Canada: The Nature And Priority Of "Bank Act" Security

Bank Act Security

Section 427 of the Bank Act1 provides a comprehensive scheme for the giving of security over certain assets (usually inventory) from certain types of borrowers. The current scheme has existed in substantially similar form since its enactment in 1890.2 Sections 425-436 of the current Bank Act are similar to ss. 82 and 86-90 of earlier Bank Acts and ss. 177-180, 186-187 and 189 of the previous Bank Act3. This scheme was designed to facilitate the development of the natural resource industry in Canada through secured lending.4 Courts have held that ss. 425-436, and its predecessors, should be interpreted in a "fair, large and liberal" manner to "best ensure the attainment of the object of the Act."5

Requirements for Valid Security

The types of borrowers permitted for the purposes of Bank Act security are set out in s. 427(1). It provides that a bank may advance money to, among others, purchasers and dealers in natural products, manufacturers, aqualculturists, and farmers on the security of specific items such as crops and livestock or for the purchase of seed, fertilizer, agricultural implements and equipment.

Bank Act security must be registered in accordance with the provisions set out in ss. 427(4)-(6). Clause 427(4)(a) provides that a "notice of intention" must be registered in the appropriate agency not more than three years before the security is given. Failure to register makes the security void against subsequent creditors or purchasers of the property acting in good faith.

In sum, s. 427 security is generally comprised of four elements:

  1. an application for credit;
  2. a notice of intention;
  3. a grant of security of inventory; and
  4. an agreement concerning loans and advances.

The Nature of the Security and its Priority

Subsection 428(1) provides that the giving of security under s. 427 is "the same as if the bank had acquired a warehouse receipt or bill of lading" and has "priority over all rights subsequently acquired in, on or in respect of that property."

The combined effect of ss. 427(1), 427(2) and 428 is to transfer the title of the subject property to the bank, thereby giving the bank all the right and title to the property enjoyed by the previous holder. Where the holder was the owner, then the bank will likely have full title, but where the holder had some lesser interest, then the bank will get that lesser interest.6 This puts the bank "in the position of a mortgagee holding the legal title subject to the borrower's right of redemption."7 Accordingly, Bank Act security has been commonly compared to a chattel mortgage. In Royal Bank v. Nova Scotia (Workmen's Compensation Board)8 the court described Bank Act security in the following manner:

... the security did not operate to transfer absolutely the ownership in the goods but that the transaction was essentially a mortgage transaction and subject to the general law of mortgages except where the statute has otherwise expressly provided ... Section 88 [now 427] set up by the Bank Act enables manufacturers, who desire to obtain large loans from their bankers in order to carry on their industrial activities, to give to the bank a special and convenient form of security for the bank's protection in the large banking transactions necessary in the carrying on of industry throughout the country. Until the moneys are repaid, the bank is the legal owner of the goods but sale before default is prohibited and provision is made for the manufacturer regaining title upon repayment. To say that Parliament did not use language to expressly provide that the bank shall have a first lien on the goods is beside the mark. The bank acquires ownership in the goods by the statute.9

Priority between Bank Act Security and PPSA Security

The most difficult priority problems that courts have struggled to resolve have involved priorities between Bank Act security and security under the various provincial personal property statutes.

With respect to determining the priority of Bank Act security vis-à-vis a registered or perfected security under the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario)10, the common law "first in time" rule applies. This means that Bank Act security will be subordinate to PPSA security if the PPSA interest is perfected prior to the bank taking its security interest.11 The reason for this is twofold. First, as mentioned above, a bank can receive no greater interest in the property than the debtor himself has. Once a PPSA security interest in the property is registered, a debtor no longer has unfettered interest with respect to that property. Second, registration provides a way for banks to gain knowledge of the existence of a prior PPSA security interest.

With respect to the priority between Bank Act security and an unregistered or unperfected PPSA security, two Supreme Court of Canada decisions concluded that the latter has priority, if obtained prior to the bank's security.12

Following these two decisions, there was concern that banks would be exposed to PPSA security interests which they would have no way of discovering.

As a result, the Minister of Finance introduced Senate Bill S-5, entitled the Financial Systems Review Act, in November 2011. In our newsletter dated March 2012, we provided an update on the status of Senate Bill S-5, the effect of which would be to amend the Bank Act and overturn the two Supreme Court of Canada decisions.

The Financial Systems Review Act received royal assent on March 29, 2012 and became law on May 24, 2012. It expressly provides that s. 427 security will have priority over the rights of "any person who had a security interest in that property that was unperfected at the time the bank acquired its security in the property." Subsection 425(1) was also amended by broadening the definition of the term "unperfected" to include a security interest that has not been registered under the law which the security interest was created.

The amendments also created an exception to a bank's priority if the bank has "knowledge" of the prior unperfected security interest. While the PPSA provides a definition of "knowledge", the Bank Act is silent on this issue. As a result of this ambiguity, banks should tread cautiously when discussing finances with a debtor so as to avoid inadvertently obtaining what may be construed as "knowledge".

Priority between Bank Act Security and Landlord's Right of Distraint

When it comes to Bank Act security and a landlord's right of distraint, who has priority? The short answer is that the bank will have priority if its security is obtained prior to the tenant being in arrears of rent.

Two court decisions have provided guidance in this area. In International Wood Products Ltd. v. Royal Bank13, the Ontario High Court confirmed that s. 89(1) [now s. 428] gives priority to the bank's security acquired pursuant to s. 427 over "all rights subsequently acquired in, on or in respect of" the property of a debtor.14 The Court held that a landlord's right of distraint is a right "in, on or in respect of" the property, and as a result, if the arrears of rent (and thus the right of distraint) arises before the s. 427 security is taken, the bank's security under s. 427 will be subordinate to the landlord's rights.15 Similarly, if the tenant is in arrears at the time the bank obtains s. 427 security and the tenant continues to default in payment of rent after the security is granted, the landlord will continue to have priority over the bank with respect to all of the rental arrears. This is because a landlord's right of distraint is only "lost" once the total amount of arrears is paid.16

In contrast, if security is obtained by the bank before the tenant enters into arrears, the bank's security will have priority. This is because the tenant no longer holds title to the assets. Accordingly, the landlord's right of distraint cannot attach to the tenant's assets once title has passed to the bank.17 This was the finding by the Quebec Court of Appeal in Fermo's Creations Inc. Re18.

Priority between two Bank Act Securities

Although Bank Act security is equivalent to the taking of title in the borrower's property, more than one bank can take security over the borrower's property, regardless of whether it is the same property or not.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal considered this issue and held that priority between two banks is determined based on the "first in time" rule.

In Royal Bank v. Bank of Montreal19, a farmer - Mr. Dietz - borrowed money from the plaintiff and defendant banks and granted the banks s. 88 [now s. 427] security over his grain. The defendant, Bank of Montreal ("BMO"), had advanced three loans to the farmer – in August 1968, February 1969 and October 1969. The August 1968 loan was made for the express purpose of enabling Mr. Dietz to purchase a tractor.20 Schedule "F" of the security document described the property that was assigned as security as follows:

... the undersigned hereby assigns to the Bank as security for the payment of the said loan ... the property hereinafter described of which the undersigned is now or may hereafter become the owner, to wit, ...

All of my threshed grain and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following:

5000 bus wheat

1800 bus barley

and which is now or may hereafter be in the place or places hereinafter designated, to wit, ...

On or about my farmlands comprising ... (emphasis added)

The subsequent two loans advanced by BMO were also secured by Mr. Dietz's grain and the security documents were similarly worded as referenced above.

In July 1969, the plaintiff, Royal Bank of Canada ("RBC"), advanced a loan to Mr. Dietz and obtained s. 88 security over "all grain".21

The Court ultimately concluded that BMO's security had priority with respect to the August 1968 and February 1969 loans while RBC had priority with respect to the July 1969 loan (versus BMO's October 1969 loan).22 In its reasoning, the Court noted that BMO's initial security document which referred to specific grain owned by Mr. Dietz did not limit the scope of the security since the overall wording of the document made it clear that security was assigned over all of the grain.23

Similarly, in another decision, the Court stated the following24:

A first in time priority rule has also been applied in a priority dispute between two banks each claiming section 178 [now s. 427] security interests in after-acquired property.

Conclusion

Although Bank Act security is not as common as it once was, it is important that banks understand and appreciate the requirements for this type of security interest. If applicable, Bank Act security has priority over an unperfected or unregistered security interest under the PPSA, provided that the bank has no knowledge of such security, and has priority over a landlord's right of distraint, if obtained prior to the borrower defaulting on rent.

Similarly, when it comes to competing security interests between two banks, the first bank to properly register its security will have priority. Banks will want to be proactive and avoid situations where their security could be subordinate to another bank's rights. While this could theoretically be avoided by taking security over some other inventory belonging to the borrower, banks must be cautious in using this approach. As evidenced in Royal Bank v. Bank of Montreal, above, courts have taken a liberal approach to interpreting the descriptions of the security in the documents giving security.25 Though a bank may have the intention of securing a specific type of property, its security description may be interpreted broadly. Therefore, subsequent lenders should be cautious to avoid extending credit where the property provided for security may already be subject to a prior Bank Act security document.

Footnotes

1 Bank Act, S.C. 1991, c. 46 ["Bank Act"].

2 Bank of Montreal v. Innovation Credit Union, 2010 SCC 47, at para 14.

3 Ian F.G. Baxter, Law of Banking, 4th ed. (Toronto: Thomson Canada Limited, 1992 ) at 105 ["Law of Banking"].

4 Bank of Montreal v. Guaranty Silk Dyeing & Finishing Co., [1935] O.R. 493, 1935 CarswellOnt 91 (Ont. C.A.) at para. 24.

5 Ibid. at para. 25.

6 M.H. Ogilvie, Canadian Banking Law, 2nd ed. (Scarborough: Thomson Canada Limited, 1998) at 369 ["Canadian Banking Law"].

7 Law of Banking, supra, at 111.

8 Royal Bank v. Nova Scotia (Workmen's Compensation Board), [1936] S.C.R. 560, 1936 CarswellNS 44 (S.C.C.).

9 Ibid. at para. 18.

10 Personal Property Security Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.10 ["PPSA"].

11 See Bank of Montreal v. Innovation Credit Union, 2010 SCC 47 at para. 9.

12 Bank of Montreal v. Innovation Credit Union, 2010 SCC 47 and Royal Bank of Canada v. Radius Credit Union Ltd., 2010 SCC 28.

13 International Wood Products Ltd. v. Royal Bank, [1951] O.R. 642, 1951 CarswellOnt 71 (Ont. H.C.).

14 Ibid. at paras. 6-7.

15 Ibid. at para. 9.

16 George M. Valentini and Kristi Green, "Loss of Landlord's Right of Distress" in Harvey M. Haber, Distress: A Commercial Landlord's Remedy (Aurora: Canada Law Book Inc., 2001) at 81.

17 Also see Abraham Costin, "Priorities Between a Landlord's Right of Distress and Other Interests" in Who Takes Priority? Evaluating Lending and Security Practices: Lessons from a Recession (Toronto: Insight Press, 1993) at 7-8.

18 Fermo's Creations Inc. Re, (1969) 10 D.L.R. (3d) 560, 1969 CarswellQue 223 (Que. C.A.) at paras. 1-2 and 24-28.

19 Royal Bank v. Bank of Montreal, 1976 CarswellSask 55, [1976] 4 W.W.R. 721 (Sask. C.A.).

20 Ibid. at para. 2.

21 Ibid. at para. 8.

22 Ibid. at paras. 22, 25 and 28.

23 Ibid. at paras. 17 and 21.

24 Innovation Credit Union v. Bank of Montreal, 2009 SKCA 35, citing Moose Jaw (City) v. Pulsar Ventures Inc., [1988] 1 W.W.R. 250 (Sask. C.A.), at para. 22.

25 See Canadian Banking Law, supra, at 364.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions