Canada: Victim Of Vicious Assault Not Entitled To Accident Benefits Or Liability Coverages aka "My Right Foot"

Last Updated: January 25 2013
Article by Ralph D'Angelo

A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Martin v. 2064324 Ontario Inc. (Freeze Night Club) 2013 ONCA 19 addressed the extent to which the plaintiff Paul Martin was entitled to statutory accident benefits and other liability coverages from his automobile insurer, Certas Direct Insurance Company. One night, while in the parking lot of his night club workplace, Martin was accosted by two men who viciously assaulted him. They pepper sprayed him, beat and kicked him, slammed his head onto the surface of his car and forced him into the trunk of his own car and drove to another parking lot where the assaults continued. They broke two of his fingers and left him on the ground. The thugs then got back into Martin's car and drove over his right foot. After pepper spraying Martin again, they fled the scene in Martin's vehicle. Martin was able to crawl his way to his abandoned car and drive himself to a nearby hotel where he sought help.

Martin sustained a variety of injuries as a result of this incident. He claimed accident benefits as well as uninsured / unidentified / underinsured motorist coverage from his automobile insurer, Certas. All of these claims were denied by the insurer. Certas brought a summary judgment motion to have all of the claims dismissed. The motions judge dismissed the insurer's motion and permitted all of the claims to proceed to trial. Certas appealed.

In a unanimous decision authored by Madam Justice Cronk, Certas' appeal was allowed and all claims were dismissed against the insurer save and except any claims involving injuries to Martin's right foot.  The Court was required to address two issues: (1) whether Martin met the definition of "accident" for entitlement to accident benefits ("an incident in which the use or operation of an automobile directly causes an impairment") and (2) whether Martin's injuries arose "directly or indirectly from the use or operation of [an] automobile" so as to trigger coverage under s. 239(1) of the Insurance Act and, therefore, entitlement to uninsured / unidentified / underinsured motorist coverage.

Accident Benefits Entitlement

Madam Justice Cronk reviewed the judicial interpretation history of the definition of "accident" contained in the current accident benefits coverage. She noted that the Court of Appeal in the Chisholm and Greenhalgh cases had developed a modified causation test which required the Court to answer two questions: 

  1. Was the use or operation of the vehicle a cause of the injury?
  2. If so, was there an intervening act or acts that resulted in the injuries that cannot be said to be part of the "ordinary course of things"? In this sense, can it be said that the use or operation of the vehicle was "direct cause" of the injuries?

Madam Justice Cronk expressed considerable reservations as to whether Martin met the first branch of this modified test. She felt that there was a strong argument to be made that Martin's car was nothing more than the venue where many of the assaults occurred. However, she felt that the motions judge definitely failed to apply the second branch of the modified test i.e. the use or operation of the automobile must have directly caused the injuries. On this point, Madam Justice Cronk felt that the assaults visited upon Martin constituted intervening acts that cannot reasonably be said to be part of the "ordinary course of things" associated with the use or operation of Martin's automobile. The only exception to this was Martin's injury to his right foot – the direct cause of that injury was the operation of the car itself.

Madam Justice Cronk did leave the door open for Certas, however, even in relation to the foot injury. She said:

[60] On this record, it is unclear whether the mishap with Mr. Martin's foot was inadvertent or deliberate. If deliberate, it may be open to Certas to argue that this injury also constituted an intervening, intentional tort that falls outside the reach of the "ordinary course of things" associated with the use or operation of a vehicle.  It may also be open to Certas to contend that the renewed theft of Mr. Martin's vehicle in the second parking lot was itself an intervening event that broke the chain of causation between the use or operation of the vehicle and the foot injury.

[61] There is, therefore, at the very least, a genuine issue requiring a trial to determine whether the injury to Mr. Martin's right foot was sustained in an "accident", in the sense contemplated by s. 2(1) of the 1996 Schedule. In respect of that injury and the SABs associated with it, I conclude that Certas is not entitled to summary judgment.

Martin attempted to argue that, once one injury qualified for accident benefits entitlement, then all injuries passed through the "SABS door". Madam Justice Cronk rejected this argument and noted that the SABS definition of "accident" refers to "an impairment". Accordingly, only the impairments which meet the SABS causation test qualify for accident benefits coverage.

Section 239(1) Claims

With respect to the liability coverages, Madam Justice Cronk reviewed the Supreme Court of Canada's decisions in Vytlingam and Herbison  and concluded that the appropriate test involves looking at whether there is "an unbroken chain of causation linking the conduct of the motorist as a motorist to the injuries in respect of which the claim is made".

She concluded that, but for the right foot injury, Martin's injuries arose from the assaults inflicted upon him by the assailants. The fact that some of the assaults occurred in or near his vehicle did not satisfy the causal connection envisaged by the Supreme Court's test. Accordingly, Martin was not entitled to uninsured / unidentified / underinsured motorist coverage – except for his right foot injury.

Implications of Decision

We would expect that the factual circumstances which arose in this case are rare. However, one can see how such complicated facts pose a challenge for claims handlers and courts alike. Adjusters will be required to apply the causation test to each injury sustained by a claimant. In this case, potentially, Martin will only be entitled to accident benefits in relation to the injuries and disability arising from his right foot being run over. As a practical matter, how is the insurer to apply this ruling over the life time of the claim file? Martin likely suffered a myriad of physical and psychological injuries as a result of the incident as a whole. His treatment plans will cover all of these injuries. Presumably, treatment providers can only bill the insurer for treatment related to the right foot injury. What if Martin cannot afford treatment for his other injuries and this lack of treatment impacts his recovery in relation to his right foot injury? What about the psychological injuries? How can a treating psychologist parse out the psychological injuries related to Martin's right foot injury from those related to the incident generally? What does the insurer pay for?

These challenges will also be faced by the insurer when addressing Martin's tort compensation payable pursuant to the uninsured / unidentified / underinsured motorist coverage.

We are also puzzled by the Court's decision in relation to whether a deliberate act / intentional tort involving the use or operation of an automobile affects the availability of automobile insurance coverage to the innocent victims of such incidents. The Court seemed to suggest that, if the insurer can prove this, accident benefits coverage could be denied to Martin. This places the victims and insurers in the difficult position of having to prove the intentions of a perpetrator who may not even be identified let alone be willing to testify as to what transpired on the occasion in question. Should the intentions of the criminal determine the extent of insurance coverage available to their victim?

This decision provides a good summary of the applicable principles for deciding whether the SABS definition of "accident" has been met or whether liability coverage is triggered. However, one can sense that the court struggled with the application of those principles in the context of a complicated factual matrix. At the end of the day, the insurer was left with more uncertainty than certainty, even though it "won" the appeal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions