Canada: Yukon Court Of Appeal Finds Duty To Consult Exists When Recording Mineral Claims

Last Updated: January 8 2013
Article by Robin M. Junger and Brittnee Russell

On December 27, 2012, the Yukon Court of Appeal ruled in Ross River Dena Council v. Government of Yukon, 2012 YKCA 14 that the Yukon government has a duty to consult with First Nations when recording mineral claims in the First Nation's asserted traditional territory (i.e. non-treaty area). This decision is significant because the Court found the duty to consult exists even though the relevant legislation gave essentially no discretion to the officials recording the claims.

Summary of the Case

The Yukon Quartz Mining Act allows an individual to obtain mineral rights by physically staking a claim and subsequently recording the claim with the Yukon Mining Recorder. The Mining Recorder has no discretion to refuse to record a claim if it complies with the technical mineral claim staking requirements of the act. Once a mineral claim is recorded, the Quartz Mining Act allows for certain "Class 1" exploration activities to be carried out on the land without further permits or authorizations, and without further notice to the Yukon government or any aboriginal consultation. The Ross River Dena Council sought declarations that the Yukon government has a duty to consult in these circumstances with respect to the recording of mineral claims within its asserted territory and that this duty was breached by a lack of consultation prior to recording such claims.

In the decision, the Court considered the application of the principles from Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests) ("Haida")1in this context. The Court found that it was clear the Yukon government had notice of the aboriginal rights and title claims (the first part of the Haida inquiry); however, the Court's analysis of the next two questions was not quite as simple.

1. Was there "contemplated Crown conduct"?

The Court found that contemplated Crown conduct was present, even though the recording of the mineral claim is mandatory under the Quartz Mining Act with very limited exceptions. The Court noted that discretion in recording mineral claims was not entirely absent in the Quartz Mining Act, citing the prohibition of recording mineral claims in particular areas, but found that in any event the lack of discretion in the recording of claims does not absolve the Crown of the duty to consult.

2. Were asserted aboriginal rights and title affected by such conduct?

The Court found that asserted aboriginal rights and title were affected by the recording of mineral claims. More specifically, the Court noted the impact of such recording on asserted aboriginal title, stating in paragraph 32:

There can also be no doubt that the third element of the Haida test is made out where the Crown registers a quartz mining claim within the plaintiff's claimed territory. Aboriginal title includes mineral rights (see Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010, at para. 122). In transferring mineral rights to quartz mining claim holders, the Crown engages in conduct that is inconsistent with the recognition of Aboriginal title.2

The Court also noted that the recording provides authorization – without further government approvals or aboriginal consultation – for Class 1 exploration activities, which have the potential to physically affect the exercise of asserted aboriginal rights or title. These authorized activities included, among other things, tree clearing and the use of explosives.

Having found a duty to consult to exist, the Court then went on to find that the provision of notice to the Ross River Dena Council did not amount to adequate consultation in this case. It noted that where Class 1 exploration activities will have serious effects on asserted aboriginal rights, consultation should occur before such activities take place. The Court stated at paragraph 37:

Statutory regimes that do not allow for consultation and fail to provide any other equally effective means to acknowledge and accommodate Aboriginal claims are defective and cannot be allowed to subsist.

The decision of the Court was suspended for one year to allow the Yukon government to make legislative changes to provide for aboriginal consultation.

Questions that Arise

1. Does the ruling call into question BC mineral tenure legislation?

Much of the province of BC is subject to asserted but unproven aboriginal rights and title, as was the case with the area of the Yukon at issue in this case. This raises the question of whether the duty to consult would be found to exist in relation to the recording of mineral claims in such areas under the BC Mineral Tenure Act, particularly since the Yukon Court of Appeal is comprised of justices of the BC Court of Appeal.

It is however not clear to what extent this decision has relevance to the BC Mineral Tenure Act, as much of the Court's decision seems to be premised on the fact that recording a mineral claim in the Yukon under the Quartz Mining Act resulted in authorization to undertake certain exploration activities without any further permits or consultation, which is not presently the case in BC. The Court stated at paragraph 51:

At least where Class 1 exploration activities will have serious or long-lasting adverse effects on claimed Aboriginal rights, the Crown must be in a position to engage in consultations with First Nations before the activities are allowed to take place. (emphasis added)

In BC, no such activities are authorized by the recording of a claim alone.

However, as noted above, the Court also seemed to say in paragraph 32 that the mere fact that a right to the minerals is acquired upon staking gives rise to a duty to consult, based on impacts to asserted aboriginal title. It is not readily apparent whether or how a Court might distinguish the Yukon legislation from that of BC on this basis, as both convey rights to minerals, albeit with somewhat different language. This is perhaps the least developed aspect of the Court's reasons, as the Court does not discuss in any detail the true "impact" on aboriginal title of gaining a right to minerals when that right is in fact so heavily dependent upon numerous and often very challenging further approvals that are the subject of extensive aboriginal consultation. For all the "rights" to minerals acquired in BC each year through staking, exceedingly few ever result in a mine being developed and minerals being extracted.

2. Will the ruling affect the government of BC's recent initiative for de-permitting low-risk exploration activity?

Amendments were made to the BC Mines Act in late 2011 to allow the government to pass regulations to exempt low-risk exploration activities from permitting requirements. In November 2012, the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas released a discussion paper outlining the proposed exempt activities and, in a related Q&A document, noted that aboriginal consultation with respect to the exempt activities would consist of notice.3 It will be interesting to see whether and how this case affects the government's ultimate decision as to which if any low-risk activities it will exempt. The period for comments on the discussion paper closed on December 25, 2012.

3. What does this case mean for the larger question of whether a duty to consult exists in relation to legislative acts?

In a single, short paragraph that is certain to become to focus of much academic debate, the Court addressed what is one of the most significant outstanding questions in the law of aboriginal consultation. It said:

I acknowledge that in Rio Tinto the Supreme Court of Canada left open the question of whether "government conduct" includes legislative action. I read that reservation narrowly, however. It may be that the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty precludes the imposition of a requirement that governments consult with First Nations before introducing legislation (see Reference Re Canada Assistance Plan (B.C.),[1991] 2 S.C.R. 525 at 563). Such a limitation on the duty to consult would, however, only apply to the introduction of the legislation itself, and could not justify the absence of consultation in the carrying out of a statutory regime.

In any case, the decision as a whole, and this paragraph in particular, raises a number of further and subsidiary questions that are – sooner or later – going to require attention from the Supreme Court of Canada. They include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • If legislation would affect asserted aboriginal rights and title, is it now always necessary for that legislation to include some discretionary decision-making and allow for related aboriginal consultation before the legislation can be in keeping with section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982?
  • If the legislation does not provide for such discretion, can the duty to consult be met through the development of the legislation itself?4
  • How would the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty apply in the face of competing interests that are protected by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and thus of a higher status than traditional common law concepts?

These are all very interesting and important questions that are raised but not answered by the decision. It will therefore be interesting to see if leave to the Supreme Court of Canada is sought and, if so, whether it is granted.


1 2004 SCC 73

2 In Delgamuukw at paras. 125-132, the Supreme Court of Canada also discussed certain inherent limits on the use to which aboriginal title lands could be put by aboriginal groups, so it is not inevitable that a finding of aboriginal title would allow an aboriginal group to mine minerals below title lands. This was not however at issue in this case.

3 See The Q&A document is available here:

4 The Court of Appeal seems to suggest that is the case, as it comments in some detail on the process that preceded the development of the Yukon legislation in question here, though it did not find that alone was sufficient to meet the duty to consult in this case.

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2013 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Robin M. Junger
Brittnee Russell
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.