We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
The Ontario Ministry of Labour conducts various "inspection
blitzes", which they advertise ahead of time, by sector. They
have recently announced the upcoming inspection blitzes for the
industrial sector, the health care sector and the construction
sector. You can follow the links below, which set out details of
the inspection blitzes and further information including fact
sheets.
Industrial: May to August 2012 in regards to new and young
worker initiatives, October to November 2012 with regards to
machine guarding, MSD, workplace violence, etc. and February to
March 2013 with regards to slips, trips and falls (ladder safety
and fall protection hazards). Industrial Blitzes
Heath Care: May to August 2012 in regards to new and young
worker initiatives, October to November 2012 with regards to
infection, prevention and control and February to March 2013 with
regards to workplace violence and harassment. Health Care Blitzes
Construction: May to August 2012 in regards to new and young
worker initiatives, June 2012 with regards to hazards associated
with traffic control during road work, July – August 2012
with regards to wasting hazards, September – October 2012
with regards to supervisory responsibilities, training and
requirements and February - March 2013 with regards to slips, trips
and falls (ladder safety and fall protection hazards). Construction Blitzes
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench released a concerning decision on May 16th in Telecommunications Workers Union v Telus Communications Inc., 2013 ABQB 298.
In a recent decision, the Divisional Court of Ontario further confirmed the approach to, and difficulty with, "misclassification" overtime class-actions.
This case asked the Court to consider the unusual situation of a party to a potentially valid polygamous marriage (performed in Pakistan) asking for a divorce from her husband. Initially, the Court of Queen’s Bench declined to hear evidence from either party on the basis that Ms. Azam had admitted in her pleadings that Mr. Jan was married at the time of their marriage in Pakistan, and thus the marriage was void.