Canada: Head Above Water

Last Updated: April 1 2004

By David Vincent and Scott Bomhof

Published in Benefits Canada, March 2004.

During the 1990s, pension surplus was perhaps the most contentious issue facing many Canadian pension plan administrators. The issues of whether surplus could be withdrawn, used to reduce employer-required pension contributions or even whether surplus could be used to finance benefit improvements for different subsets of pension plan members (for example, to provide an early retirement window) were often so contentious that they resulted in litigation. Now, the most contentious issue is pension solvency, along with related issues such as pension accounting, investment policy, plan design and regulation requirements.

Pension surplus has been used to increase corporate earnings in financial statements. What is included as pension expense on the income statement of a pension plan sponsor is not the annual cash contribution to the pension plan but rather an amount comprised of three key components:

  1. Service cost: Corporations annually report a service cost to reflect an incremental year of service by pension plan members, which entitles the members to more future benefits payments and increases the company’s pension obligation.
  2. Interest cost: This reflects the growing time value of the future payments owed to pension plan members.
  3. Expected return on plan assets (ROA): Pension funds are invested in a combination of equities and bonds, anticipating markets will provide returns that increase the size of the asset pool enough to meet future obligations to employees; if so, it reduces or eliminates future employer contribution obligations.

The above three components are combined to arrive at a pension expense or pension income that appears on the corporation’s income statement. If the combined service cost and interest cost is larger than the expected ROA, the corporation will report a pension expense. If not, the corporation reports pension income. Pension income does not legally belong to a corporation’s

shareholders, nor does it contribute to corporate cash flow, but it will improve corporate earnings. This combination of attributes has attracted controversy, especially after Enron and other recent accounting scandals in the United States. A study of the 27 largest Canadian corporations revealed that in fiscal years ending in 2000, 11 of these companies reported pension income rather than pension expense, and for these companies, pension income represented an average of 5% of operating earnings. Examples were Maple Leaf Foods Inc., with pension income accounting for 11.8% of its operating income, Hudson’s Bay Company, with 9.4%, Dofasco Inc., with 8.6% and BCE Inc. with 6.3%.

Many Canadian defined benefit (DB) pension plans allocate 60% or more of their assets to equities. The heavy equity weighting had the effect of increasing pension fund investment returns while stock markets were buoyant during the 1980s and 1990s. However, many pension funds did not reduce their equity allocations at or before the peak of the stock market indices in 2000.

Massive Deficits

The years since 2000 have not been kind to DB pension plans. Substantial erosion of pension assets has occurred due to adverse equity returns. ROA assumptions have been reduced. Declining long-term interest rates have greatly increased pension liabilities. Malcolm Hamilton, a prominent actuary with Mercer Human Resource Consulting in Toronto, stated recently: "The last three years have provided a wake-up call. For the first time in 20 years, the cost of pension plan sponsorship is evident and painful."

Some pundits have gone so far as to challenge the accepted wisdom that investment returns from equities will beat fixed income over the long term and have suggested it is unwise for corporations to allocate pension funds to any equity investments. Pension obligations are much like longterm bond obligations. It has been suggested that investing a pension fund in stocks is like borrowing long-term corporate debt on the bond market and investing the debt proceeds in the stock market. In effect, the shareholders of the pension plan sponsor are forced to accept the risk associated with a pension fund stock portfolio, in addition to the risk of the business in which they have invested.

Instead of pension surpluses being used to rescue insolvent companies, massive pension deficits have recently become a predominant reason why some large Canadian employers like Algoma Steel Inc., Air Canada and, very recently, Stelco Inc., have been forced to seek protection from their creditors under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. According to press reports, Ontario’s Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund (PBGF)—a statutory pension insurance scheme administered by Ontario’s Superintendent of Financial Services and financed by employer assessments— could face claims in excess of $1 billion as the result of the Algoma and Stelco insolvencies. Yet, the PBGF presently has assets of only about $200 million.

While many DB single-employer pension plans face massive deficits, pension plan members are usually still protected as long as their employer is solvent. Canadian law prohibits the reduction of accrued pension benefits and the cost of funding DB pension deficits is usually still borne by the employer, not plan members. In Ontario, DB plan members have the additional protection of the PBGF, underfunded though it is.

Members of multi-employer pension plans (MEPPs) aren’t so lucky. Many are more poorly funded than singleemployer pension plans, in part due to vague, uncertain and unique funding rules applicable only to MEPPs in jurisdictions like Ontario. In most Canadian provinces (except Quebec), it is legally permissible to reduce accrued benefits in a MEPP if there are insufficient assets to provide the promised benefits. But two factors stand in the way—influencing boards of trustees to hide the problems in MEPPs and postponing the inevitable reduction of benefits that is all but certain to occur. The adverse public relations implications associated with reducing previously promised pension benefits are one factor. The other is the reluctance of employers who participate in MEPPs to increase pension contribution amounts above levels negotiated in collective bargaining.

In the recent high-profile case of the Participating Cooperatives of Ontario Trusteed Pension Plan, the board of trustees—whose assets are valued at only half its liabilities— was sued in a class action lawsuit after deciding to terminate the plan. The board had realized there was virtually no hope the plan’s funding problems could be solved. Stay tuned for more bad news about MEPPs.

Shifting Responsibility

How can employers best deal with these burdensome issues? One solution, which is currently attracting headlines, is to replace existing DB pension plans with defined contribution (DC) or other capital accumulation plan arrangements, thereby attempting to shift both investment risk and responsibility for ensuring adequate future retirement income away from the pension plan sponsor and onto pension plan members. Hong Kong-based Trinity Time Investment, the equity investor chosen as Air Canada’s saviour, has proposed replacing Air Canada’s DB pension plans with new DC pension schemes, while grandfathering certain existing DB members. Air Canada’s unions have protested and it is too early to tell how this battle will be resolved. But the trend away from DB pension plan design and toward DC plan design has been well established in the U.S. and more recently in Canada and it will continue.

Another measure of pension relief that Air Canada has requested is a change in the current legal requirement to fund its pension solvency deficit over five years. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), the federal pension regulator with jurisdiction over Air Canada’s pension plans, has signaled its willingness to support a request to the federal government to provide this relief, which would mirror similar pension regulation concessions proposed for airlines and other struggling industries in the U.S. If this reprieve is granted, it is possible a similar one will also be granted to a wider group of pension plan sponsors than Air Canada.

Another change to look for will be to the current pension accounting rules. Demands for increased transparency will force corporations to recognize in their financial statements pension fund investment losses and pension deficits much more quickly than in the past.

Because actuarial reports for DB plans are only required, in most cases, every three years, many corporations have not yet had to face the consequences of the adverse experience over the last three years. Air Canada’s most recently filed actuarial reports for many of its several pension plans revealed surpluses; for this reason, the airline was not making contributions to most of its pension plans. That was until OSFI took the unusual step in early 2003 of ordering Air Canada to resume making contributions to its pension plans prior to the expiry of the triennial actuarial valuation period. Based on OSFI’s own analysis, the pension surplus had disappeared.

As the triennial valuation periods expire and pension accounting rules are tightened, corporations will be faced with substantially increased pension cash contribution requirements and higher pension expense charges on their income statements. This will in turn cause them to seek changes to their pension plans to reduce these increased costs and charges. In addition to conversions of DB plans to DC plans, expect various design changes to existing DB plans such as reduced early retirement incentives, reduction or elimination of ad hoc improvements, increased member contribution requirements and other cost-saving measures. Many in the pension community also believe that pressure must be brought to bear on governments to change pension laws to ease the current rules in most jurisdictions requiring amortization of solvency deficits over five years.

In extreme cases, corporations facing insolvency will be forced to deal with their pension fund problems through insolvency restructuring procedures. For insolvent plan sponsors whose underfunded pension plans are registered in Ontario, the possibility of PBGF funding of pension deficits provides, in effect, an additional source of financing to support a restructuring. Any claims made by currently insolvent sponsors may portend more of such PBGF claims in cases where corporations are being restructured in Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings. Increased employer PBGF assessments, or other more drastic PBGF changes, are likely to be forthcoming as a result.

Change is inevitable. And the pension problems described here will cause hardship for many. However, pension obligations are increasing in importance as our population grows more wealthy and ages. For too long, governments, unions and pension plan sponsors have ignored the need for change. Perhaps years from now we will look upon the current events as the motivating force that caused those in the position to effect change to recognize the problems and address them by accomplishing the necessary legal, funding and accounting changes. BC

David Vincent is a pension lawyer and Scott Bomhof is an insolvency lawyer. Both are partners of Torys LLP in Toronto.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions