Canada: Intellectual Property Enforcement In Canada

The Time it Takes to Move a Case Through the Courts
Last Updated: February 12 2003

Harry B. Radomski, Richard E. Naiberg and Julie M. Perrin

In Canada, the time required for an intellectual property case to reach final determination (including the exhaustion of all appeals) varies widely. There are cases that are determined in as little as two years and some that remain outstanding for as many as nineteen years. On average, an intellectual property infringement action can be expected to take between three to five years to reach trial. The appeal of the trial result may require at least a further year to be determined.

The principal factors that determine the length of a dispute are the nature of the dispute, the specific procedure invoked, the intensity with which the plaintiff prosecutes the matter, the frequency with which interim decisions are appealed, the degree of cooperation shown by each party, the complexity of the action and the expected trial length. Most Canadian courts have adopted measures to help bring cases to trial faster.

Intellectual property enforcement is typically litigated using one of two procedures. In pharmaceutical cases, where a patent contains claims to a medicine, or to the use of a medicine, the owner of the patent may invoke a summary application procedure to prevent the issuance of a marketing approval to the manufacturer of a generic version of the medicine before the expiry of the patent. The application procedure is also available in those very rare intellectual property cases where no facts are in dispute.

Applications are determined on the basis of affidavit evidence and transcripts of out-of-court cross-examinations upon the affidavit evidence. There is no right to complete pre-trial oral and documentary discovery. Applications are subject to fairly strict timetables and pre-hearing motions are rare. As a result, these proceedings, at least at the trial level, are often resolved within two years. However, in regard to the proceedings prohibiting the issuance of marketing approval for generic pharmaceuticals, they do not finally determine the patent rights of the parties, which may still be litigated by ordinary action.

Most intellectual property enforcement cases proceed as actions. These involve an initial exchange of pleadings, extensive documentary and oral discovery, the exchange of expert reports and a trial where witnesses give their evidence before a judge. Juries, although available in some courts, are rarely used.

In Canada, the plaintiff has the carriage of the action and can greatly influence the speed of its progression through trial. The rules of procedure contain fairly short deadlines for the completion of pre-trial steps, but it is up to the plaintiff to use these rules to its best advantage. A plaintiff interested in getting to trial quickly must first ensure that it meets its own procedural obligations, and then must attempt to force the defendant through the process as well. In many cases, the plaintiff will need to request that the court issue orders compelling the defendant to do certain things by specific deadlines. While motions to the court are expensive, they are typically effective in moving a case along.

In some cases, parties attempt to streamline the case by agreeing to try the issues of liability before having discovery and trial on the issue of remedy. In the liability stage of the action, the Court will determine issues of validity and infringement. If liability is established, the remedy stage will determine the nature and amount of the remedy to be awarded. This bifurcation may save time in some cases, but not in others.

As a case makes its way to trial, there are many opportunities for disagreement between the parties. Unlike some other jurisdictions, each party to a Canadian action decides, "on the honour system", which of its documents are relevant to the issues in the case and produces only those documents to other side. Further, at the examination for discovery, a question may be refused if the deponent's counsel asserts that it is not relevant. As may be expected, significant disputes arise over the relevance of documents and questions. These must often be resolved by the court at a motion.

These and other matters of disagreement can considerably slow a case as the parties wait for a motion date, its outcome, an appeal date, and for the outcome of the appeal. Further, in many intellectual property cases, examinations for discovery can be lengthy and their scheduling may require the coordination of the schedules of witnesses and counsel. The degree of cooperation between counsel is often of crucial importance to the speed with which a case is determined.

Finally, there is usually considerable delay in securing a trial date once a case is certified ready for trial, particularly in lengthy (more than one week) cases. The greater proportion of cases are heard in the Federal Court of Canada, a national court which has concurrent jurisdiction with provincial courts over intellectual property matters. The Federal Court currently has a trial wait time for lengthy cases of up to two years.

The Cost of Taking an Action Through the Courts

The costs of an intellectual property case include the filing fees that must accompany certain court documents, the costs of transcripts, photocopying, binding, travel, expert and witness fees, and most significantly, legal fees.

In addition, the losing party in a case must expect to pay at least a portion of the winning parties' reasonable legal costs. These costs are calculated on one of two scales. In ordinary cases, costs are calculated on the basis of a tariff that typically nets a figure that is approximately forty per cent of actual costs. In rare cases where the court finds a punitive level of costs is appropriate, costs can approach full indemnity.

Most intellectual property cases tried in Canada involve the use of expert evidence. As with lawyers, the cost of experts may be considerable and varies from case to case and expert to expert.

Due to the considerations outlined above, intellectual property enforcement actions can vary widely in cost. We would be pleased to discuss with you the estimated costs to be expected in a particular matter.

Whether Courts are Specialized for IP Matters

As noted above, intellectual property actions in Canada may be commenced in either the provincial courts or in the Federal Court of Canada. In most instances, the Federal Court is preferred because of the nation-wide effect of its orders (favouring a plaintiff) and its ability to expunge registrations for copyrights, trade-marks, patents, industrial designs and other intellectual property rights (favouring a defendant). However, the provincial courts must be used for trade-secret and breach of contract cases.

While the Federal Court does not hear only intellectual property actions, intellectual property actions form a large part of the matters which are before this Court, such that many judges of the Federal Court have expertise in this area. The experience of judges of the provincial courts with intellectual property cases is more varied.

Pro- or Anti-IP Owners?

Canadian courts, particularly the Federal Court of Canada, are regarded as being friendly to rightsholders. Intellectual property rights are given a broad and liberal interpretation to support their validity and to find infringement.

In addition, there is no doctrine of file wrapper estoppel in Canada and thus statements made by the applicant for an intellectual property right may not be used to interpret (i.e. limit) the scope of the right once issued. Further, the documentary disclosure requirements, which are lower than those in other jurisdictions, yield more favourable results for rights holders, particularly on issues of validity.

Remedies Available to Rights Owners

The remedies which may be available to intellectual property holders include:

  • Temporary and permanent injunctions preventing further infringement of an intellectual property right.
  • Seizure and delivery up for destruction of any articles in the defendant's position which are infringing of intellectual property rights.
  • Damages suffered by the rights-holder as a result of the infringement of its intellectual property rights, including, in the case of copyright, statutory damages.
  • As an alternative to compensatory damages, an accounting of the defendant's profits as a result of the infringement.
  • Punitive and exemplary damages.
  • Recovery of legal and expert expenses.

Key Points To Be Aware of When Enforcing IP Rights

When planning to litigate intellectual property rights in Canada, the potential plaintiff should keep in mind the following:

  • Different intellectual property cases are subject to different limitation periods. The applicability of limitation periods should be discussed with counsel before proceeding.
  • Canadian courts consider but do not simply adopt the decisions of foreign courts involving corresponding intellectual property rights.
  • Experimental and other non-commercial work with a patented article and repair of the article may not constitute infringement.
  • Canadian patent law provides certain exemptions from infringement for products acquired prior to the issuance of a patent. Counsel should be sought to determine if a given activity comes within this exemption.
  • Foreign plaintiffs, if requested, must post security for the defendants' costs as a condition of proceeding in Canada. The amount of security depends on the costs expected to be incurred by the defendants and may often be advanced in stages as the action progresses.
  • Information obtained at discovery, whether by written production or answer given, may not be used for any purpose collateral to the Canadian proceeding. Leave of the court is required for a party to use information obtained at discovery in another proceeding, or for any purpose other than the litigation itself. Improper use of such information may result in a contempt of court citation.
  • There is a specialized intellectual property bar. While general practitioners may take patent, copyright and trade-mark matters, particularly in the provincial courts, specialized counsel should be considered for all intellectual property litigation.

The Availability of Damages

An award of damages to a successful plaintiff in an intellectual property action is intended to place the plaintiff in the same position that it would have been in had the infringement not occurred. The party claiming damages has the burden of proving the nature and extent of the damages suffered. This burden is lightened somewhat by the readiness of the Court to presume that the invasion of a right-holder's monopoly will cause damage.

Damages may be calculated on the basis of lost profit to the rights-holder if it suffers such a loss. Alternatively, even if the rights-holder suffered no direct harm from the infringement, then the rightsholder may recover damages based on a calculation of a reasonable royalty.

Canadian Courts will consider claims for punitive damages in intellectual property infringement actions. However, an award of exemplary or punitive damages in an intellectual property action is an extremely rare occurrence. The Courts will more frequently punish egregious conduct on the part of an infringer with recovery of legal expenses on a full indemnity basis.

The Availability of Interlocutory Relief

The most common form of interlocutory relief is that of an interim or temporary interlocutory injunction preventing the continuation of infringement before trial.

In order to obtain interlocutory relief, an applicant must establish that:

  1. Its action raises a serious question to be tried;
  2. It will suffer irreparable harm if the interlocutory injunction is not granted; and
  3. The balance of convenience favours the grant of the interlocutory injunction.

The "serious question" part of the test requires the applicant to demonstrate only that its action is not frivolous and that it raises a serious issue to be determined. This is a fairly low threshold.

The more difficult hurdle is the second branch of the test, which requires an applicant to establish that it will suffer irreparable harm if an injunction is not granted to restrain the activities of the opposite party prior to trial. Irreparable harm is defined by Canadian courts to be harm that cannot be quantified in monetary terms or which cannot be cured by an award of damages and a prohibitory injunction, usually because one party cannot collect damages from the other. Examples include instances where a party will be put out of business or will suffer permanent market loss or irrevocable damage to its business reputation. The harm in each case will be assessed on its particular facts.

Finally, once an applicant for an injunction has established that it will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted, the Court will then make a determination as to where the balance of convenience lies. This is an inquiry into the relative harm to be suffered by the parties if an interlocutory injunction is granted or refused. This involves an exercise of the Court's discretion, and will vary according to the circumstances of each case.

Interlocutory injunctions are infrequently granted in intellectual property cases in Canada. However, this may be due more to the fact that it is the nature of intellectual property rights that they are primarily monetary and rarely incompensible rather than due to the high standards imposed by Canadian Courts.

An exception to the difficulties in obtaining interlocutory injunctions arises in the context of pharmaceutical patents, where Canadian legislation gives patent holders the right to an automatic "statutory injunction", without having to satisfy the test normally applicable for the grant of such relief, and enables patent holders to prevent competitors from entering the market. Legislation links the regulatory (health and safety) approval process for pharmaceutical products to pharmaceutical patent rights and allows patentees to invoke a twenty-four month statutory injunction where a generic competitor compares its product to that of the patent holder for the purposes of regulatory approval.

Alternatives to Litigation

Because intellectual property litigation is time intensive and draining on the parties' resources and finances, parties may wish to consider using Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques to resolve intellectual property disputes. However, it should be recognized that dispute resolution techniques outside the Court often do not succeed and that success is largely dependant upon the willingness of the parties to resolve the dispute without resorting to litigation.

Three alternatives to full scale litigation of intellectual property matters which are available in Canada are mediation, mini-trials or severing of issues, and binding arbitration. In a mediation, a mediator who is chosen or agreed upon by the parties meets with the parties either separately or together to encourage and to facilitate discussions in an attempt to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the dispute. Mediation is largely consensual and dependant upon the willingness of the parties to settle.

Mediation offers the benefits of decreasing costs and increasing the speed at which parties can resolve their differences, and offers flexibility in that the parties may select a mediator and can agree upon the process and the degree to which a decision will be binding. More significantly, mediation may have the effect of preserving the relationship between the parties.

However, mediation in intellectual property litigation has its limitations. Where the litigation involves substantial legal issues, the parties may prefer to have a judicial determination along with rights of appeal. Second, where intellectual property rights involve market exclusivity and the infringer is determined to be in the marketplace, the possibility of arriving at a mutually acceptable resolution is limited. There will be little a mediator can do to accommodate the desires of both parties, leaving a judicial determination as perhaps the only alternative.

The Federal Court can also conduct a mini-trial of the case, or a portion of the case, and render a nonbinding opinion as to the probable outcome of the proceeding. In addition, the Court has the power to sever issues and try them separately.

Finally, the parties may agree to binding arbitration. In binding arbitration, the parties agree to have the case determined by one or more persons (often retired judges) outside the court system. The result is usually agreed to be binding, with or without appeal rights. Arbitration allows the parties to achieve an expeditious conclusion to the dispute by a mutually agreeable arbitration or panel, often perceived to have the requisite expertise in the substantive aspects of the matter.

This Update is intended to provide general comment only and should not be relied upon as legal advice.

© Goodmans LLP, 2003.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.