Canada: Cassels Brock Federal Budget Brief 2013

Published: 03/21/2013

The following is a summary of certain fundamental tax measures contained in the Canadian federal government's budget released on March 21, 2013.


Budget 2013 contains several proposals relevant to the mining and energy sectors, some of which will be welcome by certain taxpayers while other changes may have adverse implications to taxpayers incurring pre-production expenses and making investments in new mines and mine expansion.

Flow-Through Shares: Extension of the Mineral Exploration Tax Credit ("METC")

Flow-through shares provide a major source of new capital to junior mining companies.  These shares are attractive to investors for various reasons, including (i) the ability to deduct at the investor-level certain exploration expenses incurred by the issuing corporation; and (ii) the ability in certain circumstances to claim a special 15% METC in respect of the investment in the share. The existing METC is scheduled to expire on March 31, 2013; however, consistent with the past several federal budgets, Budget 2013 proposes to extend the 15% METC for an additional year, until March 31, 2014. Otherwise, flow-through shares are unaffected by Budget 2013.

Expansion of Accelerated Capital Cost Allowance ("CCA") for Clean Energy

Several proposals have been introduced by the Department of Finance ("Finance") over the past few years to provide a tax incentive for investment in clean energy generation equipment, including wind and solar equipment.  These incentives are in the form of rapid deductions for CCA in respect of the cost of the equipment (50% deduction on a declining balance basis).  Budget 2013 proposes to expand the existing category of eligible assets to include certain biomass production equipment and associated cleaning and upgrading equipment.

Phase-out of Accelerated CCA for Certain Mining Expenses

Budget 2013 proposes to phase-out certain preferential CCA deduction rates in respect of the cost of capital assets (i.e., machinery, equipment and structures) used in new mines and major mine expansions.

Natural resource companies, including mining and oil and gas companies, are currently entitled to claim capital cost allowance deductions in respect of most capital assets at a 25% declining-balance basis. Mining companies are entitled to an additional accelerated CCA in respect of capital assets used in new mines or certain mine expansions. Budget 2013 proposes to phase-out this accelerated CCA over the 2017-2020 taxation years, which in the view of Finance will better align the tax regimes of the mining sector with those applicable to other natural resource sectors (i.e., oil and gas).

Both this measure and the proposed phase-out of preferential deductions for pre-production expenses (discussed below) will apply to expenses incurred on or after March 21, 2013, subject to certain exceptions. Accordingly, taxpayers in the mining sector should closely review the types of expenses that will be subject to this phasing out and determine whether any such expenses may qualify for certain limited grandfathering.

Phase-out of Preferential Deductions for Pre-Production Mine Development

Budget 2013 proposes to phase-out preferential deduction rates in respect of pre-production mine development expenses (i.e., intangible expenses for removing overburden or sinking a mine shaft) that are incurred for the purpose of bringing a new mine for a mineral resource located in Canada into production.

Such expenses are currently treated as Canadian exploration expense ("CEE") and may be deducted in full in the year incurred or carried forward indefinitely for use in future years.  This is to be contrasted with similar expenses incurred after a mine comes into production, which are treated as Canadian development expense ("CDE") and are deductible at a much less favourable rate of 30% per year on a declining-balance basis.

Budget 2013 proposes to recharacterize such expenses as CDE instead of CEE (phased-in over the 2014 to 2017 taxation years), resulting in the loss of the favourable 100% deduction in the year the expenses are incurred and a migration over to the less-favourable 30% deduction regime. As with the phase-out of preferential depreciation rates for certain mining expenses (discussed above), Finance considers this measure as better aligning the tax treatment available across the natural resources sector. 


Synthetic Dispositions

A synthetic disposition is an arrangement under which a taxpayer economically disposes of a property but retains ownership of the property. The arrangement may be designed to alienate property without triggering the income tax consequences that would result from a disposition.

In a somewhat unexpected move, Budget 2013 proposes that agreements and arrangements entered into by a taxpayer that have the effect of eliminating all or substantially all of the taxpayer's risk or loss and opportunity for gain or profit in respect of the property for a period of more than one year, will give rise to a deemed disposition of the property by the taxpayer at fair market value and a deemed reacquisition of the property at that same amount. Despite the deemed reacquisition of the property, the taxpayer would not be regarded as being the owner of the property for certain holding period tests relating to stop-loss rules and foreign tax credits. The taxpayer would re-commence to be regarded as the owner of the property when all or substantially all the risk of loss/opportunity for profit ceases to lie with someone other than the taxpayer.  The proposal can extend to agreements and arrangements entered into by persons or partnerships not dealing at arm's length with the taxpayer, where it may reasonably be considered to have been entered into with the purpose of eliminating the taxpayer's risk of loss/opportunity for profit.

The proposal is quite broad and, according to Finance, could apply to certain forward sales of property, put-call collars and certain indebtedness that is exchangeable for property. There is no discussion in the Budget materials concerning the potential application of this proposal to exchangeable share arrangements, which have been widely used in the market. Also, there is no mention of the potential application of these rules to convertible debentures, which presumably should not be within the ambit of these proposed rules. The proposal is generally not intended to apply to hedging transactions, ordinary securities lending arrangements or ordinary commercial leasing transactions.

The proposal is to apply to agreements and arrangements entered into on or after March 21, 2013, as well as agreements and arrangements entered into before that date, the term of which is extended on or after that date.

Character Conversion Transactions

A character conversion transaction is designed to reduce income tax by converting what would otherwise be ordinary income into a capital gain, only half of which is included in taxable income.  The transaction involves an agreement to purchase or sell a capital property in the future at a price determined by reference to a derivative, often a portfolio of investments.  If a taxpayer invested in the derivative directly, the return would generally be included as fully-taxable income rather than a capital gain.

Budget 2013 proposes to treat the return (or loss) under such an arrangement as being on income account, distinct from the disposition of the particular capital property.  Changes would be made to the adjusted cost base rules, to avoid double taxation in respect of the particular capital property.  The measure would apply to all such agreements that have a duration of more than 180 days, entered into on or after March 21, 2013, as well as agreements entered into before that date, the term of which is extended on or after that date.

Anti-Loss Trading

Budget 2013 proposes to introduce rules prohibiting "loss trading" transactions that circumvent the existing "loss streaming" rules that are triggered on the acquisition of control of a corporation having net operating losses.

"Loss trading" transactions have been a hot topic for several years. Tax attributes such as losses and credits are not assets that can be directly bought and sold.  Moreover, the Income Tax Act (Canada) ("ITA") significantly limits the use by a corporation (or its successor as a result of a wind-up or amalgamation) of its non-capital losses (i.e., business losses) after the loss corporation experiences an acquisition of control.  For this purpose, an acquisition of control is triggered generally upon the acquisition by a person of shares carrying the right to elect the majority of the board of directors. Accordingly, transaction structures have developed to allow a profitable corporation to effectively benefit from the losses of another corporation without triggering a legal acquisition of control of the loss corporation. These structures generally involve some combination of the assets of the profitable and loss corporations and the acquisition by the profitable corporation of a non-controlling block of shares in the loss corporation; however, the profitable corporation will obtain an economic interest in the loss corporation that is often significantly greater than 50%. While such structures were initially considered by the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") to not offend the "general anti-avoidance rule" ("GAAR") in section 245 of the ITA (see, e.g., the "Hemosol" Advance Tax Rulings in 2003 and 2004), there has subsequently been significant criticism from the Canadian government, including the Auditor General.  Accordingly, there has been some measure of risk that such transactions may be attacked by the CRA under the GAAR. 

Budget 2013 will make it much more difficult to implement such transactions by proposing to deem an acquisition of control of the loss company where a person has acquired more than 75% of the fair market value of the shares of the loss corporation regardless of the voting control of such shares. Accordingly, the CRA would not need to consider, or rely upon, the application of the GAAR when assessing loss trading transactions that fall within the ambit of this proposed rule. It is interesting to note that a measure designed to combat the abuse of a bright-line test (i.e., the threshold for a legal acquisition of control) itself introduces a new bright-line test (i.e., 75% of the fair market value of the shares of the loss company).

This measure will apply to acquisitions of shares that occur after March 21, 2013, subject to limited exceptions.

Trust Loss Trading

As discussed above, the ITA contains restrictions on the trading of losses between arm's length corporations.  Budget 2013 proposes to extend these rules to trusts to combat arrangements under which a person would (i) acquire an interest in the trust with unused losses, (ii) transfer an income-producing property to the trust, and (iii) use the trust's losses to offset the income from the property.  This may be relevant to certain income trust conversion transactions. The new measure would apply where a trust is subject to a "loss restriction event", being the acquisition by a person or partnership of a beneficial interest in the trust having a fair market value greater than 50% of all the beneficial interests in the trust.  This measure, which is not anticipated to impact family trust structures, will be effective for transactions that occur on or after March 21, 2013, other than transactions that the parties are obligated to complete pursuant to a written agreement concluded before that date.

Extension of Accelerated CCA for Manufacturing Equipment

Prior Budgets introduced an accelerated CCA rule for machinery and equipment acquired between 2007 and 2014, for use primarily in Canada for the manufacturing or processing of goods for sale or lease.  Budget 2013 proposes to extend this measure to such equipment acquired in 2014 or 2015, thus extending the 50%, straight-line CCA rate for another two years.

Corporate Group Consolidation

In prior years, Finance had indicated that it was reviewing whether the introduction of a formal group consolidation regime (similar to what has been adopted in other countries such as the United States) should be introduced into the Canadian corporate tax landscape.  The general benefit of consolidation is the ability to apply the losses of one corporate group member against the profits of another, without the need to enter into complex inter-company loss or profit-shifting transactions.

Budget 2013 confirms that corporate group consolidation is not something that we should expect to see in the near future. After a lengthy consultation process with various members of the tax and business communities, it appears that group consolidation "is not a priority at this time".  This does not come as a surprise since the issue of group consolidation regularly surfaces from time to time and no consensus concerning an efficient means of implementing such system in Canada has yet emerged.


Thin Capitalization – Extended Application to Trusts and Branches

Budget 2013 proposes to extend the scope of Canada's thin capitalization rules and, as a result, non-residents that hold Canadian businesses or investments through a trust or non-resident corporation will need to review the potential thin capitalization implications to new and existing indebtedness.

Canada's thin capitalization regime generally restricts the amount of interest expense that a Canadian corporation can deduct on debt owed to a "specified non-resident shareholder" as defined in the ITA. As a result of changes made in 2012, similar rules would apply to a partnership of which a Canadian-resident corporation is a partner. Generally, if the ratio of such debt as compared to certain "equity" of the corporation exceeds a ratio of 1.5:1, the corporation will be denied an interest deduction in respect of the excess and will be deemed to have paid a dividend subject to Canadian withholding tax.

Many changes were made to the thin capitalization regime in 2012 on the basis of recommendations by the 2008 Advisory Panel on Canada's System of International Taxation. Budget 2013 seeks to further implement the recommendations of the Advisory Panel, notably to extend the application of the thin capitalization rules to Canadian-resident trusts and non-resident corporations and trusts that operate in Canada.  These have long been perceived as deficiencies in the thin capitalization rules that, in certain cases, may influence the manner through which non-residents seek to hold businesses or investments in Canada. For example, there may be a tax benefit for a corporation resident in a low-tax jurisdiction to highly leverage a non-resident trust or another non-resident corporation to acquire Canadian real estate. Rather than be subject to high Canadian withholding tax rates on its rental income, the entity holding the Canadian real estate could elect to pay Canadian tax on its income but could reduce its income significantly through large interest deductions that are not currently subject to any thin capitalization restrictions.  In contrast, if the real estate was held through a Canadian corporation, the corporation would be limited in the amount of interest-bearing debt that it could issue to its non-resident parent. 

The determination of the thin capitalization threshold and the implications of exceeding such threshold by a Canadian-resident trust, a non-resident trust or a non-resident corporation are unique and must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis. For example, a branch of a non-resident corporation will need to monitor its "debt-to-asset" ratio (which must be kept within a new 3-to-5 ratio) and must be aware of potential Canadian branch tax implications to any denied interest expense. Moreover, a Canadian-resident trust may be able to designate to treat the denied interest payment as a payment of income to a non-resident beneficiary, subject to Canadian withholding tax and potentially an additional tax under Part XII.2 of the ITA.

These proposals will apply to taxation years beginning after 2013 and there is no grandfathering of existing indebtedness. Accordingly, non-residents that may be affected by these proposals must evaluate their existing structures and determine if any reorganization or recapitalization may be required.

Budget 2013 does not propose to extend the thin capitalization rules to inter-company guarantees, which has previously been raised as a potential issue.

Non-Resident Trusts – Deemed Residency

Canada has complex tax rules (and proposed rules) that operate to deem a non-resident trust to be a resident of Canada in certain circumstances, including where a resident of Canada has made a "contribution" to the trust. Other rules will attribute income from a trust to a person if the trust's property may revert to that person or the person effectively controls the trust's dealings with the property. Recent case law (Sommerer v. the Queen, 2012 FCA 207) confirms that this latter attribution rule will not apply if a Canadian resident beneficiary sells property to a non-resident trust for fair market value consideration, even if the property may ultimately revert to that person.

Finance considers the result in Sommerer to be contrary to the "intended tax policy" of the ITA.  Budget 2013 therefore contains a provision that will amend the rules in section 94 of the ITA and deem a trust to be resident in Canada (and therefore taxable in Canada) generally where a Canadian resident sells property at fair market value to the trust and retains some measure of "effective ownership" over the property.

This proposal will apply to taxation years ending on or after March 21, 2013 and may have far-reaching effects that should be considered by any Canadian resident that has, or is contemplating, a sale of property to a non-resident trust.

Treaty Shopping

"Treaty shopping" is a term commonly used by tax authorities to describe international investment that is structured by a resident of Country A into Country B indirectly through an entity in Country C and that results in the availability of benefits under a tax treaty between Countries B and C that would not have been available between Countries A and B. The CRA has made several varied attempts to judicially challenge perceived "treaty shopping" (see, e.g., MIL (Investments) SA, 2006 TCC 460; aff'd. 2007 FCA 236; Prévost Car, Inc. 2008 TCC 231, aff'd 2009 FCA 57; Velcro Canada, 2012 TCC 57); however, the courts have not been receptive to the CRA's arguments, leaving the CRA in a position where it may have little judicial, statutory or treaty-based means of challenging such situations.

Budget 2013 does not introduce any formal measure designed to curtail "treaty shopping"; however, the Budget materials provide that Finance intends to release a consultation paper concerning potential measures.  This will be an interesting consultation process, as the topics of "treaty shopping", treaty abuse, beneficial ownership, limitation on benefits, etc., have produced varied international responses and opinion.


Rewarding Whistleblowers

In a surprising move, Budget 2013 will introduce a program to permit the compensation of persons who "tip" the authorities to international tax non-compliance resulting in assessments exceeding $100,000 in federal tax. The program will provide for "rewards" of up to 15% of the tax collected. To be eligible to collect the reward, the person providing the information will have to satisfy "program criteria" which are not clearly defined. The CRA will announce further details on the program.

Extended Reassessment Periods – Tax Shelters and Reportable Transactions

The tax rules require certain filings in respect of tax shelters and certain reportable transactions.  The tax benefits flowing from participation in those transactions are generally not recognized until the filings are made.  However, the normal reassessment period is not extended when a filing is made late or not at all.  Commencing with taxation years that end after March 21, 2013, Budget 2013 proposes to extend the normal reassessment period to three years after the date the required information return is filed.

Accelerated Tax Collection – Charitable Donation Tax Shelters

Where a taxpayer objects to or appeals from an assessment that disallows a charitable donation deduction or credit, the CRA is generally prohibited from taking collection action until after the dispute is resolved.  In an effort to discourage participation in charitable donation tax shelter schemes, commencing with assessments for 2013 the Budget would permit the CRA to take action to collect 50% of the disputed tax, interest and penalties.

SR&ED Program Compliance

Budget 2013 proposes to require greater information about an SR&ED claimant's third-party SR&ED tax preparers, including the third-party's CRA business number and details regarding the billing arrangements, including the amount of the fees and whether contingency fees were involved.  In addition, Budget 2013 proposes a new penalty of $1,000 for each incomplete or inaccurate SR&ED claim. 

Reporting of Electronic Funds Transfers

Budget 2013 proposes to introduce a measure to require financial intermediaries such as banks to report clients' international electronic fund transfers of $10,000 or more.

Demands for Information and Foreign Reporting

Budget 2013 proposes to streamline the process relating to third-party demands for information, as well as revisions to the foreign property reporting required of taxpayers.  Further, the normal reassessment period would be extended for taxpayers who fail to report income from a specified foreign property and fail to file the required form.


Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption Increased and Indexed

Currently the ITA exempts from tax capital gains of up to $750,000 on the disposition of "qualified small business corporation shares" and "qualified farm property".  Effective as of 2014, Budget 2013 proposes that the exemption be increased by $50,000 to $800,000 and be indexed to the rate of inflation commencing in 2015.

Dividend Tax Credit Changes

Income earned through a corporation and then distributed to shareholders as a dividend is taxed at both the corporate and personal levels.  The dividend gross-up and tax credit mechanisms are intended to equate the amount of corporate and personal tax paid on dividends with the amount of tax an individual would have paid if the individual earned the income directly.  There are two gross-up and tax credit factors, depending on whether the corporation paid tax at the general rate (eligible dividends) or the preferred rate applicable to certain active business income (non-eligible dividends).  Budget 2013 proposes to adjust the gross-up and tax credit mechanisms for non-eligible dividends, on the basis that the current mechanism overcompensates individual shareholders.  The adjustments will have the effect of increasing the rate of federal tax on such dividends from 19.58% to 21.22%.


Restricted Farm Losses

For taxpayers that do not have farming as their chief source of income are limited by the restricted farm loss ("RFL") rules to claiming an annual maximum deduction for farm losses of $8,750.  Budget 2013 proposes to overturn the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in The Queen v. Craig, 2012 SCC 43, by codifying that the "chief source of income" test requires that all of a taxpayer's other sources of income must be subordinate to farming. For example, a taxpayer whose chief source of income is professional services but that also carries on a secondary farming business would be subject to the RFL rules in respect of losses from the farming business.

Charitable Donation Tax Credit

Budget 2013 proposes to introduce an enhanced charitable donation tax credit for donors who have not claimed the credit since 2008.  The "First-Time Donor's Super Credit" will provide a tax federal credit of 40% for cash donations up to $200 and a 54% federal credit for donations in excess of $200 but not exceeding $1,000.

Labour-Sponsored Venture Capital Corporation ("LSVCC") Tax Credit Phase Out

The LSVCC tax credit presently provides a 15% tax credit to individuals who invest in up to $5,000 worth of shares of a LSVCC, providing tax relief of up to $750.  In light of other sources of venture-capital funding, Budget 2013 proposes to phase out the credit.  The credit will be reduced to 10% for 2015, 5% for 2016 and eliminated as of 2017.

Graduated Rates for Testamentary Trusts – Consultation

Budget 2013 announces the intention to initiate consultations on the elimination of graduated tax rates for testamentary trusts and certain inter vivos trusts.  The government is concerned with fairness in relation to the treatment of inter vivos trusts, which pay tax at the highest marginal rate, as well as with an increased use of multiple testamentary trusts.

Withholding of GST/HST Refunds

Budget 2013 would permit the withholding of  GST/HST refund payments where the claimant has failed to provide information required as part of the GST/HST registration process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Minden Gross LLP
Collins Barrow National Incorporated
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Minden Gross LLP
Collins Barrow National Incorporated
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions