Canada: Phase 2 Of The Modernization Of Investment Fund Product Regulation Project – Closed-End Funds

CSA proposes investment restrictions for closed-end funds

This is the third in a series of McMillan bulletins relating to the Canadian Securities Administrators project to modernize the regulation of publicly offered investment funds. The bulletins will separately address how the modernization project affects different types of investment fund products. The previous bulletin focused on the changes affecting open-end mutual funds. This bulletin will focus on the proposed introduction of investment restrictions affecting non-redeemable investment funds (closed-end funds or CEFs). A future bulletin will focus on proposed core operational requirements and prohibitions on paying organizational costs by closed-end funds.

As discussed in our recent bulletin, on March 27, 2013 the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published for comment proposed changes to the regulatory regime governing investment funds pursuant to Phase 2 of its Modernization of Investment Fund Product Regulation Project (the Modernization Project). The proposed changes, which reflect the first stage of Phase 2 of the Modernization Project, are largely aimed at bringing certain closed-end funds into the regulatory framework that governs open-end mutual funds by introducing core operational requirements and investment restrictions that did not previously exist for closed-end funds.

The central focus of Phase 2 is to address perceived market efficiency, investor protection and fairness issues that arise out of the different regulatory requirements applicable to investment funds by implementing investment restrictions and operational requirements for CEFs. While CEFs are subject to many of the same continuous disclosure, prospectus and independent review committee requirements as other publicly-offered investment funds, traditionally few investment restrictions and operational requirements have been applied to CEFs. In addition to investor protection and fairness issues, the CSA cite a key aspect of the Phase 2 amendments is to "level the playing field" among CEFs and open-end mutual funds (as well as exchange-traded funds) by reducing the potential for regulatory arbitrage.

In this installment in our series of bulletins and updates on the Modernization Project, we summarize and discuss the expected impact of core investment restrictions proposed to be applied to CEFs.

Background to investment restrictions

In response to the CSA's request for comments on the implementation of the Modernization Project published in 20111 many commenters expressed the view that investment restrictions should not be adopted for CEFs as it would impede their ability to offer investors returns associated with different asset classes and innovative investment strategies. However, the CSA have taken the position that such distinctions do not provide a sufficient policy basis for the lack of investment restrictions and propose to make CEFs subject to the restrictions and practices contained in National Instrument 81-102 Mutual Funds (NI 81-102) which currently apply to open-end mutual funds, with certain modifications to account for the differences in these types of funds. In the CSA's view, these requirements establish basic fundamental parameters for offering pooled investments to retail investors, promote prudent management and prohibit strategies that are not consistent with passive investment vehicles. The CSA observed that many CEFs have typically adopted similar investment restrictions which reflect best practices in the industry. The CSA view the principal differences between mutual funds and CEFs as being the manner in which they distribute securities (continuous distribution versus one time offerings and subsequent re-openings), the redemption rights they offer securityholders (redemptions on demand versus only an annual redemption at a fund's net asset value (NAV)), and the dealers that sell their securities (individual mutual fund dealers versus a syndicate of investment dealers).

We note that the proposed investment restrictions are intended to apply to CEFs that employ conventional investment strategies and that the CSA are proposing to redesign National Instrument 81-104 Commodity Pools (NI 81-104), which currently governs commodity pools, to establish a regime for "alternative funds" that will encompass both mutual funds and CEFs that use investment strategies that are not permitted under NI 81-102 (a topic that will be explored in a future bulletin).

Concentration restriction of 10%

The CSA propose to extend the "concentration restriction" in NI 81-102 to CEFs, which would prohibit these funds from purchasing securities of an issuer, entering into specified derivatives transactions or purchasing index participation units if, immediately after the transaction, more than 10% of the fund's net assets would be invested in the securities of such issuer (measured by market value at the time of the transaction). The concentration restriction would not apply to purchases of government securities, securities issued by clearing corporations, index participation units issued by an investment fund or securities of other investment funds (purchased in accordance with the fund-of-fund restrictions in NI 81-102).

The proposed changes would permit CEFs that are "fixed portfolio funds" to exceed the 10% limit for purchases of equity securities in accordance with their investment objectives. A "fixed portfolio fund" would include a closed-end fund with a fundamental investment objective of holding a fixed portfolio of publicly traded equity securities of issuers named in its prospectus.

In determining compliance with the concentration restriction, a closed-end fund would be required to include in its calculations the underlying interest of a long position in a specified derivative as well as its proportionate share of securities represented by an index participation unit, unless: (a) such underlying interest represents less than 10% of a stock or bond index; or (b) such securities represent less than 10% of securities represented by an index participation unit. A closed-end fund would not be required to include the underlying interests of specified derivatives held for hedging purposes.

We note that the concentration restriction applies at the time of the transaction. If the market value of the assets changes, the fund may continue to hold them indefinitely.

The CSA seek comment on whether a 10% concentration restriction is appropriate for CEFs and, if not, why a higher limit would be appropriate and how it would benefit CEFs. The CSA notes that many CEFs appear to have already adopted a 10% concentration restriction for minimum diversification as a best practice in the industry. In addition, certain CEFs typically impose a 10% concentration restriction in order to satisfy one of the conditions necessary to be a "mutual fund trust" for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada), which status entitles those funds to certain favourable tax treatment and ensures that their units are "qualified investments" for registered plans such as RRSPs or TFSAs.

How much liquidity do they really need?

The CSA also propose to impose a restriction on investing in illiquid assets on CEFs, although they propose to allow them to hold more illiquid assets than currently permitted for open-end mutual funds. This is an example of the CSA recognizing that CEFs are structurally different from mutual funds in how they provide liquidity for securityholders.

Currently, mutual funds are prohibited from purchasing an illiquid asset if more than 10% of the fund's net assets (measured by market value at the time of the purchase) would consist of illiquid assets. Furthermore, if the market value of the fund's assets change in a way that results in illiquid assets representing 15% or more of the fund's net assets, it must reduce its illiquid assets to below 15% within 90 days. An "illiquid asset" is an asset that cannot be readily disposed of through market facilities at a price that at least approximates the amount at which it is valued in calculating the NAV of the fund. Restricted securities are also considered to be illiquid assets.

While the CSA propose to increase the limit on illiquid assets applicable to mutual funds when it comes to CEFs (as they generally do not offer regular redemptions at NAV and in theory need less liquidity in their portfolios), they expressed concern about a portfolio containing significant illiquid assets which may cause difficulties in calculating NAV. The CSA noted that management, performance and other fees paid by an investment fund are all based on NAV.

The CSA observed that many CEFs do not invest in substantial amounts of illiquid assets in any event and seek comments with respect to the appropriate limit on illiquid assets for CEFs, as well as whether a time period greater than 90 days would be appropriate to divest of illiquid assets if they exceed the imposed limit. The CSA also invites comments as to whether the limit on illiquid assets should be different for CEFs that do not offer any redemptions and funds that offer annual redemptions.

To borrow or not to borrow – from whom and how much?

Open-end mutual funds are prohibited from borrowing cash except for specified purposes. The CSA propose to impose a limit on borrowing by CEFs of up to 30% of the fund's NAV, noting that current industry practice appears to limit cash borrowings to between 10% and 33% of NAV.

The proposed change would only permit CEFs to borrow from Canadian financial institutions (i.e., banks, loan corporations, trust companies and certain other financial institutions authorized to carry on business in Canada or a province or territory). The CSA noted that requiring a lender to be a Canadian financial institution could provide additional monitoring and controls over borrowing by CEFs.

The Phase 2 amendments would generally limit the leverage that could be utilized by CEFs to cash borrowing. NI 81-102, as proposed to be amended, would not permit CEFs to create leverage through the use of specified derivatives or short selling. If implemented as currently proposed, there would be a significant number of existing CEFs that would be offside the proposed restrictions relating to borrowing and use of leverage.

The CSA invite comments on whether the restriction on borrowing by CEFs is appropriate. The CSA also seek comments as to whether the requirement that the lender is a Canadian financial institution is appropriate or whether there should be greater flexibility to borrow from other lenders if, for example, a majority of a fund's assets are held outside Canada. We suspect that the proposal to restrict lenders to Canadian financial institutions might cause extra-territorial controversy from a market fairness perspective.

Investing in other funds, but not closed-end funds

Another proposed change is to impose the fund-of-fund requirements of NI 81-102 on CEFs with respect to investing in mutual funds. Under the CSA proposal, CEFs would not be permitted to invest in other CEFs due to the possibility of having resulting leverage greater than 30% (see above).

NI 81-102 contains a set of rules governing mutual funds that invest solely or primarily in other mutual funds (i.e., fund-of-funds). Generally, mutual funds are only permitted to invest in another mutual fund if the other mutual fund offers securities under a simplified prospectus and is a reporting issuer. In addition, the other mutual fund may not hold more than 10% of its NAV in securities of other mutual funds. Although, NI 81-102 provides an exemption from this requirement for so-called "three-tiered" fund-of-fund structures, provided that: (a) the top fund is a clone fund; or (b) the other mutual fund (second tier) is a money market fund or a mutual fund that issues index participation units.

The CSA note that the investment restrictions applicable to mutual funds are generally more restrictive than what is being proposed for CEFs. With this in mind, the CSA seek comments as to what measures would be appropriate in a fund-of-fund structure to enable an underlying mutual fund to invest in accordance with the investment restrictions applicable to a top fund that is a closed-end fund. In addition, under the proposed amendments, the underlying mutual fund would have to be a reporting issuer in every jurisdiction in which the top fund is a reporting issuer, and the CSA also seek comments in this regard.2

In light of the Federal Government's budget announcement on March 21, 2013, which included proposed measures that effectively put an end to "character conversion transactions" (see our bulletin on the subject here), it is unclear what the future holds for fund-of-fund structures.

Restrictions on certain types of securities – mortgages and physical commodities

The proposed Phase 2 amendments would impose restrictions on CEFs with respect to investing in mortgages and physical commodities.

The CSA propose no limit on investments in mortgages by CEFs, although any such investments would be restricted to mortgages that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by a government or government agency. CEFs would not be permitted to invest in non-guaranteed mortgages (the CSA noted that such investments may not be appropriate for publicly offered investment funds). The CSA observed that there is currently a limited number of CEFs with investment objectives of investing in non-guaranteed mortgages, and they propose a 24 month transition period for these funds to divest their holdings of non-guaranteed mortgages or transition into the regulatory regime for issuers that are not investment funds. The CSA seek comments on the impact of the proposed restriction and the appropriate length of the transition period, as well as whether a grandfathering provision would be warranted.

The CSA also propose to limit investments by a closed-end fund in physical commodities or permitted gold certificates (or specified derivatives the underlying interests of which are physical commodities or permitted gold certificates), to an amount equal to 10% of the fund's net asset value. The CSA are not seeking specific comments relating to this proposed restriction, but do note that closed-end funds that wish to focus on physical commodities or derivatives that provide exposure to physical commodities may choose to be "alternative funds" and regulated under a redesigned version of NI 81-104.

Restrictions on securities lending, repurchases and reverse repurchases

The CSA propose to apply the same investment restrictions relating to securities lending, repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions applicable to mutual funds to CEFs as well. These requirements govern documentation, supervision, controls and records and prescribe who is permitted to act as a fund's agent, the value of cash or other collateral a fund must hold in order to support such activities, and the permitted aggregate value of such transactions. Currently, the aggregate market value of securities loaned under securities lending transactions or sold in repurchase transactions may not exceed 50% of the fund's total assets (excluding collateral and cash received for the sold securities). The provisions of NI 81-102 mandate the appointment of a lending agent to administer a securities lending or repurchase transactions, but it is not strictly required for reverse repurchases.

The CSA have proposed amendments to NI 81-102 that would limit the amount of securities loaned or sold in securities lending, repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions by a closed-end fund to 50% of the NAV of the fund, rather than the current 50% of the total assets. As a result, CEFs would be unable to include any borrowed funds in determining the maximum value of securities that may be loaned or sold in connection with such transactions. The impact of these proposed amendments may be considerable for CEFs (in light of the proposal to permit them to borrow up to 30% of NAV) as the changes will reduce the amount of securities available to be loaned or sold by the liabilities (including leverage) of the closed-end fund.

Under the proposed amendments, prior to entering into any securities lending, repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions, CEFs would be required to issue a news release containing prescribed disclosure and securityholders would have to be provided with 60 days prior written notice before the fund enters into such transactions.

The CSA are seeking feedback on recommended approaches to ensure that financial statements of an investment fund provide adequate disclosure about the revenue and costs of securities lending transactions, including the share of revenue paid to the lending agent. Specifically, the CSA have requested comments on various measures that they propose to require as additional disclosure in an investment fund's management reports of fund performance, as well as the usefulness of adding the lending agent to the list of service providers detailed in an investment fund's prospectus or annual information form and information on indemnities obtained by an investment fund from the lending agent. The CSA also seek feedback on whether the agreements entered into between an investment fund and a lending agent should be required to be filed on SEDAR.

Transition periods

As noted above, in the first stage of Phase 2, the CSA propose certain core operational requirements and investment restrictions for CEFs. The CSA note that the proposed core operational requirements would come into force in advance of the proposed investment restrictions, which would be expected to come into effect at the same time as the "alternative fund framework" that would see changes to NI 81-104.

The CSA propose that there would be an 18-month transition period for existing CEFs to comply with the new investment restrictions after the coming into force of the Phase 2 amendments. New CEFs established after the coming into force date would have to comply immediately. The CSA also seek comments on whether a grandfathering provision for existing CEFs would be appropriate.

Next steps

The deadline for submitting comments to the CSA on the proposed amendments in Phase 2 is June 25, 2013. Please contact one of the authors of this bulletin listed below or another member of our Investment Funds & Asset Management Group if you have any questions or seek assistance with the preparation of a comment letter relating to these proposals.


1 CSA Staff Notice 81-322 Status Report on the Implementation of the Modernization of Investment Fund Product Regulation Project and Request for Comment on Phase 2 Proposals (Staff Notice 81-322).

2 Securities regulators have granted exemptive relief from the fund-of-fund requirements on a case-by-case basis to permit the underlying mutual fund to only become a reporting issuer in Québec (or Québec and Ontario), while the top mutual fund would be a reporting issuer in every province and territory. Although closed end-funds were not subject to the fund-of-fund requirements of NI 81-102, underlying funds in two-trust structures have traditionally become reporting issuers in Québec (or Québec and Ontario).

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2013 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Kimberly Poster
Michael Burns
Jason A. Chertin
Alison Kim
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.