Further to Davis LLP's earlier
blog, the second of two omnibus federal budget
bills has undergone its third parliamentary
reading and was passed in the House of Commons on December 5, 2012
and is now before the Senate. Described by Government as an
implementation tool, the Bill (C-45), will amend and repeal parts
of various enactments to further the key initiatives
of Canada's Economic Action Plan
2012 (the "Action Plan"). In particular the
initative to complete the regulatory regime required
for Responsible Resource Development defined
as "the Government of Canada's plan to create
jobs, growth, and long-term prosperity for all Canadians by
streamlining the review process for major resource
projects" and further described here. Responsible Resource Development is
one of several categories proposed in the Action
Plan designed to improve business investment in Canada. Other
categories include: investing in natural resources; expanding trade
and operating in new markets, neutralizing
certain preferential taxes and expanding tax relief for
investment in clean energy; improving economic conditions for
farmers and fishermen; strengthening business competitiveness; and,
developing Canada's financial sector advantage.
The changes under Bill C-45, if passed by the Senate in the
same form, will the receive royal assent. If assented to, the
changes will expand on the previous Act, closing loopholes,
clarifying requirements and creating
greater certainty of project reviews.
The last time Parliament considered changes of this magnitude
was in 2007, however the bill (called C-32) died on the Order
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
We've previously reported on the Ernst case, which yesterday was in the Supreme Court of Canada for argument of Jessica Ernst's allegation that the Alberta Energy Regulator (Board) breached her Charter right to freedom of expression.
On January 13, 2016, the BC Supreme Court released a decision with guidance respecting a common feature of environmental assessment, namely provincial/federal harmonization of reviews and corresponding decisions.
Last week the BC Supreme Court released its decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment), holding the Province could not rely on a federal / provincial environmental assessment "equivalency agreement"...
In its recent decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment), the B.C. Supreme Court held that the provincial government retains authority to impose conditions on the proposed Northern Gateway Project.