An Ontario judge has imposed a $1,050,000 fine against Vale
Canada Limited, the highest fine ever imposed under the Ontario
Occupational Health and Safety Act. It appears that the
previous record fine, handed down in 2010, had been $850,000.
Vale is also required to pay a Victim Fine Surcharge of 25%,
bringing the total to $1,312,500.
The fine resulted from a double-fatality after an uncontrolled
release of broken rock and ore buried one worker and hit the other
in a Sudbury mine.
Vale pleaded guilty to three counts under the Occupational
Health and Safety Act including failing to prevent the
movement of material through an ore pass while hazardous conditions
(a hang-up of broken rock and ore).
Mr. Justice Randall Lalande of the Ontario Court of Justice
sentenced Vale to a fine of $350,000 on each count. The Ministry of
Labour, in its press release, notes that "This is the highest
ever total fine levied by a Court in Ontario for contraventions of
the Occupational Health and Safety Act."
According to the Sudbury Star, Vale and the Ministry of Labour
presented a joint-submission to the court, that the fine be
$350,000 per count. The court accepted the joint submission.
The maximum fine under the Occupational Health and Safety
Act for a corporation is $500,000 per count.
What were the factors that led the court to impose this historic
fine? It appears that Vale's size, the fact that two workers
died, and the OHSA record of Vale were signficant factors.
In particular, Inco, the operations of which Vale purchased, was
convicted in 2001 of two charges under the OHSA and fined $650,000
($325,000.00 per count) after a worker died. It was noted at the
time that Inco had 11 prior convictions.
Earlier this month, the Ontario Court of Appeal imposed a fine
of $750,000 for criminal negligence causing death, on Metron
Construction – up from the $200,000 fine imposed by the trial
judge. In that case, the Court of Appeal stated that the cases
under the OHSA "revealed a range of fines between $115,000 and
$425,000 for cases involving fatalities."
The Vale (OHSA) and Metron Construction (Criminal Code) fines
seem to suggest that fines, particularly in fatality cases, are
rising in Ontario. Employers should take note.
The Ministry of Labour's press release may be found here.
Dentons is a global firm driven to provide you with the
competitive edge in an increasingly complex and interconnected
marketplace. We were formed by the March 2013 combination of
international law firm Salans LLP, Canadian law firm Fraser Milner
Casgrain LLP (FMC) and international law firm SNR Denton.
Dentons is built on the solid foundations of three highly
regarded law firms. Each built its outstanding reputation and
valued clientele by responding to the local, regional and national
needs of a broad spectrum of clients of all sizes –
individuals; entrepreneurs; small businesses and start-ups; local,
regional and national governments and government agencies; and
mid-sized and larger private and public corporations, including
international and global entities.
Now clients benefit from more than 2,500 lawyers and
professionals in 79 locations in 52 countries across Africa, Asia
Pacific, Canada, Central Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Russia and
the CIS, the UK and the US who are committed to challenging the
status quo to offer creative, actionable business and legal
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to
this article should be addressed directly to the author.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Dentons hosted a panel discussion about the management of liabilities and risks associated with environmental crises, including potential liabilities for directors and officers and provided insight into risk and liability techniques associated with environmental crisis management.
Unfortunately, reasonable accommodation for employees in the workplace continues to be the source of significant litigation and even today we continue to see outrageous examples of employers behaving badly.
We are now beginning to see reported cases involving charges and subsequent fines laid against employers for failing to provide information, instruction and supervision to protect a worker from workplace violence.
On October 13, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal an Ontario Court of Appeal decision which ordered an employer to pay a former employee 37 months of salary and benefits following termination.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).