Canada: The Social Media Challenge - Discipline, Good Character, And The Right To Freedom Of Expression

Last Updated: April 30 2012
Article by Bonnie Bokenfohr

Professional regulators are beginning to grapple with the impact that social media such as Facebook and blog postings will have on their regulatory functions. Just as cases on the impact of social media in the workplace are starting to work their way through the legal system, so too are cases involving professional regulatory bodies. Social networking sites and internet postings can provide evidence relevant to the assessment of good character. They may also demonstrate behaviour that is unprofessional. As professional regulatory bodies in Canada begin to consider issues involving social media, they will also have to remain mindful of the impact that their actions have on their members' right to freedom of expression.


It is well established that professional regulatory bodies are able to deal with the misconduct of members even if the misconduct does not arise from the member's activities as a registered member. While private conduct will not always be unprofessional conduct, it can become unprofessional conduct when it affects the member's integrity, professional character or impacts on the reputation of the profession as a whole. When members inappropriately use social media such as internet blogs, it sometimes raises the issue of whether such "off duty conduct" is unprofessional.

Last year, regulators in both Ontario and British Columbia considered internet blog postings of their members.

The College of Optometrists of Ontario received a complaint from one of its members that another member had posted personal and derogatory comments about him online hiding behind a pseudonym.1 The complainant complained that the content of the posting and use of a pseudonym was "disgraceful, dishonorable, unprofessional or unethical". The investigated member admitted to sending the email under the pseudonym and apologized for his conduct but defended himself against the allegation on the basis that while his comments were "intemperate or ill-considered" they did not amount to unprofessional conduct. Nor, he argued, was the use of a pseudonym unprofessional, disgraceful or discreditable. The investigated member also argued that the matter was outside the jurisdiction of the College as the complaint did not involve patient safety or engage his fitness to practice.

The Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee of the College found that the investigated member did not act unprofessionally in expressing his opinion on a publicly accessible website or by using a pseudonym to bring the website to the attention of others.

The complainant appealed the matter to the Appeal Board. The Board found that the Committee's decision was unreasonable on the basis that the Committee should have paid more attention to the personal and derogatory content of the postings. The Board did not specifically address the use of the pseudonym. Given that the investigated member had already recognized that his actions were wrong, the Board did not refer that matter back for reconsideration.

The Law Society of British Columbia also considered comments posted by one of its members on the internet.2 A BC lawyer posted comments that included discourteous and personal remarks about an Ontario lawyer. These included, "This is the kind of guy that gives lawyers a bad name. He is relying on intimidation and blackmail to get the lousy $500. Don't pay him. I hate these sleazy operators". The BC lawyer argued that his comments were justified due to the blameworthy conduct of the Ontario lawyer.

The Hearing Panel found that the blog posting was a mixture of conduct in the lawyer's practice and his private life. In this regard they noted that he identified himself as a lawyer and received potential file referrals as a result of his blog posting. Regardless of whether the blog posting was private or professional, the Hearing Panel found that the blog posting constituted professional misconduct as it was a marked departure from the conduct expected of members of the Law Society. The lawyer was ordered to pay a $1,500 fine and $3,000 in costs.

Registration Requirement – Good Character

Just as internet postings and social networking sites may offer evidence of unprofessional conduct, they may also provide evidence relevant to the assessment of good character when considering applications for registration.

Last year a hearing panel of the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) considered the content of an applicant's blog in assessing the applicant's character. 3

The applicant applied to the LSUC to be admitted as a paralegal. The Law Society opposed the application on the basis that she was not of good character. One of twelve factors cited by the Law Society were blogs maintained by the applicant that contained unsubstantiated and defamatory allegations against a number of organizations and individuals. The blogs also contained statements that were discriminatory or threatened violence to individuals. The applicant admitted to being the author of the blogs and in her evidence attempted to provide justifi cation for the content.

The LSUC hearing panel held that the blogs adversely impacted upon the applicant's reputation and integrity as well as the reputation and integrity of the legal profession and the administration of justice. The panel further held that the information on the blogs demonstrated that the applicant did not have concern for or possess the qualities required of a member of the LSUC being, fairness, accuracy, integrity and respect for the rule of law. The application was denied with the blogs being one of eleven factors cited by the panel in support of its decision.

The Right to Freedom of Expression

While social media may be changing how we communicate, the tension between the duty of professional regulatory bodies to protect the public interest and the rights of regulated members to freedom of expression is not new. Before internet blogs and social networking sites professional regulatory bodies wrestled with their members' letters to the editor, pamphlets and picketing. In addition to raising issues about when a member's conduct in their private life can be the subject of disciplinary action, these cases also raise issues about the extent to which professional regulators can restrict their members' freedom of expression – a right protected by s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As social media provides an ever expanding platform for expression, these issues will likely increasingly land on the doorstep of regulators.

Recommendations for Regulators

In the College of Optometrists of Ontario case discussed above, the Appeal Board of the College of Optometrists of Ontario concluded its decision by commenting that the case


College des medecins du Quebec v. Genest, 2011 QCCA 1683.

A disciplined member who was in compliance with disciplinary sanctions and penalties sought to be re-registered as a member in good standing with her College. The Quebec Court of Appeal held that upon the member satisfying the sanctions and conditions imposed by the Disciplinary Committee, the College had no discretion to deny her reinstatement and held that reinstatement was automatic.

The member was the subject of several disciplinary complaints over the space of a year and was provisionally struck from the register pending a decision on the merits. A decision on the merits was made on August 1, 2006, in which the Discipline Committee convicted the member of eight counts. In May 2007, it imposed a penalty of a permanent restriction on the member's ability to practice medicine, with the exception of providing operating assistance in an urban public hospital. However, the member's striking from the register was not extended or made permanent.

The member appealed the decision. She also sought to have her status as a member in good standing at the College confirmed, so that she could practice medicine in accordance with the restrictions imposed by the Discipline Committee. The College's Administrative Committee informed her that, in light of the permanent restrictions on her practice, she would have to re-apply for reinstatement. She did so and was denied, and an application for reconsideration was also denied. She then applied for judicial review of the decisions to deny her reinstatement, arguing that she either should be automatically reinstated following the decision on the merits that ended her provisional striking from the register, or she was entitled to re-enrolment as a member in good standing upon her compliance with the disciplinary conditions imposed on her and her fulfillment of the requirements for application to be admitted.

The College argued that in denying the member's reinstatement, it was acting in fulfillment of its mandate to protect the public interest. The Quebec Superior Court, in a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal, rejected this argument. It held that the College's Administrative Committee had overstepped its authority and usurped the role of the Discipline Committee when it attempted to impose further conditions beyond those made by the Discipline Committee on the member's reinstatement as a member in good standing.

The Court of Appeal held that the Administrative Committee had no discretion or authority to deny reinstatement to the member once the sanctions had been complied with. In so doing, the Court rejected the College's argument that its general mandate to protect the public interest allowed it to step outside the specifi c role it had been prescribed in the legislative scheme.

Commentary: Where a disciplined member satisfies or complies with penalties or sanctions imposed as a result of misconduct, any further disciplinary action will be deemed improper and unlawful. Once a member has complied with sanctions ordered by a discipline tribunal, the registration committee cannot deny registration or reinstatement as that would have the effect of increasing the penalty ordered by the discipline tribunal.


1 T.F. v. S.T., 2011 CanLII 14376 (ON HPARB).

2 Laarakker (Re), 2011 LSBC 29; 2012 LSBC 2.

3 Ormilla Bhoopaul v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2011 ONLSHP 35.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions