Canada: Fully Secured @ Gowlings - Volume 4 - Number 1

Last Updated: April 9 2013

Edited by Richard Dusome.

Ratification of Cape Town Convention by the Government of Canada: Its Effects on Aircraft Financing and Sale in the Majority of the Provinces and Territories in Canada

By: David Kierans, Marie-France Béland and Scott Loong (Montréal)

On December 12, 2012, the federal government of Canada passed legislation that, in conjunction with various provincial laws, ratified its signature to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment (the "Convention") and the Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters specific to Aircraft Equipment (the "Protocol" collectively with the Convention the "Cape Town Convention") which occurred on March 31, 2004. This ratification is subject to the declarations lodged by the Canadian government (the "Canada Declarations") amending and supplementing sections 39, 52, 53, 54 and 60 of the Convention and articles VIII, X, X(6) XII and XIII of the Protocol.

The Cape Town Convention requires, subject to the exceptions indicated therein and to the Canada Declarations, that a written security agreement, title reservation agreement, leasing agreement or  contract of sale1 involving a debtor situated2 in a contracting state of the Cape Town Convention (which now includes Canada), which creates an international interest3 or prospective international interest4 in aircraft equipment meeting certain size and power requirements,5 be published in the International Registry of Mobile Assets(the "IRMA") in order for such interest to be enforceable/perfected against third parties and for its priority to be established.

The Cape Town Convention will take effect on April, 1 2013 (the "Implementation Date") in Alberta, British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec and Saskatchewan. Although registration is not required for International Interests, Prospective International Interests or Non-Consensual Rights or Interest (within the meanings given to such terms in the Cape Town Convention) created before the Implementation Date, all such rights and interests created after the Implementation Date will need to be published in the IRMA. The priority of IRMA registrations is established on a "first to register" basis.

The one exception to this rule pertains to Pre-Existing Rights or Interests (within the meaning set forth in the Convention) governed by Sections 426 to 436 of the Bank Act (SC 1991, c 46). Such rights and interest have been given a five year grace period: up until April 1, 2018, such rights and interests will continue to be governed by the Bank Act.  However, after April 1, 2018 the Convention will apply for the purposes of determining priority, including the protection of any existing property.

In addition to the abovementioned exception, the Cape Town Convention and the Canada Declarations6 provide that the priority of Non-Consensual Interests (within the meaning set forth in the Cape Town Convention), such as those arising from a government decree or a legal judgment, will continue to have priority over International Interests as defined by the Convention.

At present, the states that have ratified the Cape Town Convention include, but are not limited to, Canada, the United States, Brazil, New Zealand, Mexico, Norway, the United Arab Emirates and Russia. It should be noted however that several western countries including France, Germany, Switzerland, Italy and the United Kingdom have not ratified the Cape Town Convention.

The ratification of the Cape Town Convention by the Government of Canada will greatly alter aircraft financing and sale regimes in the majority of Canadian provinces and territories. The law imposes new obligations for publication and, in practical terms, will require that IRMA searches be included among the standard publication searches conducted in the context of aircraft financing or sale transactions.

The law will also provide creditors with a range of basic default remedies and recourses. Where there is evidence of certain defaults, the Cape Town Convention provides a means of efficiently obtaining interim relief pending final determination of its claim on the merits, deregistration, repossession, sale, lease and export of aircraft equipment.

In light of the above, creditors should conduct a thorough review of their standard financing documents to ensure that the terms and conditions of the Cape Town Convention have been accounted for. For creditors, this will include ensuring that standard documents provide for all rights, recourses and remedies available under the new law.


1. Subject to the adaptations made pursuant to the Protocol.
2. For the purposes of the Convention, the country where a debtor is deemed to be situated is based on the law of which it is incorporated or formed; or where it has its registered office or statutory seat; or where it has its centre of administration; or  where it has its place of business.
3. Amendments, assignments, subordinations and subrogations relating to an international interest may also be published.
4. Section 19 of the Convention also allows for the registration of  "Prospective International Interests". A Prospective International Interests which becomes an International Interests is treated as if registered from the time that the Prospective International Interests was registered.
5. Section 1 of the Protocol and section 2 of the Convention establish the particular application of the Cape Town Convention.
6. See the Canada Declaration regarding section 39(a) of the Convention.

Important Change in the Sale Process in Québec

By: Julie Frégeau and André Rivest (Montréal)      

On January 17, 2013, Justice Carole Julien of the Superior Court rendered a decision that could have a substantial impact on sales under judicial authority.

In five (5) non contested matters, Justice Julien decided that the officer designated by the court to proceed with the sale could not be a representative of the law firm representing the lender. The court is of the view that someone from the law firm representing the lender does not have the distance required to conduct the sale on behalf of its client. Justice Julien is of the view that there is a conflict of interest.

In her judgment, Justice Julien does not suggest any particular person to be appointed officer to proceed with the sale; she did however put the files on hold for 30 days to allow the lenders to suggest the appointment of someone other than a representative of their lawyers' firms.

Finally, Justice Julien decided that unless it is justified, the upset price should be fixed at the municipal value as opposed to 75% of same, which is usually what is asked by lenders.

The decision has not been appealed and if it is followed, lenders will have considerably less control on the judicial sale process and costs will likely increase.

Considering this important change in the sale process, lenders should follow developments attentively.

Ontario: Declaration that Security Constituted Improper Preference Upheld on Appeal

By: Richard Dusome (Toronto)   

In an earlier edition of Fully Secured (June 27, 2012 – Volume 3, Number 2), we reported on the Ontario Court of Justice decision in Snoek7 where security granted by a borrower ("HSLP") to a group of individual creditors ("B") was held to constitute an improper preference and declared invalid following a challenge by the trustee in bankruptcy. B had been one victim of a Ponzi scheme involving numerous unsecured creditors of HSLP.

The security had been granted to B in the form of a transfer of an undivided interest in a registered mortgage asset held by HSLP. B was originally an unsecured creditor of HSLP that demanded the security following the occurrence of a payment default, and accepted extended payment terms on its debt in exchange for the granting of the security. The Ontario Court of Justice concluded that the security constituted an improper preference under Section 4 of the Assignments and Preferences Act8, and was not saved by one of the available exemptions under Section 5(1) or 5(5)(d) of the Act. 

In particular, the lower Court found that HSLP had clearly granted the security at a time when HSLP was insolvent with the clear intent to prefer B over other creditors of HSLP who were also demanding repayment from HSLP at the same time but did not receive similar security. Moreover, B had not shown the characterization of the security granted to it as an improper preference was saved by virtue of one of the exemptions available under Sections 5(1) or 5(5)(d) of the Act.  Specifically, the lower Court held that B had not proven that either (i) the security was granted for a present actual advance of money, or (ii) the security was granted for a pre-existing debt and B made a new advance to HSLP in the belief that the advance would enable HSLP to continue its business and pay its debts in full.

Madam Justice Mesbur stated that the Act requires an actual advance of money to satisfy the saving provisions, and noted that Section 5 did not expand the plain meaning of the term "money" or expressly contemplate any other types of consideration like money's worth or a forbearance. However, as she had questioned whether B's actions actually constituted a forbearance, she did not technically have to determine if a proper forbearance could in any circumstances be sufficient to qualify as an advance of money.

B appealed the decision of the motion judge to the Ontario Court of Appeal on two grounds:

  1. that there was no evidence of an intent to give B an unjust preference, and
  2. that Section 4 of the Act did not apply because the interest in the mortgage asset was granted by HSLP to B "as security for a present actual advance of money" within the meaning of Section 5(1) of the Act.

In a brief endorsement judgment9, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed both grounds of appeal. Firstly, the Court of Appeal held that the motion judge's finding that the interest in the mortgage asset was granted to B with the intent to give B an unjust preference over other creditors was amply supported by the record.10 The appellate Court also rejected B's argument that B had notionally advanced money to HSLP when it surrendered the existing promissory notes issued to it by HSLP in exchange for new notes issued to it on slightly different terms relating to the capitalization of interest, a reduction in the interest rate and an extension of the term.11 It then confirmed the lower Court's finding that the beneficial interest in the mortgage asset was not granted by HSLP to B as "security for a present actual advance of money" as required by Section 5(1) of the Act12, but it did not provide detailed analysis or reasons for doing so. As such, the Court of Appeal did not take the opportunity to specifically address whether a proper forbearance in demanding payment could in any circumstances be sufficient to qualify as an advance of money. Lenders must therefore continue to exercise caution in obtaining shore-up security after a borrower's default to ensure that proper consideration is received by the borrower for that delivery.


  7. Harry Snoek Limited Partnership (Re), 2011 ONSC 6667.
8. Assignments and Preferences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.A.3, as amended [the "Act"].
9. Harry Snoek Limited Partnership (Re), 2012 ONSC 765 [the "Appeal Judgment"].
10. Appeal Judgment, at paragraph 9.
11. Appeal Judgment, at paragraphs 6 and 10.
12. Appeal Judgment, at paragraph 10.

Hypothecs Not Denominated in Canadian Dollars Have Been Considered Invalid by the Québec Courts

By: Marie-France Béland and Scott Loong (Montréal)

For a hypothec to be considered valid under Québec law it is necessary that i) it be established for a particular amount and ii) such amount be precisely determinable in the deed of hypothec itself. Article 2689 of the Civil Code of Québec ("CCQ") establishes the requirement that a deed constituting a hypothec indicate the "specific sum" for which it is granted. This is true whether the underlying asset is movable (personal) or immovable (real) property.

The Québec courts have held that a critical nuance to the "specific sum" requirement imposed by article 2689 is that, in order to be considered specific, the sum of the hypothec must be indicated in Canadian dollars. Although it is possible to determine the exchange rate between US and Canadian currency at any given moment, Québec courts have held that fluctuations in such rates over time render the amount of a hypothec indicated in a foreign currency insufficiently precise and therefore not a "specific sum" in the meaning of article 2689 CCQ.

In Trans-America Trade Exchange Inc. v. Haltrecht, the Québec Court of Appeal upheld a lower court decision invalidating a hypothec on the grounds that it was not denominated in Canadian dollars. Similarly, in Caisse populaire Desjardins de Baie-Comeau v. Gérald Robitaille et Associés Ltée the Québec Superior Court held that because the amount of the hypothec was indicated in US dollars, it did not meet the precision requirements necessary for validity under Québec law. Indeed, this interpretation of the "specific sum" requirement is settled in Québec doctrine and jurisprudence and subsists regardless of whether the grantor of the hypothec intends or is bound to repay the amount in a foreign currency.

Legal practitioners in Canada's common law jurisdictions may note thatthis requirement is unique to the province of Québec. In circumstances where a Québec hypothec must be drafted to secure an amount owed in US currency, the generally accepted practice is to indicate a "specific sum" equivalent of 150% to 200% of the amount owed.

Indicating a "specific sum" that greatly exceeds the secured debt is bound to offend those unfamiliar with the civil law. For this reason, it is important to stress that doing so creates no additional risk or exposure for the grantor of the hypothec: Québec hypothecs are rights that are accessory to the secured debt and cannot be used to collect more than what is owed.

A Banker Asked Us: Pledges of Limited Partnership Unit Certificates

By: Richard Dusome (Toronto)


My Ontario corporate borrower holds certificates representing units of a limited partnership ("LP") within its corporate group. Can the bank take possession of those certificates to perfect a pledge of the LP units granted under a pledge agreement?


It depends upon whether the borrower's interest in the LP would be classified  as a "security", such that the unit certificates would be classified as "certificated securities" for purposes of both the Ontario Securities Transfer Act13 and the PPSA.14

Under Section 12 of the STA, an interest in a partnership is not a "security" unless (1)  that interest is publicly traded on a securities exchange or is a mutual fund security, or (2) the originating documents establishing the partnership expressly provide that the interest is a "security" for purposes of the STA (also known as an opt-in provision). 

Taking delivery and control of the unit certificates (together with an endorsed stock transfer power of attorney) will perfect a pledge in those certificates if they constitute "certificated securities".15  Having control of a "certificated security" provides the highest level of protection against other PPSA claims to that category of assets.16

However, if the borrower's interest in the LP does not meet the test of being classified as a "security", the borrower's interest in the LP will be classified as an "intangible" under the PPSA.  In that situation, the unit certificates would not be considered to be "certificated securities". Thus, possession of those unit certificates is largely irrelevant from a security perfection perspective. A security interest in an "intangible" may only be perfected by the registration of a financing statement.17 So even if the bank has possession of the unit certificates, you will still need to deal with any prior registered secured creditors shown on the PPSA register and obtain PPSA comfort letters or estoppel letters from them confirming that their registrations do not cover or extend to the borrower's interest in the LP.

Given the advantages associated with the characterization of an LP interest as a "security", the bank could consider requiring the borrower to arrange for the LP to amend its limited partnership agreement to include an STA opt-in provision before the pledge agreement is signed and before the unit certificates (together with an executed stock transfer power of attorney) are delivered to the bank.


13. Securities Transfer Act, 2006 S.O. 2006, c. 8 [the "STA"].
14. Personal Property Security Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 10, as amended [the "PPSA"]
15. Section 23(2) of the STA and Sections 1(2) and 22.1(1) of the PPSA.
16. Section 30.1(2) of the PPSA.
17. Section 22 of the PPSA.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.