We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
The notice was released in response to enquiries regarding the
"flow-through" theory for adviser registration,
which, as announced in July 2009, has been discontinued in
respect of the adviser registration requirement under
NI 31-103. Under the discontinued theory, OSC staff had
taken the view that advice to an investment fund "flowed
through" to the investors in the fund and thus required the
adviser to the fund to register as an adviser in Ontario, or be
exempted from such registration, if any units of the fund were sold
in the province. Under NI 31-103, however, the adviser to a fund
must register as a portfolio manager in the jurisdiction where the
fund is established, regardless of where the fund's investors
are located.
Ultimately, yesterday's notice confirms that OSC staff
take the same view regarding the elimination of
"flow-through" theory under the Commodity Futures Act and
the requirement to register as with NI 31-103.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
An insider trading decision of the Alberta Securities Commission (the "Commission") released on April 10, 2013, provides a thoughtful and practical approach by a securities commission to its assessment of what constitutes a "material fact".
This article touches on some of the key types of businesses and explains what a might be the typical role of a lawyer in providing advice or assistance to you in setting up your business or in having others join you in your business.
In the decision MDV Representations v. Corporation Xprima.com, the Superior Court highlights the importance of drafting termination clauses in a service contract using clear and simple language.
The Alberta Court of Appeal has recently released a decision that adds much needed clarity to when an officer or director of a corporation will be personally liable for torts committed by a corporation.
A discussion on a recent case, which provides a cautionary tale on the dangers of entering into a share purchase agreement and subsequently closing a share purchase transaction, without ample due diligence.
In our last post, we outlined some of the reasons why corporate spin-offs are used. In this post, we address some of the most common methods used to implement the corporate spin-off.