Canada: In And Out: Ontario Superior Court Of Justice Redefines Certified Global Class To Exclude Members Of A Parallel U.S. Class Action

Last Updated: May 2 2013
Article by Wendy Berman and Jonathan Wansbrough

A recent decision by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Silver v. IMAX Corporation amended a previously certified global class to carve out approximately 85% of its members who were overlapping class members in a parallel U.S. action, which had conditionally settled. This decision, a first in Canadian securities class actions, is a significant development in multi-jurisdictional parallel class proceedings and indicates not only the court’s willingness to recognize foreign class settlements but also its willingness to significantly amend the class on the basis that an Ontario proceeding no longer remains the preferable procedure for that portion of the class.

This decision provides welcome comfort to public companies that, where appropriate, Ontario courts will recognize foreign settlements as binding on overlapping class members but will also likely have a significant impact on settlement dynamics. Although the decision arguably alleviates the pressure to reach a global coordinated settlement it may ultimately trigger a “race to settle” with different pressures.  

The IMAX case with a “certify now, worry later” approach to global classes deferred consideration of complex jurisdictional issues, including the reasonable expectations of overlapping class members, to a much later stage in the proceeding. This recent decision reducing the class in the Ontario proceedings by 85% sharply illustrates some of the legal and practical complexities of overlapping multi-jurisdictional class proceedings, including fairness, efficient use of resources and comity for both companies and investors in class actions. It remains to be seen whether this decision will ultimately temper enthusiasm for global classes in Canada. 


In 2006, parallel class proceedings were commenced in Canada and the United States against IMAX Corporation, a publicly traded Canadian company with its shares listed on both the TSX and NASDAQ, alleging material misrepresentations in its financial disclosure. In the United States, eight proposed class actions were commenced claiming relief under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and were ultimately consolidated into a single proceeding (the “U.S. Proceeding”).  In Canada, the class action commenced in Ontario asserted both common law claims and statutory claims under the secondary market liability regime in Part XXIII.1 of the Ontario Securities Act (the “Ontario Proceeding”).
Notably, the Ontario Proceeding was certified as a global class and included all persons who acquired IMAX shares on the TSX and the NASDAQ. Originally the plaintiff in the U.S. Proceeding also sought to certify a global class but was obliged to narrow the class definition to include only persons who acquired IMAX shares on the NASDAQ a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. National Australian Bank Ltd., which effectively mandates exclusion of purchasers of shares on any foreign exchanges from the U.S. class action regime. As result, there was a significant overlap between the Ontario and U.S. classes.

Although the Ontario Proceeding progressed more rapidly, the parties in the U.S. Proceeding settled first and entered into a settlement agreement in January 2012, for a total amount of US$12 million, inclusive of costs. Of interest to the Ontario court was the fact that despite the distribution of 87,000 notices of the proposed settlement, only one investor objected to the settlement and only seven opted out of the class settlement. The settlement was approved by the court in the U.S. conditional on the Ontario court amending the Ontario class definition to exclude the members of the U.S. class, being all NASDAQ purchasers. Shortly thereafter, IMAX, together with the other defendants in the Ontario Proceeding, brought a motion for an order amending the Ontario class definition to exclude those persons who would be bound by the settlement of the U.S. Proceeding.

The Decision

The Ontario court considered four primary issues in deciding whether to grant the defendants’ motion to amend the class definition, including: a) whether it had authority to amend the class to exclude the overlapping class members; b)  whether to recognize the U.S. settlement; c) whether the motion was, in effect, for the approval of a settlement under the Class Proceedings Act (CPA); and d) whether the Ontario Proceeding remained the “preferable procedure” for the overlapping class members given the finalization of the U.S. settlement.

a) The Court has Authority to Amend the Class Under the CPA

The Ontario court confirmed its authority under section 10(1) of the CPA to amend the class definition where, as a result of developments in the U.S. Proceeding, such proceeding no longer remained the “preferable procedure” for the determination of the claims of the overlapping class members who have not opted out of the U.S. settlement. Contrary to arguments raised by the plaintiff, the Ontario court concluded that the existence of the U.S. settlement was “clearly relevant to the question of whether the Ontario Action remains the preferable procedure” for resolving the claims of the overlapping class members.

b)  The U.S. Settlement Ought to be Recognized in the Ontario Proceeding

In determining whether to recognize the U.S. settlement, the court applied the factors set out by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Currie v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Ltd. (Currie), namely, whether:

  • the U.S. court had a “real and substantial connection” to the claims of the overlapping class members;
  • whether the overlapping class members were accorded procedural fairness, including adequate notice; and
  • whether the interests of the overlapping class members were adequately represented.

The court concluded that the U.S. settlement should be recognized as binding on the overlapping class members in the Ontario Proceeding as the U.S. court properly had jurisdiction, there was order and fairness in the treatment of the claims of the overlapping class members and in their representation in the U.S. Proceeding. With respect to the factor of procedural fairness and notice, the court noted that U.S. court considered the same factors in its determination of the fairness of the U.S. settlement as considered by Ontario courts in determining whether to approve the settlement of a class proceeding.

c) Review and Approval of the U.S. Settlement is Not Required

Despite the arguments advanced by the plaintiffs, the court declined to review the adequacy or fairness of the U.S. settlement as part of its consideration of whether to recognize the U.S. settlement.  Rather the court determined that, based on the Currie decision, the focus of its review was on the process that was followed in the U.S. Proceeding and whether that process adequately protected the interests of absent class members.  However, the court considered the adequacy of the U.S. settlement in its determination of whether the Ontario Proceeding remained the preferable procedure for a global class.

d) The Ontario Proceeding is No Longer the “Preferable Procedure” for the Overlapping  Class Members

The question of whether the Ontario Proceeding remains the “preferable procedure”, involves a consideration of whether it is preferable “to other ‘reasonably available means of resolving the class members’ claims” and having regard to the objectives of class proceedings, including: judicial economy, access to justice and behaviour modification.

The court compared the advantages and disadvantages associated with continuing the claim of the overlapping class members in its determination of whether it was the preferable procedure to amend the global class.  Importantly, and in contrast to its recognition of the U.S. settlement, the court did consider the adequacy of the U.S. settlement in this portion of its analysis, including expert evidence of both parties (the plaintiffs experts concluded the U.S. settlement provided a recovery of either 11% or 13% of the maximum value of the damages for NASDAQ purchasers).  The court found that the evidence did not establish that the U.S. settlement was improvident compared to the resolution of other class actions in this jurisdiction.

Notably, the court indicated two specific factors which, although not determinative, weighed in favour of granting an order removing overlapping class members:  (i) the U.S. court had a strong jurisdictional connection to the overlapping class members and “it would be consistent with the reasonable expectations of the overlapping class members, who acquired their shares on the NASDAQ, and in circumstances where IMAX was subject to both U.S. and Ontario securities laws, that their rights could be determined by the U.S. court in the context of applicable U.S. law.”  and (ii) the robust procedure followed by the U.S. court, including the fairness consideration of the U.S. settlement. 

The court determined that in these circumstances remaining in the global class would be of no clear advantage to the overlapping class members and that participation in the U.S. settlement would satisfy the objective of access to justice. Similarly, the court rejected an argument that there would be a negative effect on TSX purchasers by removing the NASDAQ purchasers from the global class due to the inherent risks associated with litigation, and since the TSX purchasers were made the same offer (proportionally) as the NASDAQ purchasers. In concluding that access to justice was not impeded, the court stated:

It is not the function of this court to seek to jealously guard its own jurisdiction over a class proceeding that has been certified here. Such an approach is inconsistent with the principles of comity. It is also not the function of the court to favour or to protect the interests of class counsel within this jurisdiction...

Ultimately, the court found that it was the preferable procedure to remove the claims of the overlapping class members from the Ontario Proceeding and granted the order amending the class definition to exclude NASDAQ purchasers. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Wendy Berman
Jonathan Wansbrough
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.