Canada: Mark Higgins Rallying (A Firm) v. The Commissioners For Her Majesty's Revenue And Customs - A Guide To Management And Control

Last Updated: October 7 2012
Article by Sebastian Elawny and Sophie Virji

Since the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in St. Michael Trust Corp., as Trustee of the Fundy Settlement v. Her Majesty the Queen.,1 the tax community has been abuzzwith the fact that trusts are now subject to the same "central management and control" test applicable to corporations when determining the residence of a trust. In Mark Higgins Rallying (a firm) v. The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs,2 theFirst-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) concluded that the "management and control" testapplicable to corporations was also applicable to partnerships. That case conducted an excellent analysis of what this phrase really means from a UK context. In a nutshell, theTribunal concluded that the case law has identified the following principles:

(1) The residence of a company is where the directors meet and transact their business and exercise the powers conferred upon them;

(2) The determination of management and control is a question of fact and, consequently, there is no presumption that management and control will be found where the directors meet;

(3) In considering the facts, it must be determined (a) who was managing the business by making high-level decisions, and (b) where those persons were making such decisions.


In the Mark Higgins Rallying case, Mark Higgins, a motor rally driver, and Roy Dixon, a former rally driver, were both residents of the Isle of Man. Upon discovering Mr. Higgins' immense driving talents, Mr. Dixon saw a business opportunity and agreed to mentor, manage, and sponsor Mr. Higgins' rally career. In addition to being an astute businessman, Mr. Dixon was also a qualified solicitor in the United Kingdom with extensive experience drafting partnership agreements and business contracts.

In 1991, Mr. Dixon and Mr. Higgins entered into a partnership agreement,3 pursuant to which the two men agreed to combine Mr. Dixon's management and commercial experience with Mr. Higgins' driving skills (the "Partnership"). Mr. Dixon's plan was for Mr. Higgins to compete on the world rally scene and, consequently, the Partnership carried on business throughout the world and not just in the United Kingdom.

In 1993, Mr. Higgins moved his family to the United Kingdom to commence the running of a rally school, while he continued to compete in worldwide rally racing. In 1997, the first year in which the Partnership became profitable, Mr. Higgins and Mr. Dixon agreed to vary the terms of the partnership agreement with the primary purpose being to change the profit-sharing structure. As a result of the new structure, Mr. Dixon was precluded from receiving any UK sourced income from the Partnership.

Despite Mr. Higgins' move to the United Kingdom, the working basis of the Partnership was always that Mr. Higgins concentrated on fulfilling his passion for driving while Mr. Dixon contributed commercial and management experience. Mr. Dixon reviewed all contracts to determine whether they were appropriate. All major contracts of the Partnership, except for one, were executed outside of the United Kingdom. Due to Mr. Higgins' involvement in rally racing, most opportunities arose through his personal contacts and communications generally occurred by email or telephone. All major decisions were made by Mr. Dixon in the Isle of Man, where he continued to live throughout the life of the Partnership.

For the purposes of UK tax law,4 a partnership that is managed and controlled outside of the United Kingdom will be treated as a separate person and, therefore, non-UK sourced profits are not taxable in the United Kingdom until they are paid out to a UK resident partner. Conversely, a partnership that is at least partially managed and controlled inside the United Kingdom will not be treated as a separate person, and, therefore, a UK resident partner's non-UK sourced profits are immediately taxable in the United Kingdom at the time they are earned.

The Commissioners for her Majesty's Revenue and Customs ("HMRC") in the United Kingdom took issue with the Partnership, arguing that management and control of the Partnership took place in the United Kingdom, and, therefore, all income earned by Mr. Higgins through the Partnership should be taxed as it arose. In support of its position, HMRC argued that while Mr. Higgins relied on Mr. Dixon at the inception of the Partnership, Mr. Higgins became an established professional able to make business decisions for himself. While Mr. Dixon brought his legal background in reviewing contracts to the table, this was the extent of his contribution to the Partnership. Conversely, the rallying, teaching, and seeking sponsorship opportunities, all of which were carried out by Mr. Higgins, constituted the substantive decision making part of the business. HMRC argued that the place where contracts were signed was irrelevant because the decisions to enter into such contracts were made well before they were signed. HMRC concluded that because the activities of the Partnership were carried on in the United Kingdom by Mr. Higgins, management and control resided, at least partially, in the United Kingdom.

The Partnership took the position that it was wholly managed and controlled outside the United Kingdom because all decision making, partnership meetings, and contracts were made outside of the United Kingdom, and thus Mr. Higgins was only taxable once the Partnership distributed income to him. The Partnership further argued that the occasional act of high-level management performed in the United Kingdom did not affect management and control of the Partnership.

Relying on the UK Court of Appeal's decision in Padmore v. IRC,5the Partnership argued that the determination of where a partnership is managed and controlled depends on the place where the highest level of decision making takes place and not where the day-to-day business operations are carried out. That case involved a partnership of 110 chartered patent agents that were active as trademark agents, the majority of which were resident in the United Kingdom. The Court of Appeal had no trouble finding, however, that despite the fact that the majority of partners were resident in the United Kingdom, the partnership was managed and controlled in Jersey because the business operations had always been carried on in Jersey, the two general partners were residents of Jersey, general meetings of the partners were held in Jersey four times a year, all policy matters and decisions were dealt with at these meetings, and the Jersey-resident managing partners implemented all of the policy matters and decisions.

Findings of the Tribunal

Once the Tribunal had concluded that the corporate test for management and control was applicable to partnerships, it was simply a matter of applying the test to the facts.

The corporate test requires a determination of where central management and control is situated by looking to where high-level decisions are made. The Tribunal concluded that while the determination must be made for each disputed tax year, residence of the Partnership will not fluctuate from year to year merely by reason of individual acts of management and control taking place in different territories. Consequently, it is necessary to apply the facts to take a picture as a whole to determine who was managing the Partnership by making high-level decisions and where such decisions were being made.6

There is no presumption that a company will be resident where contracts (including important ones) are signed or in the place where directors meetings are held. While both may be evidence towards where decisions were being made, they are not the determining factors. What is relevant, however, is where the decision making in relation to those contracts and the directors' meetings actually takes place.

Taking a look at the picture as a whole, the Tribunal found that the basis of the formation of the Partnership and the continuing purpose of the Partnership was to combine Mr. Higgins' driving skills with Mr. Dixon's business acumen and expertise. Throughout the existence of the Partnership, Mr. Higgins relied on Mr. Dixon's commercial expertise and did not enter into any significant commercial commitments without referring them to Mr. Dixon for a decision. The Tribunal concluded that management and control of the Partnership in the relevant years was situated wholly outside the United Kingdom because Mr. Dixon, as the commercial brains of the Partnership, made all the high-level decisions of the Partnership from his office in the Isle of Man.

From a Canadian Perspective

Although Mark Higgins Rallying dealt with partnerships, the fact that the corporate test for management and control was appropriate for determining residency makes the case relevant for Canadian tax purposes. The management and control test has been adopted in Canada for determining the residency of both corporations7 and trusts.8 The law in Canada has not developed to the same level as that in the United Kingdom and, consequently, little guidance exists for applying the test.9 In St. Michael Trust,10 the Supreme Court of Canada explained that a fact-based review of central management and control of a corporation (or trust) is determinative, but did not explain how to apply the facts to make the determination. In Mark Higgins Rallying, it is clear that it was necessary to take a high-level picture of the operation by determining who was managing the business by making high-level decisions and where those persons were when they made those high-level decisions. Due to the lack of guidance in Canada, it is possible that the Canadian courts could consider this approach in the future.


1 2012 DTC 5063.

2 [2011] UKFTT 340 (TC).

3 While not stated in the case, the facts suggest that the Partnership was formed in the Isle of Man.

4 As set out in sections 111 and 112 of the Income and Corporations Taxes Act 1988 (UK).

5 [1989] STC 493 at 495.

6 This approach is similar to the Court of Appeal's decision in De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd. v. Howe (Surveyor of Taxes), 5 TC 198 at 212-213 where that Court concluded that one looks to the place where the high-level decisions are made, as distinct from the place where day-to-day business operations are carried out.

7 British Columbia Electric Railway v. R., 2 DTC 692 (1945); Crossley Carpets (Canada) Ltd. v. MNR, 67 DTC 522 (1967); and 1143132 Ontario Ltd. v. R., 2009 DTC 1312 (T.C.C.).

8 St. Michael Trust, supra note 1.

9 See, for example, British Columbia Electric Railway, Crossley Carpets, and 1143132 Ontario Ltd., supra note 7.

10 St. Michael Trust also relied on De Beers, supra note 6, as authority for corporate residency being based on where management and control is exercised. St. Michael Trust did not, however, consider the distinction between where high-level decisions are made as compared to where day-to-day business operations arecarried out.

About Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP (FMC)

FMC is one of Canada's leading business and litigation law firms with more than 500 lawyers in six full-service offices located in the country's key business centres. We focus on providing outstanding service and value to our clients, and we strive to excel as a workplace of choice for our people. Regardless of where you choose to do business in Canada, our strong team of professionals possess knowledge and expertise on regional, national and cross-border matters. FMC's well-earned reputation for consistently delivering the highest quality legal services and counsel to our clients is complemented by an ongoing commitment to diversity and inclusion to broaden our insight and perspective on our clients' needs. Visit:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
23 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Dentons and SheEO are coming together for an evening of #radicalgenerosity on October 23, 2017. Meet Vicki Saunders, Founder of SheEO, and learn about how SheEO is changing the landscape for female entrepreneurs.

23 Oct 2018, Seminar, Montreal, Canada

Dentons is pleased to invite you to join us for a breakfast seminar as part of the Les Matinées Dentons series on issues relevant to you and your business.

24 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

If you build it, claims may come. Join the Dentons Construction group for breakfast and an informative discussion on current topics in construction law.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions