Townsend v Sun Life Financial, 2012 FC 550, confirms
the Federal Court's reluctance to award damages for trivial
breaches of privacy under Section 16 of the Personal
Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).
In this case, Sun Life Financial accidentally copied a letter
containing sensitive medical information to the individual's
insurance advisor. Sun Life Financial acknowledged the privacy
breach in sending the letter.
The Court reiterated and followed its position in Randall v
Nubodys Fitness Centres, 2010 FC 681 at para. 55
[Randall] that a reward for damages under Section 16 of
PIPEDA should be made "only in the most egregious of
circumstances." In assessing the seriousness of the breach,
the Court considered the impact of the breach on the individual,
Sun Life Financial's conduct, and whether Sun Life Financial
benefited from the breach.
Here, the Court found the impact on the individual was minimal,
as the disclosure was limited to the individual's insurance
advisor, who appeared not to have noticed the personal information
and promptly destroyed the letter upon request. Moreover, the Court
found Sun Life Financial's conduct to be commendable, both in
acknowledging the error and informing the individual of the
disclosure, and in taking steps to promptly correct its policies
and procedures. The Court dismissed the application.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Join Bereskin & Parr partners Susan Keri and Terry Edwards on Wednesday, May 3rd, 2017 for an in-depth discussion with prominent lawyers from the EU and UK about trademark issues for Canadian businesses doing or planning to do business in Europe.
Earlier this year, a Canadian trial court ruled that Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act ("PIPEDA") has extra-territorial application and restricts the dissemination of personal information of Canadians ..
While much has been written about the impending CASL private rights of action, less has been said about the new private right of action CASL will tack on to the Competition Act for misrepresentations in electronic messages.
Potential damages of up to $1 million per day may be imposed. I refer to the blog by Aaron Baer "Are You Compliant With Canada's Anti-Spam Law? If Not, Expect Lawsuits Starting on July 1 of This Year."
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).