Siskinds LLP are most popular:
- within Corporate/Commercial Law and Consumer Protection topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- with readers working within the Technology and Law Firm industries
Two recent cases have reached opposite conclusions about what counts as a "contaminant" under Ontario's Environmental Protection Act (EPA). Neither case seems to make much environmental sense. Why is flyrock a "contaminant", when reflected light that lures millions of birds to their deaths is not? Why does the EPA, and the Ministry of the Environment, protect buildings but not wildlife?
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.