Canada: Mineral Claims And The Duty To Consult In Yukon

Last Updated: January 22 2013

Article by Brian Abraham and Emma Irving

On December 27, 2012, the Yukon Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Ross River Dena Council v Government of Yukon, 2012 YKCA 14. The decision related to an appeal of Mr. Justice Veale's decision regarding the claim of the Ross River Dena Council ("RRDC") against the Yukon Government.

The appeal concerned the duty of Yukon to consult with RRDC when allowing mineral claims to be recorded over land on which RRDC has asserted claims of Aboriginal title and Aboriginal rights. RRDC appealed from the Chambers Judge's decision that only notice was required to be given to RRDC for recorded claims within their territory.

RRDC claims Aboriginal title over some 63,000 sq. kilometres of the southeast part of Yukon, comprising of approximately 13% of Yukon.

Under the Yukon Quartz Mining Act, SY 2003, c 14, mineral rights can be obtained by physically staking a claim and then recording it with the Mining Recorder. The staker is then entitled to ownership of the minerals within the claim and to conduct certain exploration activities without notice or government authorization.

The Court of Appeal found that RRDC had strong claims to at least some parts of their traditional territory. The Court also found that under the system in place, at the time of trial, certain (class one) exploratory work could be carried out by a claim holder without consultation and that such work could adversely affect claimed Aboriginal rights.

The Court found, in adopting the reasoning in Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 SCC 73, [2004] 3 SCR 511 ("Haida"), that while the Crown is entitled to manage resources it must do so only with due consideration of the effect on Aboriginal rights. The Crown must engage in bona fide consultation with a view to accommodating these rights before authorizing any activities that could adversely affect those interests. The nature of the consultation depends on the strength of the claim and the potential adverse effect on such rights.

The Court discussed the "open entry" mining regime in Yukon and also referenced that a claim holder could undertake a class one exploration program without any notice or permits. The Court did acknowledge the requirements of the Yukon Environmental and Socioeconomic Assessment Act, SC 2003, c 7 which requires consultation with First Nations. The Court found that, while class one exploration programs are less intensive and cover smaller areas than class two, three and four programs, they can still have a substantial impact on the land.

In addressing the question as to whether or not the recording of a claim triggered consultation, the Court accepted the reasoning in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carriers Sekani Tribal Council, 2010 SCC 43, [2010] 2 SCR 650 ("Rio Tinto"). Rio Tinto, a Supreme Court of Canada decision, described the three elements of the test to determine whether the Crown's duty to consult is triggered as being:

  1. the Crown's knowledge of a potential Aboriginal claim;
  2. the contemplated Crown conduct; and
  3. the potential that the contemplated conduct may adversely affect an Aboriginal claim or right.

The Court found the first element of the test, knowledge of the Plaintiff's asserted Aboriginal claim, had been met because negotiations had been previously carried out affecting the claim. The Court addressed the issue that the Kaska, RRDC, did not need to establish Aboriginal rights and title within its traditional territory, since the Yukon Government did not dispute that "the claim [of RRDC] is a serious one with sufficient credibility to satisfy the first element of the Haida test".

The Court also found that the third element of the Haida test was met on the grounds that by transferring mineral rights to quartz mining claim holders the Crown engaged in conduct inconsistent with the recognition of Aboriginal title. In addition, the Court found that the right to carry out class one exploration activities could "seriously impede or prevent the enjoyment of some Aboriginal rights in more than a transient or trivial manner".

The Court determined that the real issue between the parties was whether or not the recording of a claim resulted in the obligation to consult since once a claim is staked the recorder must record the claim. The Yukon Government argued that there are no actions required on the part of the Government in granting a claim since the right to stake and record a claim did not require any approval from the Crown. The Yukon Government's position was that, as long as the statutory requirements are met, the granting of a mineral claim is automatic. The Court, however, found that under Section 15 of the Quartz Mining Act the Government had a broad discretion to create reserves and in the exercise of that discretion it could prevent staking within the reserved areas.

The Court also noted that the duty to consult exists to ensure that the Crown, in managing its resources, does not ignore Aboriginal claims. The Court stated "[s]tatutory regimes that do not allow for consultation and fail to provide any other equally effective means to acknowledge and accommodate Aboriginal claims are defective and cannot be allowed to subsist". The Court found the failure of the Crown to provide any discretion in the recording of claims was the source of the problem. Even though the Court found that the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty means that governments can pass legislation, there is still a duty to consult and governments cannot justify the absence of consultation in the carrying out of a statutory regime.

The Court addressed the issue of the need for confidentiality in acquiring mineral titles because of the "open entry" concept and that such a system has "considerable value in maintaining a viable mining industry and encouraging prospecting". However, the Court went on to say that "[i]t must, however, be modified in order for the Crown to act in accordance with its constitutional duties" and that mere notice cannot be the sole mechanism of consultation.

In addressing the question of what consultation is required, the Court found that it was not necessary or appropriate for the Court to specify precisely how the legislation can be brought into conformity with the requirements of Haida. The Court also made no finding as to whether or not the consultation that had previously occurred, which resulted in a staking prohibition of some 4,800 sq. kilometres of the lands claimed by RRDC, was consultation in accordance with the requirements of the Haida decision.

The Court found that "[t]he location and recording of a quartz mining claim, in and of itself, is not likely to interfere with claims to Aboriginal rights other than title. It is the actual performance of work on the land that may affect such claimed rights". The Court found specifically that the system in place did not address concerns relating to the effect of class one exploration activities on Aboriginal claims. The Court also found that the Crown must consult with RRDC regarding class one exploration activities that could have serious or long lasting adverse effects on Aboriginal rights. Notice of such proposed activities and an opportunity to consult must be given to First Nations.

The Court noted that Section 15 reserves may not be the ideal instrument for dealing with Aboriginal rights given the importance of the open entry system to the mining industry and the Yukon economy, however, it was "open to the Legislature to fashion a more flexible or precise statutory mechanism".

In the result, the Court made the following declarations:

  1. the Yukon Government has a duty to consult with RRDC on whether mineral rights on Crown lands within the Ross River Area might be made available to third parties; and
  2. the Yukon Government has a duty to notify, and where appropriate consult and accommodate, RRDC before allowing any mining exploration within the Ross River Area.

The Court suspended the declaration for a period of one year to allow the Government to address the problems.

In the course of issuing the above decision, the Court also addressed the issue as to whether or not the Yukon Chamber of Mines had a right to appear as an intervenor on the appeal. The Court found that in order to appear as an intervenor on an appeal it was necessary to apply for such status to the Court of Appeal rather than the Supreme Court. This issue arose in the context of the parties appearing to have assumed throughout the course of the proceedings that the right to be named as a party in an appeal, and to intervene at the appellate level, arose as a result of the party's intervenor status at the Supreme Court level.

About Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP (FMC)

FMC is one of Canada's leading business and litigation law firms with more than 500 lawyers in six full-service offices located in the country's key business centres. We focus on providing outstanding service and value to our clients, and we strive to excel as a workplace of choice for our people. Regardless of where you choose to do business in Canada, our strong team of professionals possess knowledge and expertise on regional, national and cross-border matters. FMC's well-earned reputation for consistently delivering the highest quality legal services and counsel to our clients is complemented by an ongoing commitment to diversity and inclusion to broaden our insight and perspective on our clients' needs. Visit:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
14 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Save the date. It’s that time of the year to mark your calendars for the opportunity to earn the rest of your CPD credits all in one day!

27 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Dentons is pleased to sponsor the Global Property Market Forum taking place November 27, 2018 in Toronto.

30 Nov 2018, Conference, Toronto, Canada

Dentons is proud to be the presenting sponsor for Autonomous Vehicle P3s: Visions of the Future at this year’s CCPPP conference in Toronto on Nov 5-6, 2018.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions