Canada: Sober Second Thought: Supreme Court Rules On Random Drug And Alcohol Testing

Organizations and employees alike should take note of the long awaited ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) in Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper, Limited, which was released on Friday, June 14, 2013. Irving is the first decision from Canada's highest court to consider random drug and alcohol testing in the workplace.

The SCC attempted to confine its reasons to the unionized context in which Irving arose. However, the court's comments regarding the status of drug and alcohol testing in the workplace, the balance between workplace safety and employee privacy, and the need for employers to justify the implementation of drug and alcohol testing policies even in dangerous work environments, may have broader implications that extend to both union and non-union workplaces. Further, although the facts of Irving concerned random alcohol testing, the court's reasons appear to encompass random drug testing as well.

The court in Irving held that a dangerous work environment does not provide automatic justification for an employer's unilateral imposition of universal random testing. Instead, employers must be able to justify random testing policies on the basis of safety risks in the workplace environment, most notably by way of evidence of a general problem of drug or alcohol abuse in the workplace.

The Road to the SCC

On February 1, 2006, Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd. (Irving) unilaterally adopted a policy of mandatory random alcohol testing by way of breathalyzer for employees in safety sensitive positions. Shortly after the policy's adoption, an Irving employee was randomly selected and tested. Although the test revealed that the employee had a blood alcohol level of zero, the employee grieved to challenge the policy.

The arbitration board charged with hearing the employee grievance (the Board) found that Irving had failed to establish a need for the policy because it had not adduced sufficient evidence of prior alcohol-related impaired work performance incidents. The Board differentiated between "dangerous" and "ultra-dangerous" work environments – for example, nuclear plants, airlines, railways or chemical plants – with "ultra-dangerous" environments attracting a lighter burden for the employer in justifying the implementation of a random testing policy without evidence of a pre-existing alcohol problem in the workplace. The Board found that Irving's mill was only "dangerous" and not "ultra-dangerous".

The Board's decision was set aside by the application judge of the Court of Queen's Bench, who found the distinction between "dangerous" and "ultra-dangerous" work environments to be unreasonable. The application judge further opined that, once the Board found the work environment to be "dangerous", the only issue left for consideration was whether the policy was defensible as being proportionate to the potential danger. Commenting on the minimally intrusive nature of breathalyzer testing and the fact that testing was limited to employees in safety sensitive positions, the application judge concluded that the grievance should be dismissed.

The Court of Appeal considered the union's position that sufficient evidence of pre-existing alcohol problems in the workplace is a necessary pre-condition to the implementation and enforcement of random testing policies, unless the work environment is properly characterized as "ultra-dangerous". The Court of Appeal rejected this position and dismissed the appeal, holding that "[e]vidence of an existing alcohol problem in the workplace is unnecessary once the employer's work environment is classified as inherently dangerous" (para. 52). The court observed that employers engaged in the mining, forestry, and oil and gas sectors of the economy have successfully persuaded arbitrators that their operations qualify as "inherently dangerous", concluding that the kraft paper mill at issue should be similarly categorized. In support of this conclusion, the court commented on the mill's use of chemicals and hazardous materials, and the presence of a pressure boiler with a high potential for explosion.

Leave to appeal to the SCC was granted and a hearing was held in December 2012. There was much speculation amongst counsel and industry as to the breadth of the commentary that would result from the court's decision in Irving.

The SCC Decision

The SCC noted at the outset of its decision in Irving that the workplace at issue was governed by a collective agreement that did not provide for random alcohol testing. Therefore, the court defined the issue before them as pertaining to interpretation of the broad management rights clause in the collective agreement. In analyzing the scope of management's power to unilaterally impose rules in the workplace, the court noted, based on well-established arbitral jurisprudence, that exercise of such power must be reasonable as measured by a "balancing of interests" approach. In the context of drug and alcohol testing, such approach engages concerns of workplace safety on the one side and employee privacy on the other.

With respect to workplace safety, the court relied on a consensus in the arbitral jurisprudence indicating that it is not enough that testing is implemented in a dangerous workplace. Instead, as the court made clear, recognition of the dangerousness of the work environment at issue is only the starting point for the inquiry; as stated by the court at para. 31, "What has been additionally required is evidence of enhanced safety risks, such as evidence of a general problem with substance abuse in the workplace."

On the privacy side of the equation, the court described as "unassailable" the Board's conclusion that breathalyzer testing "effects a significant inroad" on privacy by causing a loss of liberty and personal autonomy (paras. 49-50). The court further cited a number of criminal decisions decided on the basis of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in which the SCC described the highly intrusive nature of seizing bodily samples.

The SCC concluded that the Board properly applied the "arbitral consensus" as to the applicable legal framework in this area of the law and arrived at a reasonable decision in holding that Irving had exceeded the scope of its management rights under the applicable collective agreement by imposing random alcohol testing without evidence of a workplace problem with alcohol use.

Initial Implications and Takeaways

Certainly non-union employers will press hard to say that Irving is limited to the labour context, and possibly restricted to random alcohol testing. However, there are indications that the decision will have broader implications, most notably the court's comments at para. 20 referring to the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Entrop v. Imperial Oil Ltd. in 2000: "even in a non-unionized workplace, an employer must justify the intrusion on privacy resulting from random testing by reference to the particular risks in a particular workplace. There are different analytic steps involved, but both essentially require attentive consideration and balancing of the safety and privacy interests."

Further, the court's strong language around the protection given to employee privacy, including reliance on cases decided under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, despite the absence of any government action, suggests that employee privacy will feature prominently in any future dispute regarding drug and alcohol testing.

Employers in both union and non-union environments should therefore be prepared going forward to justify random testing initiatives on the basis of evidence of a general drug or alcohol problem in the workplace, and to respond in a fulsome way to arguments regarding the intrusiveness of such testing initiatives on employee privacy.

Irving provides little guidance with respect to the degree of seriousness of a drug or alcohol problem in the workplace that is required to justify random testing. The court's decision suggests that it is reasonable to hold that "only" eight documented incidents of alcohol consumption or impairment in the workplace over a period of 15 years is insufficient. Nor was the deterrence value of random testing given real consideration. It may be that it will take a serious string of fatalities or truly catastrophic workplace incident before workplace safety is given greater consideration in the face of employee privacy concerns. This may be a call to action for the legislative branch of the provincial governments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions