The disclosure document is the centrepiece of franchise law in
Canada. In those provinces which have franchise legislation,
franchisors are required to provide prospective franchisees with a
sufficient amount of background on the system via the disclosure
document so that those prospects can make informed investment
decisions about whether they want to become a franchisee or
One of the tenets of franchise law is that, while containing all
the requisite pieces of information which the legislation requires,
disclosure documents must also be "clear and
concise". Conciseness is generally anathema to lawyers,
and those who practice in franchising are no exception. As a
result, it is not uncommon to come across disclosure documents that
are anywhere from 100 - 400 pages long, depending on the number of
attachments to the main document.
It is a tough balancing act which those of us who draft
disclosure documents day in and day out must abide by. On the
one hand, we want to be sure that our franchisor clients are
leaving no stone unturned in their disclosure so that every
question which a franchisee may have can be answered within the
pages of that document. After all, franchise legislation sets
out a laundry list of categories of information which have to be
disclosed, with the basket provision that all "material
facts" must also be included. We want to make sure
we're not missing anything.
On the other hand, an information package which pages number in
the hundreds is unlikely to meet that threshold of clarity and
conciseness that goes to the raison d'etre of a disclosure
document - so that the franchisee can understand it! Many
times, franchisees will deliver a disclosure document to their
lawyers without ever having actually read it, so daunted they are
by its volume and breadth.
There is no doubt that, in order to protect our franchisor
clients, franchise lawyers must draft lengthy disclosure documents
to ensure that all of the potentially relevant information which a
franchisee should or needs to know be included. In that
respect, one should not expect a disclosure document to be
"concise" as that term may be generally understood.
Perhaps a disclosure document's conciseness should be measured
against other disclosure documents as a reference point for when
one has gone on far longer than need be.
However, it is incumbent upon us as franchise lawyers to ensure
that we control the "clarity" element of the information
which gets presented to franchisees. Just because a document
is long doesn't mean it can't be written in plain
English. If we want to ensure complaint franchise disclosure
documents which accomplish their legislative purpose, perhaps it is
time that we draft them in more accessible language rather than as
correspondence between legal advisors.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A fundamental principle of contract law in Canada is that the parties to a contract are usually free to negotiate and agree upon any terms which will advance their respective (and sometimes mutual) interests.
Royal Bank of Canada v. Surje & Company Inc. is a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The personal defendant, Sunny Bhasin held most of the common shares in Surge & Company Inc., the corporate defendant.
The use of electronic signatures is becoming increasingly commonplace in commercial transactions, as individuals and businesses capitalize on the administrative efficiency afforded by today’s digital world.
Following the Divisional Court's decision in Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Ryerson University, companies that contract with government institutions should be aware that such contracts are likely open to disclosure under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
Back in April 2015, we discussed key questions to keep in mind when negotiating earn-outs, and looked at recent trends coming out of the American Bar Association's 2014 Canadian Private Target M&A Deal Points Study (the 2014 ABA Study).
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).