On May 24, 2012, the Ontario Integrity Commissioner called for a
review of the Lobbyists Registration Act, 1998 (Ontario).
The Integrity Commissioner concurrently serves as the Lobbyist
Registrar of Ontario, and is responsible for the administration of
the Act. The Commissioner first issued a call for a review one year
ago in her annual report.
Provide the Lobbyists Registrar with the power to investigate
complaints and issue penalties, including administrative monetary
penalties, public reporting of contraventions, and restrictions
against lobbying. At present, when the Office receives a complaint,
it follows an informal process to resolve the issue. The
Commissioner believes the ability to receive and review complaints,
along with the penalty provisions, would serve to encourage
Eliminate the "significant part of duties" threshold.
The Act requires that in-house lobbyists must register only if they
spend 20% or more of their time on lobbying activities. The
Commissioner recommends that all paid lobbyists should be required
to register, regardless of the time spent lobbying.
Combine the two types of in-house lobbyists (persons &
partnerships, and organizations). The Commissioner believes the
current system is unnecessarily confusing. For example, in-house
lobbyists in the first category must register individually;
in-house lobbyists in the second are listed on a single form under
the name of the organization's senior officer. A simplified
process would increase transparency.
Require the same type of information from all lobbyists, and
permit the Registrar to introduce new categories of information if
it aligns with the spirit of the Act. This would establish a common
format, and allow the Registrar to ask for more information when
she considers it helpful.
Introduce a restriction to prevent persons who lobby from being
paid to provide advice to government on the same subject
Require former public officers who lobby to register on the
Registry regardless of time spent lobbying and align the
postemployment rules for ministers' staff with the Act.
Clarify that "grass-roots communications" (a type of
indirect communication) is lobbying.
Clarify that in-house lobbyists include directors.
Observers should be aware that there is no requirement to change
the Act. The Commissioner is simply suggesting changes with the
stated goal that "Ontario must strive to achieve the highest
level of transparency possible about lobbying activities."1
Any amendments to the existing legislation would necessitate a
legislative review, complete with committee study, witnesses, and
FMC is one of Canada's leading business and litigation law
firms with more than 500 lawyers in six full-service offices
located in the country's key business centres. We focus on
providing outstanding service and value to our clients, and we
strive to excel as a workplace of choice for our people. Regardless
of where you choose to do business in Canada, our strong team of
professionals possess knowledge and expertise on regional, national
and cross-border matters. FMC's well-earned reputation for
consistently delivering the highest quality legal services and
counsel to our clients is complemented by an ongoing commitment to
diversity and inclusion to broaden our insight and perspective on
our clients' needs. Visit:
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In the latest important decision from the Supreme Court of Canada on aboriginal law, the court held that individual members of an Aboriginal group cannot invoke "self-help" remedies, such as blockades—when claiming that the government breached its duty to consult the Aboriginal group before making a decision affecting the group.