Canada: Shaver v. The Co-operators: Court Of Appeal Stays The Course On SEF No. 44 Limitation

Last Updated: February 25 2013
Article by Geoffrey Duckworth

I. Introduction

The Alberta Court of Appeal has maintained a cautious and sensible approach to the interpretation of the "discoverability" limitation in paragraph 6(c) of Family Protection Endorsement SEF No. 44. In Shaver v. The Co-operators,1 Justice Cote opined in obiter that discoverability may occur when the injured plaintiff or her lawyer make a decision about the worth of the claims of the plaintiff, and, if applicable, of those of other persons injured in the accident, or that discoverability may occur later, once a judgment or binding settlement legally fixes the amounts of the claims.2  Under SEF No. 44, the 12-month limitation begins to run from the date in which:

the eligible claimant or his legal representatives knew or ought to have known that the quantum of the claims with respect to an insured person exceeded the minimum limits for motor vehicle liability insurance in the jurisdiction in which the accident occurred.3 

For reasons identified in the decision, and briefly commented on below, it is clear that discoverability will occur most frequently once a judgment or a binding settlement legally fixes the amount of the claims.

The Court of Appeal also pronounced that paragraph 6(c) of the endorsement will "quite often" let an injured plaintiff sue later than the ultimate 10-year deadline under s. 3(1)(b) of the Limitations Act.

II. SEF No. 44 Endorsement

Under SEF No. 44, a plaintiff can sue her own insurer in respect of an "inadequately insured motorist". The amount payable under the endorsement is excess to amounts a claimant would be entitled to recover from certain other sources, including an unsatisfied judgment fund. Pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Regulation, the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (the claims fund) can pay up to a maximum of $200,000, excluding costs, regarding all claims arising out of a single motor vehicle accident.

III. Action History

In Shaver, the plaintiff Lloyd Shaver was injured on July 14, 2000 in a three-car collision with one other identified driver, Alison Jevne. Jevne and Shaver commenced separate personal injury actions, including against the claims fund. In August 2008 – prior to Shaver's trial on damages – Jevne advised that the claims fund had settled her claim for $100,000, leaving only $100,000 available for Shaver under the prescribed $200,000 limit. In January 2010, the fund advised it was prepared to enter into a partial judgment in favour of Shaver, in the amount of $100,000, plus costs and disbursements. The partial judgment was taken out on January 19, 2010. 

Shaver's injury was a broken foot which evolved into a pain syndrome in the foot, making it difficult for him to walk. His principal claim was loss of income available from an oilfield occupation he was no longer performing. Given his advancing injuries, Shaver commenced action against his insurer on July 29, 2010, claiming coverage under SEF No. 44. The insurer applied for summary judgment on the basis that the action was commenced beyond the 10-year "ultimate" limitation under section 3(1)(b) of the Limitations Act.

At trial, the parties agreed that discovery occurred well over nine years after the accident, when the partial judgment in favour of Shaver was consented to by the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund and taken out. Shaver's subsequent action against the insurer was not commenced until over ten years after the accident. 

IV. Findings

The insurer's summary judgment application was unsuccessful at both levels of court. At the Court of Appeal level, Justice Cote underscored the challenges incumbent in discoverability under the endorsement. The inquiry may be factually-intensive, contingent upon many factors, including medical conditions, which may evolve and progress over time. Discovery may require information, including about other parties, that the other parties may not be obligated to disclose. On these issues, the Court of Appeal opined as follows:

[para. 12]  ...[discoverability in this case] involves actions by and information from other entities, and indeed from other injured people...

[para. 14]  If a plaintiff's own injuries are more than slight, it may take many months until his or her medical advisers can even tentatively assess the future, and before his or her counsel can suggest what those injury claims are worth.  It is very common that the treating physician or surgeon initially hopes for a more or less full recovery; only the elapse of significant time shows that that is too optimistic in the case at hand...

[para. 15] After seeking that clarity for one victim's injury claim, the same process must be followed with respect to all other claimants injured in the same accident. That may not be easy or quick. An injured person (or his or her solicitor) can ask his or her own medical advisers for such information. But he or she has no right to demand such information from other persons injured in the accident; and statutory or other confidentiality obligations may well prevent their advisers or agents from revealing that. If the two injured people owed each other no duty of care, or the other victim was plainly not negligent, or plainly did not cause injuries, that other victim cannot be sued. So no discovery is available to compel such information.

[para. 16] Therefore it may well take a long time until one injured person can find whether the total claims from the accident exceed the compulsory minimum limits (or exceed any other relevant ceiling or sum). If a number of vehicles and passengers are involved, it could be a long time indeed...

[para. 43]  It may well take over nine years to learn of inadequate insurance, or of the total claims exceeding minimum insurance limits, or both. It took that long here.4

V. Discoverability under SEF No. 44

The reasoning employed in the decision was consistent with prior Alberta Court of Appeal decisions in Birtles v. Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co.5 and Shoemaker v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co.6 The prior decisions stand for the proposition that the limitation under SEF No. 44 will run from final judgment or settlement or "or some other final determination". 

The Court of Appeal recognized the difficulties that could be encountered in reaching an opinion about the "quantum of the claims" in the absence of a settlement or a final judgment. This approach is cautious and sensible, while still preserving the potential that a court could find for an earlier start date in the appropriate factual setting.7 Such cases will likely be relatively sparse. It is one thing for a limitation to require knowledge of an injury attributable to a defendant which warrants bringing a proceeding. It is quite another to require accurate calculation above the minimum limits without the benefit of a settlement or a final judgment.  

From an insurer's perspective, the consistent approach of the Alberta courts to discoverability under the endorsement has a further advantage: it reduces the possibility of a flood of SEF No. 44 claims, filed out of caution given the uncertainty over the start of the limitation period.

VI. The Application of the Limitations Act

The application of the Limitations Act8 in respect of SEF No. 44 remains uncertain. At the Queen's Bench level, Justice Veit held that the 10-year limitation did not commence at the time of the accident, but rather, when the insured knew, or ought to have known, that the tortfeasor's coverage would be inadequate to cover the insured's damages.9 At the Court of Appeal, Justice Cote expressly declined to make the same finding. Rather, he held that:

...the endorsement quite often will purport to let the injured person sue later than the ultimate "ten-year" statutory s. 3(1)(b) of the Limitations Act will.  Therefore s. 7(1) of the Limitations Act expressly allows that.10  And its s. 7(2) does not forbid it.  Or its s. 7(2) does not forbid it in these circumstances...

All that renders academic whether the ultimate 10-year back-up section can be said to start later than is commonly supposed.11

At trial, the insurer had argued that the 10-year limitation under s. 3(1)(b) of the Limitations Act had commenced at the time of the accident, and further, that discoverability was not part of the 10-year limitation under the Act. That argument may have missed the point. The drafting of the endorsement imports discoverability into the insurance contract, such that the limitation only begins to run once there is discovery that the minimum limits have been exceeded. Indeed, the Court of Appeal seems to have acknowledged this briefly in Shaver: "Maybe ordinary limitation periods do not require evaluating the claim; but this one expressly does."12

The Court of Appeal's pronouncement that the endorsement will "quite often" extend the 10-year statutory limitation may have to be revisited in a case where the 12-month endorsement limitation is found to have expired over ten years after the accident date. In such a case, the insured will point to the two-year limitation under s. 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act in order to preserve his claim.  The insurer will counter that, despite the Court of Appeal's closing comments in Shaver, the decision was based on a determination that discoverability under the endorsement occurred within less than 12 months before the commencement of the claim.  In a case where the 12-month endorsement limitation has expired, the insurer will argue that the statutory 10-year limitation applies as the period which "expires first" under the Act, since discoverability is not part of 10-year rule.  The issue will no longer be academic at that point.

For a more comprehensive analysis of Shaver and other Alberta Court of Appeal decisions on the SEF No. 44 limitation, and an opinion on the potential impact of the new Insurance Act, please see my upcoming article in the spring 2013 special insurance edition of the Alberta Law Review.


Limitations Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. L-12 (current)

Limitation periods

3(1) Subject to section 11, if a claimant does not seek a remedial order within

(a) 2 years after the date on which the claimant first knew, or in the circumstances ought to have known,

(i) that the injury for which the claimant seeks a remedial order had occurred,

(ii) that the injury was attributable to conduct of the defendant, and

(iii) that the injury, assuming liability on the part of the defendant, warrants bringing a proceeding,


(b) 10 years after the claim arose,

whichever period expires first, the defendant, on pleading this Act as a defence, is entitled to immunity from liability in respect of the claim.

R.S.A. 2000 c. L-12 s. 3;2007 c. 22 s. 1


7(1) Subject to section 9, if an agreement expressly provides for the extension of a limitation period provided by this Act, the limitation period is altered in accordance with the agreement.

(2) An agreement that purports to provide for the reduction of a limitation period provided by this Act is not valid.

R.S.A. 2000 c. L-12 s. 7; 2002 c. 17 s. 4


1 2011 ABCA 367 [Shaver]. 

2 Ibid. at para. 18.

3 Family Protection Endorsement SEF No. 44, paragraph 6(c). The full paragraph reads: "Every action or proceeding against the Insurer for recovery under this endorsement shall be commenced within 12 months from the date upon which the eligible claimant or his legal representatives knew or ought to have known that the quantum of the claims with respect to an insured person exceeded the minimum limits for motor vehicle liability insurance in the jurisdiction in which the accident occurred.  No action which is commenced within 2 years of the date of the accident shall be barred by this provision."

4 Shaver, supra note 1 at paras. 12, 14-16 and 43.

5 1986 CarswellAlta 153 (C.A.) [Birtles].

6 1993 CanLII 7048 (Alta. Q.B.); upheld in 1994 CarswellAlta 19 (C.A.) [Shoemaker].

7 This cautious approach appears consistent with the Ontario Court of Appeal's past approach in respect of a substantively identical endorsement limitation.  In Caruso v. Guarantee Co. of North America, 1996 CarswellOnt 4384 (C.A.), Justice Finlayson opined at paragraph 24: "I have some difficulty in understanding the significance of the alternate limitation periods in s. 17 of the O.E.F. 44.  Like the courts in [omitted], I find the language ambiguous.  In these circumstances, I think it ill advised to embark upon an analysis of whether the significant event is the [solicitor's] determination of the quantum of damages.  I will content myself with accepting the finding of the motions judge that it is difficult to conclude in this case that the appellant's solicitor knew that her injuries would exceed the minimum limit more than twelve months before the action against the respondent was commenced."

8 Please refer to the attached Appendix to refer to sections 3 and 7 of the Limitation Act.  Section 3 sets out the two and ten-year limitation periods; section 7 deals with extensions and the prohibition on reductions of limitation periods.

9 Shaver v. Co-operators General Insurance Company, 2011 CarswellAlta 478 (Q.B.) [Shaver Q.B.].

10 Section 7(1) of the Act expressly allows for limitations under the Act to be extended by agreement. 

11 Shaver, supra note 1 at paras. 43-44.

12 Ibid. at para. 10.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions