Canada: The Court Of Appeal For British Columbia Confirms That Consultation By The Province On Decision To Incorporate Municipality Was Adequate

Last Updated: August 15 2012
Article by Charles F. Willms


In Adams Lake Indian Band v. British Columbia, the Supreme Court of British Columbia found that the Province failed to adequately consult with the petitioner, Adams Lake Indian Band, prior to creating the Sun Peaks Mountain Resort Municipality by an Order in Council. The Supreme Court made a declaration that the Province did not fulfill its duty to consult with the petitioner with respect to the incorporation, and ordered the Province to engage in deep consultation with the petitioner regarding the incorporation decision. The Supreme Court decided it was not appropriate to dictate terms of reference for further consultation.

On August 9, 2012 the BC Court of Appeal allowed the appeal from the Supreme Court decision and dismissed the Petition, finding that the Province discharged any consultation duty it had to the Adams Lake Band in relation to the incorporation of the Sun Peaks Resort Municipality.  The Court of Appeal also held that the other matters taken into account in relation to past Crown conduct or continuing Crown conduct by the Supreme Court Judge were not proper matters for consideration on the Petition.


The petitioner, the Adams Lake Indian Band, is a member of the Secwepemc Nation, which claims a traditional territory covering close to 180,000 square kilometres.  The Sun Peaks ski area, located 40 km north of Kamloops, is located within the territory claimed by the Secwepemc Nation.

Sun Peaks was a small ski hill known as Tod Mountain until the 1990s. In 1993, the Provincial government entered into a master development agreement with Tod Mountain Development Ltd. (now Sun Peaks Resort Corporation) that contemplated a phased expansion of the ski hill by the development of resort facilities and other recreational improvements. This facilitated rapid expansion of the ski resort, and in turn, created increased conflict with the Secwepemc Nation and its members. In the midst of this ongoing conflict, the residents of Sun Peaks sought to attain status as an incorporated municipality.

The process towards incorporation began in 2005 when a group of volunteers from the community developed a feasibility study. The Province first became involved in the incorporation process in December 2006, when it provided a grant to cover the costs of the study and the public meetings on the subject.

In January 2007, one of the members of the Secwepemc Nation wrote to the Regional District and to Sun Peaks Resort Corporation expressing opposition to the incorporation and asking for a meeting to discuss the situation. From that point onward, the parties engaged in consultation regarding the incorporation, and related topics such as the Sun Peaks master development agreement.

In July 2009, the Province advised certain members of the Secwepemc Nation that its position was that consultation was complete, as the questions posed by the bands had been answered.  The Province's position was that any issues raised by the bands had been accommodated by the creation of a municipal First Nations Advisory Committee, and by a requirement for the Provincial government to approve the municipality's land use plan and by-laws. The Province emphasized that the primary concern it had heard from the bands was the development of Sun Peaks resort, and that this would be addressed through the ongoing consultation process with respect to the master development agreement. The Secwepemc Nation rejected this position. The Supreme Court found that after July 2009, the Province "was only going through the motions" to complete the incorporation consultation, and that the bands involved legitimately lost interest in participating.

The Order in Council incorporating the municipality was signed on March 25, 2010.

Supreme Court Decision

Orders in Council and the Duty to Consult

The Supreme Court held that the duty to consult does apply to the exercise of a statutory power (such as incorporation of a municipality by Order in Council).  The Supreme Court found that all steps leading up to the decision to incorporate engaged the honour of the Crown, and that there was no justification for insulating the Order in Council from the duty to consult because it had a legislative character.

The Crown's Strength of Claim and Impacts Assessments

The Supreme Court found that the Province did not conduct a preliminary assessment of the strength of claim for the petitioner, and accordingly that the Province failed to adequately fulfill the first stage of the consultation process.

With respect to impacts, the Province's position was that the incorporation had no significant impact because it maintained the status quo, and the petitioner's real concern was the development of the resort. The Supreme Court found that the Province misconceived the impacts of the incorporation on the petitioner's rights and title. In particular, the Supreme Court found, among other things, that the incorporation resulted in the municipality exercising control over many aspects of local government that would be subject to a duty to consult with First Nations if exercised by the Crown, but that the municipality did not have a duty to consult.

The Adequacy of Consultation

The Supreme Court found that the petitioner had a strong claim and faced highly significant potential adverse impacts as a result of the incorporation of the municipality, and therefore the duty to consult with the petitioner was at the level of "deep consultation".

The accommodation provided by the Province in respect of the concerns raised by the petitioner was a requirement that the municipality establish a First Nations Advisory Committee. The Supreme Court found that this accommodation was not responsive to the concerns raised by the petitioner. For example, the Supreme Court noted that the municipality is not required to consult with the Advisory Committee, and the Committee did little to redress the balance of power and influence as between the bands and the Sun Peaks Resort Corporation.

As a result, the Supreme Court found that the petitioner was not adequately consulted regarding the decision to incorporate the municipality.


The Supreme Court made a declaration that the Province did not fulfill its duty to consult with the petitioner with respect to the incorporation, and ordered the Province to engage in deep consultation with the petitioner regarding the decision to incorporate. The Supreme Court decided it was not appropriate to dictate terms of reference for the further consultation beyond what was expressly set out in the reasons for decision.

Court of Appeal Decision

Orders in Council and the Duty to Consult

The Court of Appeal did not disturb the conclusion of the Supreme Court Judge that the Province had a duty to consult with the Petitioners in relation to the incorporation of the municipality.

The Crown's Strength of Claim and Impacts Assessments

The Court of Appeal decided that in light of the conclusion of the Supreme Court Judge that:

... the change in local government from a regional district/improvement district form of governance to an incorporated municipality on its face placed the Band in no worse position tha[n] it was before incorporation.

it was not necessary for the Province to provide a strength of claim assessment.  The Court of Appeal said:

... that it was not necessary in this case for the Ministry of Community or the court to do an analysis of the strength of the claim to Aboriginal rights and title.  As will become clear, the impact of incorporation on the Bands' claim to rights and title was and remains insubstantial.  This is so regardless of the strength of the claim that would have been revealed by a strength-of-claim analysis.

The Court of Appeal also confirmed that the only relevant Crown conduct to be considered in relation to the duty to consult was the incorporation of the municipality.  The Court of Appeal noted, with respect to allegations of prior failures to consult and failure to discharge ongoing consultation obligations:

[69]        These passages and others show that the chambers judge included in her analysis the continuing land-use issues and the issues advanced by the Bands as to the past development of Sun Peaks.  Continuing land-use issues involve the proposed amendments to the MDA and the changes to timber resources supervision, the subjects of ongoing consultation.  Past development impact issues remain to be addressed in a final judicial or negotiated determination of the claim to Aboriginal title and rights – see Rio Tinto at para. 49

The Adequacy of Consultation

The Court of Appeal conclusion that consultation was adequate was succinct:

[78]        In my view, it follows that the consultation with respect to the issue of incorporation of the Municipality as described above was adequate.  The Ministry of Community provided information about the structure of the intended mountain resort municipality and the legal effects of incorporation.  It also gave the Bands more than sufficient opportunity to respond.  The process was as thorough and as comprehensive as the circumstances required.  I disagree with the conclusions of the chambers judge to the contrary.  Those conclusions were coloured by broader consultation considerations than were appropriate or necessary.  The judge erred by not analyzing the adequacy of consultation with respect to the incorporation matter alone. 

[79]        I also consider that the accommodation made by the Province was reasonable.  As the chambers judge noted, there was a requirement that the Municipality form a First Nations advisory committee, at least until the end of 2014, a First Nations role that did not exist under the existing form of local governance. 


The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and dismissed the Petition


There is still a difference of opinion between the Alberta Courts and the BC Courts on whether a duty to consult applies to a legislative act such as the issuance of an Order in Council. The Supreme Court of Canada declined to resolve this issue in Rio Tinto. At some point, it is likely that the issue will have to be resolved by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Court of Appeal has made it clear that:

1.         Allegations of past Crown conduct, or continuing Crown conduct, on which consultation was or is allegedly inadequate are not relevant to the determination of the question of whether consultation on the impugned Crown conduct is adequate.

2.         Where the impacts of the Crown conduct on the asserted rights is insubstantial, there is no requirement for the Crown, or the Court, to consider the strength of claim of the First Nation, and

3.         "[63] ... It is not generally the role of the court to supervise ongoing consultations and provide directions as to how they are to be conducted.  It is only where there has been a breach by government of the duty to consult that a legal remedy might be sought, usually by way of a petition for the suspension or quashing of a government initiative.  Pleadings define the issues before the court and the inquiry by the court should be limited thereby.  The court should avoid involvement in ongoing consultations."

Link to Decision

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.