We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
Earlier this week, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of
Canada (IIROC) published Notice 12-0207 setting out its circuit
breakers for the third quarter of 2012, which are set in
coordination with those in U.S. markets. In the U.S.,
trading halts occur based on trigger levels of 10%, 20% and
30% drops of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, calculated at
the beginning of each quarter using the previous month's
average closing value. The NYSE thresholds for Q3 2012 are 1,250
points, 2,500 points and 3,750 points respectively.
It is IIROC's policy that it will coordinate trading halts
with U.S. markets, but for days when Canadian markets are open and
American markets are closed, IIROC has published related
triggers based on drops in the S&P/TSX Composite
Index. The TSX trigger levels are: Level 1 (10%)
- 1,150 points; Level 2 (20%) - 2,300 points and Level 3
(30%) - 3,400 points, and result in trading halts ranging from
30 minutes to the balance of the trading session, depending on the
time of day and magnitude of the market decline.
Note: The thresholds in the original
IIROC notice were inadvertently transposed. An updated notice
is expected soon.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
An insider trading decision of the Alberta Securities Commission (the "Commission") released on April 10, 2013, provides a thoughtful and practical approach by a securities commission to its assessment of what constitutes a "material fact".
This article touches on some of the key types of businesses and explains what a might be the typical role of a lawyer in providing advice or assistance to you in setting up your business or in having others join you in your business.
In the decision MDV Representations v. Corporation Xprima.com, the Superior Court highlights the importance of drafting termination clauses in a service contract using clear and simple language.
The Alberta Court of Appeal has recently released a decision that adds much needed clarity to when an officer or director of a corporation will be personally liable for torts committed by a corporation.
A discussion on a recent case, which provides a cautionary tale on the dangers of entering into a share purchase agreement and subsequently closing a share purchase transaction, without ample due diligence.
In our last post, we outlined some of the reasons why corporate spin-offs are used. In this post, we address some of the most common methods used to implement the corporate spin-off.