Canada: M&A: What To Expect In 2013

In each of these decisions, the actions taken by the target boards were seen by regulators as constituting (or potentially constituting) inappropriate interference by those target boards in the takeover process. The actions taken by the regulators in both cases appear to reflect the prevailing view of many Canadian securities regulators that the role of directors, while important, should be strictly limited both in terms of time and available tactics, and that ultimately decisions regarding whether or not to accept a hostile bid should be left to shareholders, not directors.

In 2013, new rules on the use of shareholder rights plans may be coming which give target boards more power

The Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) has announced that in early 2013 it intends to publish a new proposal for dealing with shareholder rights plans which it believes will continue to adhere to the general concept that ultimate power to accept or reject hostile bids should rest with shareholders. It is expected that the OSC will propose granting more latitude to target boards to adopt and use shareholder rights plans to defend against hostile bids, particularly where those plans are approved by target shareholders. It is not yet clear how much support these new proposals will get from other Canadian securities regulators, some of whom appear to believe the current system works quite well. However, if the effort is ultimately successful and is implemented broadly across Canada, this would be a significant development for M&A practice in Canada and would likely make the process of completing a hostile bid in Canada more expensive and subject to significantly more uncertainty from the point of view of a hostile bidder.

To read more about these topics, please click here.

TRENDS IN KEY DEAL TERMS

Jeff Barnes

Adjusting Consideration and Risk in Purchase and Support Agreements

General trends in the drafting of agreements relating to the acquisition of shares of public entities will reflect the caution shown in 2012. Buyers will be attempting to limit transaction risk and both parties will try to bridge the gap between buyer and seller in determining future value. Adjustment provisions in both directions can be very flexible in a private M&A context, and can include

  • Escrow provisions, holding back consideration to cover representations generally and to cover specific representations which go to the core value
  • Use of earn-outs in various forms, including cash top-ups and retaining an ongoing interest in convertible instruments or preferred shares in public situations

However in public M & A for shares, these adjustment mechanisms are rare. The difficulties in providing for post-closing flexibility in public M&A transactions may feed a preference for the acquisition of desirable assets from public companies, rather than bids for shares. Alternatively, instruments could be distributed which provide potential additional consideration on an earn-out basis or represent an interest in any net holdback. There has been limited past use of similar value-tracking instruments where the value of an asset (e.g. litigation) has been highly conditional.

Closing Conditions in Support Agreements in Public M&A

Some interesting recent studies have posited that the failure of markets to consistently reflect the different conditionality of different acquisition agreements should result in a different approach to merger agreements [Manns, Jeffrey David and Anderson, Robert, The Merger Agreement Myth (July 15, 2012), Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming; 7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN]. That paper suggested that failure to meet most conditions should result in price adjustments (or "contingent consideration") rather than deal failure (or "contingent closing").

Closing Periods and Reverse Break Fees

A more trying climate in terms of meeting closing conditions (especially government approvals) may be reflected in longer closing terms coupled with higher reverse break fees.

Confidentiality Agreements and Standstills

There has been significant turbulence in U.S. courts in interpreting standstill terms, which leaves an apparent gap between the views of Canadian and U.S. courts on assessing directors' decisions to agree to tie their hands. Expect further experimentation. For a review of recent relevant cases, click here for our bulletin on this topic.

Advisory Agreements

A more turbulent financial market continues to be reflected in comings and goings (but mainly goings) in advisory areas. Changes in service businesses may be reflected in engagement terms. For example, "tails" for financial advisers may be made conditional on preservation of the individual members of the targeted working team within the advisor.

USING SPIN-OUTS TO BRIDGE VALUATION GAPS

Paul A. D. Mingay and Steve Suarez

While companies are reportedly sitting on piles of cash (so much so, that it has become somewhat of a political issue with Canadian cabinet ministers and the Governor of the Bank of Canada urging companies to spend this "dead money"), one might expect such companies to be free spenders when it comes to acquisitions. However, persistent economic uncertainty has made potential purchasers reluctant to spend accumulated cash on acquisitions and we expect this trend to continue until an economic recovery is firmly established.

In the M&A area, this reluctance to overspend is often coupled with the fact that a target company may have, in addition to its desirable assets, other assets that are less attractive, at least from the prospective acquirer's perspective. This is particularly true in the resource sector where smaller exploration companies will often have a number of properties at different stages of development. If one or two properties prove to be promising and attract the attention of a major resource company, there may be a wide gulf between the value that the target company puts on its other properties and the value that the acquirer is willing to pay for them. Indeed, in many cases the acquirer may view them as superfluous and have no interest in continuing their exploration or development.

Of course, the easiest answer might be for the target to simply sell the valuable asset and keep the other assets and continue their development. This is not always advantageous to the shareholders, however, as such a sale often triggers a taxable event for the target and there may be no tax-effective way to flow the sale proceeds into the hands of shareholders. Similarly, the use of earn-outs (or, in a public company context, contingent value rights), the tool often used to bridge valuation gaps, is not well-suited to long-term projects like mining or oil and gas projects. A spin-out transaction may be a possible alternative solution.

Under a spin-out coupled with an M&A transaction, the acquirer purchases the shares of the target company, but the assets which the acquirer doesn't want are contemporaneously spun-out of the target into a new company, the shares of which are distributed to the target shareholders as part of the transaction. Thus, the target shareholders get paid full value for the target's core assets but also are able to continue to participate in the development of the other assets. Similarly, the acquiror only has to pay for what it actually wants. Such spin-out transactions can often be completed in a reasonably tax-effective manner, depending on the facts.

For these reasons, we anticipate spin-outs will continue to be a feature of M&A in 2013 as a tool for bridging value gaps in acquisition transactions. Beyond their use in M&A, we can also expect that spin-outs will continue to appear as a way of enhancing value within diversified enterprises: see for example the pending Loblaw Companies Limited spin-out of its real estate into a new REIT and the coming proxy battle to push Agrium Inc. to spin out its farm store business.

To read more about these topics, please click here.

NEW TAX ISSUES FOR FOREIGN BUYERS

Steve Suarez

One of the most important considerations for M&A purchasers (especially in cross-border transactions) is managing the tax issues. Foreign purchasers of Canadian entities will need to plan around significant changes to the Income Tax Act (Canada) enacted in 2012.

First of all, revisions were made to Canada's "thin capitalization" rules in 2012. These rules limit the extent to which a Canadian-resident corporation ("Canco") can deduct interest expense incurred on debt owing to "specified non-residents": non-residents of Canada who either are 25%+ shareholders of Canco or who deal non-arm's length with such 25%+ shareholders. Effective January 1, 2013, Canco can only deduct interest expense on an amount of debt owing to specified non-residents equal to 150% of Canco's "equity" (start-of-year unconsolidated retained earnings plus the paid-up capital ("PUC") of Canco shares owned by a non-resident 25%+ Canco shareholder). Previously, the limit had been 200% of such equity. In addition, disallowed interest is now treated as a dividend and subject to dividend withholding tax. See here for more on changes to these rules.

Since most foreign purchasers of a Canadian target use a Canco to make the purchase (for tax and non-tax reasons), a foreign purchaser can now only loan a reduced amount to its Canadian acquisition vehicle to make the purchase, and reduced interest expense deductions must be factored into the purchase price, Going forward, we expect to see Cancos financed to a greater extent with equity or with loans from arm's-length lenders (no thin capitalization limits apply to debt owing to Canadian or arm's-length lenders).

Separately, Canada introduced complex new rules ("foreign affiliate dumping" rules) in 2012 that can apply whenever a foreign purchaser acquires shares of a Canco that itself owns an equity interest in one or more foreign corporations. These rules may apply to either the initial M&A transaction or post-acquisition to any ongoing investment the Canco makes in foreign corporations. Where applicable, they effectively deem Canco to have paid a dividend or effected a capital distribution to its foreign parent. Accelerated or double taxation can arise in various circumstances, and we anticipate foreign purchasers working through these rules carefully whenever the Canadian target has interests in foreign entities. See here for a detailed analysis of these important new rules.

UNEXPECTED EMPLOYEE TERMINATION COSTS

Matthew L.O. Certosimo and Kate Dearden

Hiring new employees and ending employment relationships are often part of the activity in M&A deals (whether deals are on the rise or the decline). A well-drafted termination clause can provide clarity on the cost of job losses, whenever they occur. A recent change to the law makes employment contracts worth revisiting.

In Bowes v. Goss Power Products, 2012 ONCA 425 ("Bowes"), the Ontario Court of Appeal considered a case where the employer ended the relationship after three years, and offered salary continuance in accordance with the six-month notice period in the contract. The employee found a new job within two weeks of termination. Relying on the common law principle that a dismissed employee must mitigate his or her damages, the employer argued that the employee's salary continuance should end upon his finding new employment (provided, of course, that he had received his minimum statutory entitlement to three weeks' termination pay).

The Court disagreed; by entering into a fixed notice period, the parties had "opted out" of the common law approach that would normally require an employee to mitigate his or her damages. The Court noted that the employer could have specifically included a mitigation provision in the employment contract, but did not do so.

The significant points for employers include:

  • Employment contracts remain important. We continue to recommend employment contracts to employers. They provide a certain level of clarity with respect to rights and obligations that govern the employment relationship, including what occurs when the relationship is terminated (whether for just cause, resignation or otherwise). Contracts can include a variety of terms, such as a fixed-term, probationary period, compensation and benefits, and confidentiality clauses.
  • Termination clauses remain important. An employment contract could include a termination clause that permits an employer to end salary continuance where a dismissed employee finds new employment, provided the minimums for statutory notice of termination, or pay in lieu thereof, and statutory severance pay (where applicable) had been satisfied.
  • Review employment contracts. The Court's decision in Bowes is a reminder that employment contracts should be periodically reviewed and revised to reflect changes in employment law. Employment contracts with notice periods beyond the statutory minimum, whether a fixed amount or a formula, should be revisited.

To read more about this topic, please click here.

INVESTMENT CANADA AND SOEs

Colin P. MacDonald and Jeffrey S. Thomas

The last six months of 2012 saw the most significant political debate in Canada on foreign investment in a generation. The CNOOC/Nexen and the Petronas/Progress transactions in the Canadian oil patch caused the Government of Canada to review its guidelines on how it will evaluate proposed acquisitions of Canadian businesses by foreign investors and, in particular, "state owned entities" ("SOEs"). The revised guidelines and the Government's announced policy as it relates to SOE investment in Canada continues to allow the Government a lot of flexibility in its decision-making process as it relates to such investors. What is clear for SOEs is that investments in Alberta's oil sands will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances, that the review threshold for SOEs will remain at $330 million indexed annually, and that other investments will be reviewed more carefully both on a company and industry basis, including a determination of the potential for a foreign state to exercise control or influence on the SOE making the proposed Canadian investment. However, minority investments and investments in joint ventures by SOEs are being encouraged and remain non-reviewable in most circumstances.

Foreign investors other than SOEs can look forward to the threshold for review being raised initially to $600 million and eventually to $1 billion (enterprise value) at some point in 2013 – although this higher threshold has been promised by the government for several years. Both SOEs and all other foreign investors seeking to make an investment that is subject to review will continue to have to pass the nebulous "net benefit" test in order to obtain approval.

For more information, please click here.

THE IMPACT OF PENSION DEFICITS ON M&A

Andrew Harrison and Linda Tu (Articling Student)

Deficits in defined benefit pension plans will continue to be an issue in 2013. Persistently low interest rates and volatile capital markets, along with changing accounting standards, result in ongoing difficulty for sponsors of these plans. That, in turn, affects both potential purchasers and financiers. Purchasers and lenders need to review carefully the financial position of the target company's pension plans and the target's current and future legal obligations under those plans, and determine the impact of those obligations on the value of the enterprise.

Canadian companies which offer a pension plan to their employees are regulated under pension benefits standards legislation. This legislation imposes strict funding requirements on a pension plan and provides a limited time over which employers can fund plan deficits. Combined with a tough economic climate, these rules have led to many underfunded defined benefit pension plans in Canada. Even the small fraction of pension plans that are fully funded are under pressure, and there is no guarantee that they will remain fully funded. Potential purchasers want to avoid or contain this liability since it can lead to onerous financial obligations.

There are ways to structure an M&A transaction through a share or asset purchase that can specifically address, and potentially avoid, pension plan liabilities. See here for more details on these types of arrangements and on this topic.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions