Canada: Fully Secured @ Gowlings: September 26, 2012 - Volume 3, Number 3

Last Updated: September 27 2012

Edited by Richard Dusome

In this issue:

  • Mistaken Discharge and Loss of Priority Remedied By Equity (British Columbia)
  • Spotlight on Security Documents: The Tenant's Acknowledgement / Estoppel Certificate (Alberta)
  • Guarantees Included Within Mortgages Entitled to Longer Limitation Period in Ontario
  • Update on Ontario PPSA Computer Conversion
  • A Banker Asked Us: Making Guarantors Parties to the Loan Agreement

Mistaken Discharge and Loss of Priority Remedied By Equity (British Columbia)

By: Jonathan B. Ross (Vancouver) and Lorena Vlad* (Vancouver)

A recent British Columbia Supreme Court case illustrates the dangers posed by a technical loophole in the British Columbia Personal Property Security Act ("PPSA") and, at the same time, provides some hope for secured creditors who may have fallen victim to the loophole—losing their registered security interest through no fault of their own.

In KBA Canada1, the Court considered whether a mistakenly discharged security interest could be given priority despite the strict priority regime in place under the PPSA.

The facts were not overly complex. The Plaintiff KBA Canada, Inc. ("KBA") sold printing press equipment to a leasing arm of Wells Fargo, who then leased it to the Defendant 3S Printers Inc. ("3S"). As part of the sale to Wells Fargo, KBA agreed it would purchase and take an assignment of the lease if 3S defaulted. Upon making the lease, Wells Fargo registered a valid Purchase Money Security Interest ("PMSI") against the equipment in the BC Personal Property Registry ("PPR"). 3S defaulted and pursuant to the sale agreement KBA took an assignment of the lease and security interest from Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo was deleted and KBA was formally substituted as the secured creditor in the PPR registration. Subsequent to the sale transaction, in what appears to be simply an administrative error, Wells Fargo discharged the registered security interest in the PPR. KBA did not approve this discharge, nor did it have knowledge of it at the time. KBA eventually learned of the mistake after which Wells Fargo immediately re-registered the financing statement. The re-registration occurred after the statutory 30-day grace period for the reversal of mistaken discharges. As a result, by the strict operation of the priority regime under the PPSA, KBA lost its PMSI priority to the two prior registered general security holders. KBA sued to regain its priority.

The Court noted it odd that someone other than KBA could discharge KBA's PMSI, but neither the PPSA legislation nor the standard practice of BC Registry Services, which administers the PPR, have any safeguards to prevent this from happening. Evidence was deposed by the Deputy Registrar that there is "no system notification or administrative process to ensure that an application for discharge has been authorized by the registered security interest holder"2.

The source of this unfortunate state of affairs is s. 48 of the PPSA which provides that:

s. 48 A registration may be effected in the registry without proof that

(b) the registering party has authority to submit the discharge.

The Court found that the registry treats a discharge as a registration.

KBA argued successfully that despite the discharged registration, it was entitled to regain its priority by the operation of ss. 68 and 70 of the PPSA and the principles of unjust enrichment.

The Court held that ss. 68 and 70 of the PPSA allow the Court to apply principles of equity and fairness, and exercise limited discretion in determining priorities between secured interests. In this case, the Court determined that the circumstances were such that it would be unjust to punish KBA while granting a windfall to the general security holders.

It is important to consider the specific circumstances which allowed for the favourable result for KBA. The registration was discharged in error and no notice of it was received by KBA. Furthermore, no further secured advances were made by any of the affected parties after the discharge. As a result there was no prejudice whatsoever to the remaining secured creditors by the court granting the result it did. Rather, if the Court did not act the remaining creditors would receive a windfall.

This decision is a good reminder that exceptions may be made to the strict priority regime under the PPSA and that unregistered interests may be given priority over registered interests—but only in very limited circumstances. It is also a good illustration of a weakness in the PPSA/PPR system, and a reminder that creditors should be ever vigilant in maintaining and verifying their registrations.


*Lorena Vlad is a law student at the University of British Columbia. She summered with Gowlings in 2012 and will be returning to Gowlings as an articled student after her graduation in 2013.

1 KBA Canada, Inc. v 3S Printers Inc., 2012 BCSC 1078 ["KBA Canada"].

2 KBA Canada, at paragraph 20

Spotlight On Security Documents: The Tenant's Acknowledgement / Estoppel Certificate (Alberta)

By: Brian Twerdoff (Calgary)

Due to a lender's reliance upon the income streams associated with real property to be used as security in a commercial mortgage financing transaction, the leases that exist upon a borrower's property are the most important assets of that borrower next to the value of the land to be mortgaged. As those leases are a key element of the security taken by a lender in connection with a financing, a lender would do well to carefully assess their value in evaluating the risk associated with the financing transaction.

An Estoppel Certificate, also known as a Tenant's Acknowledgement or Status Statement, serves as independent verification to a lender of the terms and status of a particular lease of land from the tenant's perspective, enhancing a borrower's disclosure to a lender. Although they are not immune from challenges, these documents can serve to prevent a tenant from making claims in the future which are inconsistent with the certificate regarding matters that existed prior to the date of the certificate.

The strength of a borrower's leases will factor into the decision to provide financing and an Estoppel Certificate can assist in assessing a lease's value by providing a lender with a current snapshot of a lease, confirming its terms, parties and any outstanding current obligations. They bolster the disclosure of the borrower by revealing whether a landlord borrower is liable for items such as completing "Landlord's Work" and making payments to the tenant in the form of a tenant improvement allowance. This information can be used by a lender as a baseline in assessing risk and provide a window into the operational realities of the landlord/tenant relationship that are not discoverable by a review of the lease documentation and rent roll alone. This allows a lender to have a clearer picture of the revenue streams it can expect to receive in the event it must enforce its security.

Estoppel Certificates also give information to a lender regarding whether there have been defaults by the landlord or the tenant, whether options to extend the term or expand the premises have been exercised, and give an indication of the level of cooperation between the parties. They also allow a tenant to provide its perspective regarding the landlord's ability and willingness to satisfy its obligations.

Subject to the limitations contained in a particular lease, an Estoppel Certificate should typically contain the following provisions:

  • Certification that the lease is valid, unmodified, in full force and effect and is presently in good standing
  • A statement as to whether the tenant has accepted and taken possession of the premises
  • Confirmation of the commencement date, the expiry of the term and any renewal rights the tenant may have
  • A statement as to whether the tenant has sublet all or any portion of the premises
  • An acknowledgement as to the basic rent for the term, whether there are any prepaid rent or security deposits and the date to which the rent has been paid
  • Confirmation as to whether there are defaults under the lease by the landlord or the tenant that remain outstanding or uncured
  • A statement that any improvements that the landlord is responsible for have been satisfactorily completed or, in the alternative, a list of outstanding items
  • A declaration as to whether the tenant has any expansion, contraction, renewal, termination or purchase options and whether such options have been exercised
  • A statement that there is no existing dispute, claim, set-off, defence or counterclaim by or against the landlord; and
  • A statement that there are no allowances, incentives, inducements, or benefits or money owing or which may become due to the tenant under the lease

Overall, having a number of comprehensive Estoppel Certificates prior to closing will provide a lender with a level of enhanced disclosure of the details of its borrower's income stream and lease obligations to supplement and support its mortgage security package.

Guarantees Included Within Mortgages Entitled to Longer Limitation Period in Ontario

By: Richard Dusome (Toronto)*

A recent Ontario case has confirmed that guarantees included within registered mortgage documents enjoy the longer limitation period of ten years available under the Real Property Limitations Act1 rather than the standard two year limitation period for traditional guarantees under the Limitations Act, 20022.

The Marsig3 case arose from a motion for summary judgment made by the defendant guarantor ("Mr. Marsig") to dismiss a claim made against him on his guarantee of a mortgage which had gone into default. The mortgagee ("Equitable") had sued Mr. Marsig for the deficiency arising after the completion of its power of sale proceedings. Mr. Marsig had argued that his guarantee was a demand obligation, and that all demand obligations, including guarantees within a mortgage document, are governed by the Limitations Act, 2002. He submitted that the action against him on the guarantee was therefore statute-barred under Section 5 of that Act which establishes a general two year limitation period for all demand obligations. Mr. Marsig's initial motion was dismissed and he appealed.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the Real Property Limitations Act was the governing statute, not the Limitations Act, 2002, stating the legislature clearly intended that all limitation periods affecting land be governed by the Real Property Limitations Act. Thus, the fact that almost three years had elapsed between the time the notice of sale under mortgage was served on the guarantor (which was held to constitute a demand for payment), and the commencement date of the action for the deficiency claim, was irrelevant as the operative limitation period was ten years, not two years.

In support of its ruling, the Court noted that it would cause more confusion and uncertainty in the law if the limitation period for enforcing a mortgage debt was different from the limitation period for enforcing a guarantee of that debt4. The Court determined that mortgagees confronted with a shorter limitation period for the guarantee than for the mortgage debt would undoubtedly sue and attempt to collect the whole debt outstanding from the guarantor first to preserve the limitation period.5 Such action would be taken rather than proceeding in a more cost effective manner to realize on the security over the real property first, and then suing the guarantor only for the deficiency as Equitable had done in this case.6 The Court found this would be an undesirable situation for mortgage guarantors generally.

Section 43(1) of Real Property Limitations Act is drafted fairly broadly such that the ten year limitation period applies to any action upon a covenant contained in an indenture of mortgage, or "any other instrument made ... to repay the whole or part of any money secured by a mortgage". As such, the reference to any other instrument might be interpreted as making the ten year limitation period available to stand-alone guarantees relating specifically to real property, even though the guarantee is not embedded within the registered document itself. In Marsig, the Court did not have to address that issue based upon the facts before it. However, extending the Court's reasoning and statements that limitation periods affecting land were intended to be separate and distinct from general limitation periods, it seems likely that the Court would interpret Section 43(1) as extending to a stand-alone guarantee provided it relates solely to a mortgage debt. Until we have a case on that specific point however, the better practice for lenders wishing to lock in the benefit of a longer limitation period would appear to be to include any such guarantee within the registered document itself.


*Nate Appleton, an articling student in the Toronto Office, also contributed to this post

1 Real Property Limitations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L. 15, as amended.

2 Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sch. B, as amended.

3 The Equitable Trust Company v. Marsig et al., 109 O.R. (3d) 561 ["Marsig"].

4 Marsig, at page 568

5 Marsig, at pages 568-9.

6 Marsig, at page 569.

Update on Ontario PPSA Computer Conversion

By: Richard Dusome (Toronto)*

In an earlier edition of Fully Secured (July 14, 2010 - Volume 1, No. 1), we reported on the Ontario Government's deferral of the August 1, 2007 amendment to the Ontario PPSA which was designed to repeal the "Check the Box" system used on financing statements to identify the collateral charged. A new system requiring full collateral description narratives similar to that used in most other provinces and in the United States had been proposed. However, the implementation of that replacement system has been deferred to provide the Ministry with time to modify its PPSA computer search and registration system to accommodate the narratives.

The initially contemplated two year implementation period has now stretched into five years and counting. Based upon our discussions with Ministry officials, no implementation date has been set, and so far as we are aware, no regulations, Minister's orders or Registrar's orders have been drafted to effect the change. Therefore, it seems we will be using with the "Check the Box" system for a while longer. We will continue to monitor this matter and report on future developments.

*Nate Appleton, an articling student in the Toronto Office, also contributed to this post

A Banker Asked Us: Making Guarantors Parties to the Loan Agreement

By: Richard Dusome (Toronto)


The bank is obtaining several guarantees for a new loan in Ontario secured on personal property.Do I need to make each of the guarantors signatories or parties to the commitment letter or loan agreement?


As a general rule, it is always a good practice to include guarantors as signatories on the principal documents evidencing a loan.

Corporate guarantors and other business entities within the borrower's corporate group should be made parties to the commitment letter or loan agreement. In most cases these guarantors will be providing unlimited guarantees and joining in some, if not all, of the representations, warranties and covenants of the borrower. Making them parties to the loan agreement will ensure that they cannot claim they were unaware of the terms of the debt they are guaranteeing. As parties to the principal loan document, they will also be parties to any amendment to that document and will thereby be consenting to the terms of that amendment and the impact of those amended terms on their guarantees.

For guarantors providing guarantees that are either limited in amount or limited in recourse to certain assets, these guarantors must also be made parties if they are joining in some of the representations, warranties and covenants of the borrower. However, if they are not joining in those provisions, both the guarantors and the borrower will probably request that the guarantors not be included as parties. The guarantors will probably wish to avoid all the negotiations and circulation of document drafts prior to signing. In addition, the borrower will likely wish to avoid involving these guarantors in its affairs until the business deal has been settled. In these instances however, it will be necessary to ensure a guarantor's written acknowledgment is obtained to every post-closing amendment to the commitment letter or loan agreement.

For guarantors who are individuals, it is appropriate to have them be parties to the principal loan document where those individual guarantors are also officers or directors or shareholders of the borrower and have a close connection to its operations. If these individuals do not have that connection, then once again the borrower will likely wish to avoid making them parties and to avoid involving them in the transaction until the business deal with the lender has been settled. Provided all appropriate certificates of independent legal advice are obtained at the time of the execution and delivery of the guarantee, and periodic guarantor's acknowledgments are obtained on amendments and for the passage of time, those unconnected guarantors need not be parties to the principal loan document. Indeed, they will likely be limited guarantors or limited recourse guarantors in any event.

Overall, including guarantors as signatories on the principal documents evidencing a loan is a good approach unless client relationship issues or special circumstances like those described above exist.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.