Canada: Indalex: Supreme Court Of Canada (''SCC'') Upholds DIP Financing Priority

The SCC's decision in Indalex eliminates many of the concerns that arose from the Court of Appeal's ruling in this case. In a nutshell:

  • the super-priority of debtor-in-possession financing is upheld as overriding provincial deemed trusts;
  • the statutory deemed trust under Ontario's Pension Benefits Act (the "PBA") was upheld to apply to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up but not to the deficiency in a pension plan which is not in the process of being wound up. This should give some comfort to secured lenders, although the amount of the potentially higher ranking claim may exceed what they expected in the past;
  • what constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty to pension plan beneficiaries in insolvency cases has been limited to not arranging for independent representation and notice for plan beneficiaries. Ideally, corporations can avoid the issue entirely by having an independent pension plan committee; and
  • the use of a "constructive trust" remedy in this case was overturned.

As many readers of this Flash will already know, in the Indalex decision the Ontario Court of Appeal held that where a debtor has breached its fiduciary duties to pension plan beneficiaries, the Court may find that a "constructive trust" applies to the debtor's property (such as the proceeds resulting from the sale of its business) and, therefore, such property (or sale proceeds) must be used to fund the full amount of any pension plan deficiencies first ahead of anyone else – whether or not a statutory deemed trust applies to such pension obligations. The Court of Appeal also held that the statutory deemed trust under the PBA applies to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up.

The seven member panel of the Supreme Court of Canada released their reasons today holding (5 panel members to 2) that a "constructive trust" was not an appropriate remedy in this case. While Indalex had breached a fiduciary duty in failing to take steps to ensure that the pension plan beneficiaries had the opportunity to be fully represented (in particular, on the motion to approve the debtor-in-possession financing), such a breach in the circumstances of this case did not warrant overriding the super-priority granted to such debtor-in-possession financing by use of the constructive trust remedy.

That said, the SCC did uphold (4 panel members to 3) the Ontario Court of Appeal's opinion that the statutory deemed trust under the PBA applies to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up but concluded (in a different 4 to 3 mix) that, as a result of the application of the doctrine of federal paramountcy, the debtor-in-possession financing granted by the trial level court overseeing Indalex's proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (the "CCAA") had priority over this deemed trust. The SCC majority's basis for this conclusion was largely that the CCAA judge had considered factors that were relevant to the remedial objective of the CCAA and found that Indalex had in fact demonstrated that the CCAA's purpose in general would have been frustrated without the debtor-in-possession priority charge even though the CCAA judge did not specifically find that the recognition of the pension deemed trust specifically would frustrate the purpose of the CCAA proceeding.

It should be kept in mind that this case was decided in the context of the CCAA as it existed prior to the 2009 wholesale amendments that were made to such legislation. As such, relying on a paramountcy argument for priority in this case may not fully close the gate. The 2009 amendments now make debtor-in-possession financing an explicit statutory provision of the CCAA and specifically state that a court may order that such a charge rank in priority to any "secured creditor". Given how "secured creditor" is defined in the CCAA, there remains room to argue that the definition does not catch deemed trusts under the PBA thereby providing an avenue of attack to the paramountcy argument advanced in Indalex (as, arguably, there is now no inconsistency between federal and provincial law on this particular point). So, while the battle was certainly won in this case, the war might not be over just yet.

It is also worthy to note that, in its fiduciary duty analysis, the majority of the SCC rejected what has come to be known as the "two hats" characterization – i.e., a director only owes a fiduciary duty to pension plan members when acting as the plan administrator as opposed to when acting as a director of the corporation. Rather, the SCC held that the correct approach is to determine whether or not there is a conflict of interest between one's duties as a plan administrator versus as a corporate director. A conflict of interest arises when there is a "substantial risk" that the plan administrator duties would be "materially and adversely affected by" the director's duties to the corporation – and not, as the Court of Appeal had held, whenever a company makes decisions that have a potential to affect the plan beneficiaries. If there is a conflict of interest, a solution must be found to ensure that the plan members' interests are taken care of which may be putting the members on notice, finding a replacement administrator, appointing representative counsel or finding some other means to resolve the conflict. In this regard, commencing CCAA proceedings was not, on its own, seen as giving rise to such a conflict of interest. Furthermore, not providing notice to the plan beneficiaries on the initial CCAA application in this case was also held as not giving rise to a conflict of interest. However, the SCC did explicitly state that a debtor that finds itself in such a conflict of interest must bring the conflict to the attention of the judge overseeing the CCAA proceedings. It will then be up to the CCAA judge to decide how best to ensure that the interests of the plan beneficiaries are fully represented in the context of the CCAA proceedings – by appointing representative counsel, appointing an independent administrator, providing direct notice mechanics or otherwise.

The SCC also did not squarely address the Court of Appeal's holding that a voluntary assignment into bankruptcy should not be used to defeat a secured claim under valid provincial legislation and, in particular, that: "it is inappropriate for a CCAA applicant with a fiduciary duty to pension plan beneficiaries to seek to avoid those obligations to the benefit of a related party by invoking bankruptcy proceedings when no other creditor seeks to do so." However, the majority of the SCC appear to conclude that Indalex's motion to voluntarily enter into bankruptcy was itself not a breach of this fiduciary duty and that it should be open to do so provided that the conflict of interest between its corporate interests and its duties as plan administrator were meaningfully addressed at the same time.

It is expected that Canadian credit markets will be generally relieved with the majority holdings by the SCC in this case. The spectre of a constructive trust remedy has effectively been put back to the place it was prior to the Court of Appeal's ruling in this case. In addition, what constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty to pension plan beneficiaries in insolvency cases has been neatly refined to something that will be very manageable for debtors in future CCAA cases (effectively arranging for independent representation and notice for plan beneficiaries) – a process which has largely become a matter of practice in any event since the Court of Appeal's decision.

The one holding of the SCC which should be of note as a "game changer" (in the sense that it is likely a different conclusion from what was the generally held view prior to this case) is that the statutory deemed trust under the PBA has now been held to unequivocally apply to the amount of any deficit in a pension plan that is already in wind-up. Secured lenders will do well to keep this in mind as this will impact their priority position in all cases outside of a formal bankruptcy if a wind-up of a pension plan is initiated subsequent to their advance of credit.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions