Ibid at p 2 (Vol 1).  After stating that there was no specific evidence of harm to any individual, Justice Vertes noted "it would be almost impossible in any event to show that giving one person improper preferential access directly harmed another."

3 Ibid at p 253 (Vol 1).

4 SA 2011, c H-7.2.

5 Supra note 1at p 2 (Vol 1).

6 Shawn Logan, "Wildrose leader Danielle Smith calls queue-jumping inquiry a waste", Calgary Sun (11 December 2012), online: < >; "President's Letter", Alberta Medical Association (February 29, 2012), online: .

7 Emily Mertz, "Health Inquiry finds incidents of preferential access did occur", Global News (22 August 2013), online: < >.

8 CBC News, "Queue-jumping a fact, Alberta medical inquiry finds", CBC News (21 August 2013), online: < >.

9 Supra note 1 at p 159 (Vol 1).

10 Supra note 1 at p 197 (Vol 1).

11 Supra note 1 at p 219, 232 (Vol 1).

12 Supra note 1 at p 110-111 (Vol 1).

13 Supra note 1 at p 130 (Vol 1).

14 Supra note 1 at p 2 (Vol 1).

15 Supra note 1 at p 4 (Vol 1).

16 RSA 2000, c H-1, s 3.

17 SA 2012, c P-39.5.

18 Government of Alberta, News Release, "Minister releases statement on inquiry findings" (21 August 2013) online: Government of Alberta < http:/ >.

19 Ibid.

20 Ibid.

21 Supra note 1 at pp 259-265 (Vol 1).

22 Supra note 1 at pp 260-261 (Vol 1).

23 Supra note 1 at pp 260-264 (Vol 1).

24 Supra note 1 at p 253 (Vol 1).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions