Canada: Renewable Energy Approvals & Appeals For Wind & Solar Projects In Ontario

Last Updated: April 8 2013
Article by Sven Walker

RENEWABLE ENERGY APPROVAL PROCESS

In order to successfully develop wind power and ground-mount solar power generation facilities in Ontario, proponents must obtain a Renewable Energy Approval (REA) from the Ministry of the Environment ("MOE") as required by Ontario Regulation 359/09 made under the Environmental Protection Act. The steps required to obtain a Renewable Energy Approval are outlined in the following diagram:

Complete REA submissions are required in order for applications to be accepted.Once an application is considered complete and has been accepted (this is supposed to take up to 30 days but has taken more than 210 days in some cases) (the "Application Completeness Review Period"), the clock starts ticking on the 6 month service guarantee to reach a decision in respect of the REA application.It should be noted that while the MOE has implemented a 6 month service guarantee, a number of REA applications have taken much longer to process.Generally, REAs for wind power generation facilities take longer to process than REAs for ground-mounted solar projects, which often take less than 6 months to process. By delaying the Application Completeness Review Period by many months in certain instances, the MOE has managed to find a mechanism with which it is still able to meet its 6 month service guarantee.

Further information can be found in the MOE's presentation on the Renewable Energy Approval Process.

APPEAL PROCESS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TRIBUNAL

The REA process contains a third-party hearing mechanism.That means that upon the MOE issuing a REA, any resident in Ontario (including a corporation) may appeal the REA to the Environmental Review Tribunal ("ERT") and require a hearing with respect to the decision.The hearing process must be initiated within 15 days of the MOE's decision to issue the REA.Pursuant to Section 142.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, there are only two grounds which may be considered on appeal and the burden of proof lies with the appellant.The appellant must demonstrate that the approved project will either:

  1. Cause serious harm to human health; or
  2. Cause serious and irreversible harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment.

The ERT usually has six months to issue a decision once the appeal has been filed.If either of the above grounds is not established, the decision to approve the REA must be confirmed.

The appeal process is an expedited process. The party bringing the appeal should be ready for a preliminary hearing within four weeks of the start of the appeal and ready to proceed with a full hearing after a further four weeks.

The ERT's decisions can be further appealed within 30 days.Appeals on any matter other than a question of law must be made in writing to the Minister of the Environment.The Minister of the Environment will then confirm, alter, or revoke the decision of the ERT.An appeal with respect to a question of law may be made to the Ontario Divisional Court in accordance with the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure.

More information on the appeal process can be found in the ERT publication: A Guide to Appeals by Members of the Public regarding Renewable Energy Approvals under section 142.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.

EXAMPLES OF APPEALS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TRIBUNAL

The following chart outlines some of the appeals that have been heard by the ERT.

Type of Renewable Fuel

Description of the Appeal

Wind

Name of Case: Hanna v. Ontario (Attorney General)

Issues: Challenge to the Renewable Energy Approvals Regulation, specifically whether the minimum setback requirements for wind turbines were inadequate.

Date of Decision of ERT on Appeal: January 24, 2011 (Decision by the Superior Court, Divisional Court)

Decision: The Superior Court dismissed the application, finding that there had been a full public consultation period and that there was a review of science-based evidence.Further, minimum setbacks in a particular decision can be challenged before the ERT; therefore, those concerned have an alternative remedy.

Application dismissed.

Wind

Size of the Project: 8 Wind Turbines x 2.5 MW each = 20 megawatt (MW) Project

Name of Case: Erickson v. Ontario (Director, Ministry of the Environment)

Issues: Harm to human health.

Wind turbines – unsafe exposure to low frequency noise, shadow flicker and interference with sleep.

Date of Initial Decision: November 10, 2010

Date of Decision of ERT on Appeal: July 18, 2011

Decision: ERT concluded that there are "some risks and uncertainties associated with wind turbines that merit further research."ERT could not conclude that the Kent Breeze Wind Farm would however harm human health or the environment.

Appeal dismissed.

Wind

Size of the Project: 4 Wind Turbines x 2.5 MW each = 10 MW Project

Name of Case: Middlesex-Lambton Wind Action Group Inc. v. Director, Ministry of the Environment

Issues: Harm to human health.

Health effects on surrounding community due to proximity of the wind turbines.

Date of Initial Decision: October 31, 2011

Date of Decision of ERT on Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Scope Evidence: December 16, 2011 and February 6, 2012

Decision: On Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Scope Evidence, the ERT limited the ability of a non-expert to testify on the health effects of wind turbines.The ERT cannot simply accept the evidence of a layperson that they suffer a certain medical condition and the cause for the condition.Such testimony would need to be heard from a qualified practitioner or medical expert.

The ERT also refused to grant an adjournment as the Appellant knew about the time constraints imposed by REA in relation to appeals and all experts and medical records needed to be provided within the prescribed time period.

Motion Dismissed.

The appeal was later withdrawn in March 2012, six days prior to the start of the hearing, when the MOE submitted about 170 questions about medical, real estate and other records the MOE wanted answered by 23 witnesses.Appellant withdrew the appeal due to inability to gather all the required information before the hearing date.

Wind

Size of the Project: 58 Wind Turbines = 131.04 MW Project

Name of Case: Monture v. Director, Ministry of the Environment (Monture 1)

Issues: Aboriginal Treaty Rights – REA would affect hunting and fishing rights and would harm birds, wildlife, trees and agricultural land.

Date of Initial Decision: March 16, 2012

Date of Decision of ERT on Appeal: September 28, 2012

Decision: The ERT could not expend its jurisdiction to include aboriginal claims and consultation issues.The ERT could only rule on whether a project would cause serious harm to human health or to the environment. The issues on appeal were too general to prove that this project would result in serious harm to animal life, plant life or the natural environment.A mere possibility of harm did not meet the legal test.

Appeal dismissed.

Wind

Size of the Project: 270 MW Project

Name of Case: Chatham-Kent Wind Action Inc. v. Director, Ministry of the Environment

Issues: Harm to human health caused by a proposed 270 MW wind generation farm.

Challenge to the test because of the difficulty in demonstrating harm to emotional and mental health.

Date of Initial Decision: June 15, 2012

Date of Decision of ERT on Appeal: December 5, 2012

Decision: The ERT dismissed the challenge and found that there is no evidence to find that the project will adversely affect human health.The ERT required evidence of the impact of the project and that there is a direct impact on human health.

Appeal dismissed.

Wind

Size of the Project: 148.6 MW Project

Name of Case: Monture v. Director, Ministry of the Environment (Monture 2)

Issues: Aboriginal Treaty Rights

Date of Initial Decision: June 15, 2012

Date of Decision of ERT on Appeal: December 24, 2012

Decision: The ERT dismissed the appeal but in rendering its decision did recommend changes of terms with regards to natural heritage pre-construction and post-construction monitoring, reporting and reviewing results, Community Liaison Committee, and consultation with aboriginal communities.

Appeal dismissed.

Wind

Size of the Project: 104.4 MW Project

Name of Case: Haldimand Wind Concerns v Director, Ministry of the Environment

Issues: Irreparable harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment.

The assessment conducted by REA holder was inadequate for the planned 104.4 megawatt wind generation farm.

Date of Initial Decision: July 17, 2012

Date of Decision of ERT on Appeal: January 31, 2013

Decision: The ERT found that the appellants did not show that the project would result in serious and irreversible harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment.The ERT stated that an appeal is insufficient without evidence to demonstrate the impact of the project.

However, the ERT did make the recommendation that further research should be conducted on the impact of wind farms on certain wildlife.The ERT recommended that REA be amended to require more data collection.

Appeal dismissed.

CONCLUSION

It is difficult to assess whether public interest groups such as Wind Concerns Ontario have turned their sole focus and energy to appealing the REAs for larger scale commercial wind projects. The 2012 REA appeal in Chatham-Kent Wind Action Inc. v. Director suggests that even smaller scale wind power generation projects remain the target of wind action groups in Ontario. At the same time, there have not been any noteworthy REA appeals reported by the ERT pertaining to ground-mounted solar projects.

The above overview demonstrates the difficulty associated with developing wind power generation projects in Ontario.Both the REA process as well as the appeal process can be very time consuming and expensive. The consulting and legal fees alone can reach several hundreds of thousands of dollars. To date, the ERT has refused to rule that wind projects will either cause serious harm to human health or cause serious and irreversible harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment. However, a shift is evident in ERT's decisions/recommendations.The ERT has begun to make recommendations that further information should be collected and tracked on the impact of the wind farms.As stated in the above chart, in Haldimand Wind Concerns v. Director, Ministry of the Environment the ERT has even gone so far as to recommend that the REA be amended to require further data collection, which signals that the ERT may be headed in a different direction in the future.

Prepared with the assistance of Mariana Fonar, Student-at-Law at Dale & Lessmann LLP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Sven Walker
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.