Canada: A Franchisor’s Obligation To Protect Its Brand

Last Updated: December 11 2012
Article by Bruno Floriani and Kiran Singh

The Quebec Superior Court in the recent case of Bertico Inc. v. Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd., ordered Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd., the franchisor, to pay more than C$16MM in damages, the full amount of their claim, to twenty-one former franchisees for repeatedly failing to protect and enhance the Dunkin' Donuts brand in Quebec over the course of a decade. This landmark decision may be seen to impose a burdensome obligation on franchisors, and an analysis of the Court's reasoning is warranted in light of the exceptional circumstances of this case.


The Dunkin' Donuts fast-food coffee and donuts business was a very successful franchise network in the province of Quebec. There were over 250 Dunkin' Donuts establishments in Quebec until the mid-1990's. At that time, Tim Hortons, a very successful chain of fast-food coffee and donut shops in other Canadian markets, began an aggressive foray into the Quebec market and was seen to be rapidly gaining market share. In 1996, Dunkin' Donuts franchisees notified the franchisor that the competition from Tim Hortons was fierce and affected their business. Yet, these franchisees claimed that their franchisor did not react. In fact, 200 Dunkin' Donuts locations closed between 1995 and 2005.

In 2000, the franchisor introduced a voluntary remodelling incentive program to combat Tim Hortons' takeover of the market, whose goal was to encourage franchisees operating no less than 75 Dunkin' Donuts shops to renovate prior to being contractually required to do so pursuant to their franchise agreements. The franchisor stated that it would make incentive payments to those of its franchisees who spent at least C$200k renovating their shops, provided that such franchisees signed a full and final release in favour of the franchisor.

The franchisor attributed Tim Hortons' takeover of the market to the fact that the Dunkin' Donuts franchisees were operating "tireworn stores" and were not working as hard as they should have been. The franchisor further argued that it was not an insurer for its franchisees and in no way guaranteed their success and that the franchisees had signed releases and were therefore barred from claiming damages. The Dunkin' Donuts franchisees wholly denied any fault and argued that the franchisor did not react in the face of structured and thought-out competition. The franchisees sought the termination of their franchise agreements and leases as well as damages.


The Court held that the franchisor breached its contractual obligations as well as obligations that are implicit in franchise agreements. The Court interpreted a provision in the franchise agreement as imposing on the franchisor the obligation to "protect and enhance the reputation of Dunkin' Donuts and the demand for the products of the Dunkin' Donuts system". The Court held that the franchisor did not meet this principal obligation which it assigned to itself in the franchise agreements and must accept the consequences of its failure. The court further observed that the franchisor made a "huge and costly mistake" by allowing Tim Hortons to capture the lions' share of the Quebec fast food donuts and coffee market between 1995 and 2003. The Court found that the greatest failing of the franchisor was to fail to protect its brand in Quebec and stated that "when a brand falls out of bed, collapses, so too do those who rely upon it".

The Court completely rejected the franchisor's argument that the franchisees were poor franchisees and the architects of their own demise and held that this defence was "utterly devoid of substance". The Court also firmly rejected the cross-claims of the franchisor to the effect that certain of the plaintiff-franchisees failed to pay arrears of royalties, ad-fund contributions and other similar sums, finding that when a contract is fundamentally breached by one of the parties, the other cannot be held accountable for a subsequent breach by it.

As for the full and final releases executed by certain of the plaintiff-franchisees, the Court annulled them on the basis of their being abusive and consent having been vitiated or non-existent. The Court found that the franchisor did not meet its obligations under the remodelling incentive program, and that the full and final releases were "overkill, ill advised, and in a time when the franchisees were struggling to survive, it was abusive to impose it upon those who chose to adopt the franchisor's recommendations, albeit under false pretences and on the faith of representations that turned out to be false".


This potentially landmark decision is based on a breach of contract by the franchisor, as well as breaches by the franchisor of obligations flowing from general principles of Quebec civil law, among which the requirements that: (i) a party to a contract must perform its contractual obligations in good faith, and (ii) each party to a contract is bound by obligations "that are incident to it according to its nature and in conformity with usage, equity or law".

While some commentators have noted that the Court may have incorrectly interpreted various provisions of the franchise agreement in finding an express covenant of the franchisor to protect and enhance its brand, in our view the more fundamental finding of the Court is that it is "an underlying assumption of all franchise agreements" that the "brand will support a viable commerce" and that "franchisors are bound by an obligation of good faith and of loyalty towards their franchisees such that they are duty bound to work in concert with them...". The Court cites with approval the following passage in the Quebec Court of Appeal decisionin Provigo Distribution Inc. vs. Supermarché A.R.G. Inc. and Supermarché Frontenac Inc. [1998] R.J.Q. 47 (C.A.) (the "Provigo Decision"):

"... [the franchisor], bound by an obligation of good faith and loyalty toward the [franchisee], had the duty to work with its franchisee and provide it with the necessary tools to at least minimize the impact of any economic prejudice that could be caused, if not to prevent it altogether. Between doing absolutely nothing and maintaining the status quo, which might have cost it its place in the market, and exercising its right to compete freely with third parties, there is a middle ground. [...] It should have worked with the franchisees to establish an adequate marketing response that would have enabled them to minimize their losses and reposition themselves in an evolving market."

In the courts' view, a franchisor has an obligation to help its franchisees compete effectively in the market and a franchisor who sits idly by while its brand is suffering may be liable to compensate its franchisees for their loss. The Court expressed its conclusion in very strong language that could be viewed as sending a warning to all franchisors in Quebec:

"But the greatest failing of all was [the franchisor's] failure to protect its brand in the Quebec market. No doubt the host of failings chronicled by the Franchisees contributed to the collapse of the Dunkin' Donuts brand in Quebec. A successful brand is crucial to the maintenance of healthy franchisees. However, when the brand falls out of bed, collapses, so too do those who rely upon it. And this is precisely what has happened in this case."

However, the facts underlying this decision are highly particular. The fall of the retail goliath that was Dunkin Donuts' in Quebec was extraordinary and perhaps an extreme example of how an established giant in a market cannot remain oblivious to competing forces. It appears from the tone of this decision that the Court, in rendering its judgment, was heavily influenced by the severe fall from grace and decimation of the Dunkin' Donuts system: " is a sad saga of how a once successful franchise operation, a leader in its field, fell precipitously from grace in less than a decade". In fact, the Court interpreted the franchisor's requirement for a release from its franchisees in connection with its remodelling incentive program as "... a requirement to forgive the sins of the past - some five years of benign neglect in the face of a determined new player in the Quebec fast food market...".

The franchisor has appealed this ruling and the Court of Appeal proceedings will hopefully provide guidance regarding the scope and extent of the implicit obligation of a franchisor to protect its brand in Quebec.

Nevertheless, the confirmation of basic principles of Quebec civil law as applied to franchising relationships, including by the Quebec Court of Appeal in the Provigo Decision, should give pause to franchisors entering the Quebec market.

At the very least, we would caution against including statements in the franchise agreement that could in any way be interpreted as representations as to the reputation and standing of its brand or covenants to protect or enhance the brand or increase the demand for its products.

Despite the very unique circumstances leading to this decision and the Provigo Decision, the obligation of good faith and the duty of loyalty that franchisors owe to their franchisees under Quebec law would seem to require, as an implicit obligation in Quebec law, that franchisors proactively communicate and work with their franchisees in addressing significant market forces they are facing and avoid conduct that could be interpreted as complacent with respect to competitive forces in the marketplace. Of course, we would note that this constitutes good business practices in any event, and that franchisors should be encouraged to act in good faith in all circumstances but, beyond that, franchisors should attempt to take some form of remedial action particularly when their franchise network is facing a calamitous situation such as the one faced by the Dunkin' Donuts franchise from 1995 to 2005 in the province of Quebec.

We will continue to monitor and report on developments in this fascinating case and, more generally, the interpretation that Quebec courts give to the franchisor's duty of loyalty to its franchisees. In the meantime, caution is urged in the Quebec market until further clarifications emerge.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Robinson Sheppard Shapiro L.L.P.
Aird & Berlis LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Robinson Sheppard Shapiro L.L.P.
Aird & Berlis LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions