Canada: Indalex: Supreme Court Of Canada (''SCC'') Upholds DIP Financing Priority

The SCC's decision in Indalex eliminates many of the concerns that arose from the Court of Appeal's ruling in this case. In a nutshell:

  • the super-priority of debtor-in-possession financing is upheld as overriding provincial deemed trusts;
  • the statutory deemed trust under Ontario's Pension Benefits Act (the "PBA") was upheld to apply to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up but not to the deficiency in a pension plan which is not in the process of being wound up. This should give some comfort to secured lenders, although the amount of the potentially higher ranking claim may exceed what they expected in the past;
  • what constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty to pension plan beneficiaries in insolvency cases has been limited to not arranging for independent representation and notice for plan beneficiaries. Ideally, corporations can avoid the issue entirely by having an independent pension plan committee; and
  • the use of a "constructive trust" remedy in this case was overturned.

As many readers of this Flash will already know, in the Indalex decision the Ontario Court of Appeal held that where a debtor has breached its fiduciary duties to pension plan beneficiaries, the Court may find that a "constructive trust" applies to the debtor's property (such as the proceeds resulting from the sale of its business) and, therefore, such property (or sale proceeds) must be used to fund the full amount of any pension plan deficiencies first ahead of anyone else – whether or not a statutory deemed trust applies to such pension obligations. The Court of Appeal also held that the statutory deemed trust under the PBA applies to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up.

The seven member panel of the Supreme Court of Canada released their reasons today holding (5 panel members to 2) that a "constructive trust" was not an appropriate remedy in this case. While Indalex had breached a fiduciary duty in failing to take steps to ensure that the pension plan beneficiaries had the opportunity to be fully represented (in particular, on the motion to approve the debtor-in-possession financing), such a breach in the circumstances of this case did not warrant overriding the super-priority granted to such debtor-in-possession financing by use of the constructive trust remedy.

That said, the SCC did uphold (4 panel members to 3) the Ontario Court of Appeal's opinion that the statutory deemed trust under the PBA applies to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up but concluded (in a different 4 to 3 mix) that, as a result of the application of the doctrine of federal paramountcy, the debtor-in-possession financing granted by the trial level court overseeing Indalex's proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (the "CCAA") had priority over this deemed trust. The SCC majority's basis for this conclusion was largely that the CCAA judge had considered factors that were relevant to the remedial objective of the CCAA and found that Indalex had in fact demonstrated that the CCAA's purpose in general would have been frustrated without the debtor-in-possession priority charge even though the CCAA judge did not specifically find that the recognition of the pension deemed trust specifically would frustrate the purpose of the CCAA proceeding.

It should be kept in mind that this case was decided in the context of the CCAA as it existed prior to the 2009 wholesale amendments that were made to such legislation. As such, relying on a paramountcy argument for priority in this case may not fully close the gate. The 2009 amendments now make debtor-in-possession financing an explicit statutory provision of the CCAA and specifically state that a court may order that such a charge rank in priority to any "secured creditor". Given how "secured creditor" is defined in the CCAA, there remains room to argue that the definition does not catch deemed trusts under the PBA thereby providing an avenue of attack to the paramountcy argument advanced in Indalex (as, arguably, there is now no inconsistency between federal and provincial law on this particular point). So, while the battle was certainly won in this case, the war might not be over just yet.

It is also worthy to note that, in its fiduciary duty analysis, the majority of the SCC rejected what has come to be known as the "two hats" characterization – i.e., a director only owes a fiduciary duty to pension plan members when acting as the plan administrator as opposed to when acting as a director of the corporation. Rather, the SCC held that the correct approach is to determine whether or not there is a conflict of interest between one's duties as a plan administrator versus as a corporate director. A conflict of interest arises when there is a "substantial risk" that the plan administrator duties would be "materially and adversely affected by" the director's duties to the corporation – and not, as the Court of Appeal had held, whenever a company makes decisions that have a potential to affect the plan beneficiaries. If there is a conflict of interest, a solution must be found to ensure that the plan members' interests are taken care of which may be putting the members on notice, finding a replacement administrator, appointing representative counsel or finding some other means to resolve the conflict. In this regard, commencing CCAA proceedings was not, on its own, seen as giving rise to such a conflict of interest. Furthermore, not providing notice to the plan beneficiaries on the initial CCAA application in this case was also held as not giving rise to a conflict of interest. However, the SCC did explicitly state that a debtor that finds itself in such a conflict of interest must bring the conflict to the attention of the judge overseeing the CCAA proceedings. It will then be up to the CCAA judge to decide how best to ensure that the interests of the plan beneficiaries are fully represented in the context of the CCAA proceedings – by appointing representative counsel, appointing an independent administrator, providing direct notice mechanics or otherwise.

The SCC also did not squarely address the Court of Appeal's holding that a voluntary assignment into bankruptcy should not be used to defeat a secured claim under valid provincial legislation and, in particular, that: "it is inappropriate for a CCAA applicant with a fiduciary duty to pension plan beneficiaries to seek to avoid those obligations to the benefit of a related party by invoking bankruptcy proceedings when no other creditor seeks to do so." However, the majority of the SCC appear to conclude that Indalex's motion to voluntarily enter into bankruptcy was itself not a breach of this fiduciary duty and that it should be open to do so provided that the conflict of interest between its corporate interests and its duties as plan administrator were meaningfully addressed at the same time.

It is expected that Canadian credit markets will be generally relieved with the majority holdings by the SCC in this case. The spectre of a constructive trust remedy has effectively been put back to the place it was prior to the Court of Appeal's ruling in this case. In addition, what constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty to pension plan beneficiaries in insolvency cases has been neatly refined to something that will be very manageable for debtors in future CCAA cases (effectively arranging for independent representation and notice for plan beneficiaries) – a process which has largely become a matter of practice in any event since the Court of Appeal's decision.

The one holding of the SCC which should be of note as a "game changer" (in the sense that it is likely a different conclusion from what was the generally held view prior to this case) is that the statutory deemed trust under the PBA has now been held to unequivocally apply to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up. Secured lenders will do well to keep this in mind as this will impact their priority position in all cases outside of a formal bankruptcy if a wind-up of a pension plan is initiated subsequent to their advance of credit.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.