Canada: Careful On The Plea Of Conspiracy

Last Updated: April 24 2012
Article by Munaf Mohamed and Alison J. Gray

Most fraud recovery claims involve a claim of conspiracy. Fraud by its nature is opaque and in many cases the victim knows it has been defrauded, knows that a number of parties were involved, knows that the money or assets have been hidden or moved outside of the jurisdiction beyond reach and knows that the ill-gotten gains can be moved faster than the victim can chase them. In looking to attach liability to the individuals behind the fraud, the plea of conspiracy is usually advanced. However, in many cases the particulars of the conspiracy are vague and difficult to ascertain. The recent decision in HSBC Bank of Canada v. 1100336 Alberta Ltd. (Incredible Electronics Wholesale), 2011 ABQB 748 is instructive on how parties must be careful in the manner in which they allege and marshal evidence to prove the "agreement" or "common design" necessary to establish a conspiracy.

Background

HSBC Bank of Canada alleged the Defendants Fuss, Kendrick, Thuna, and the Defendant companies controlled by those individuals, conspired to prevent HSBC realizing a debt owing by 828326 Alberta Ltd.

Kendrick was a director and shareholder in 828326, as was HBC Business Credit Inc., a corporation controlled by Fuss. Fuss's wife, Thuna, was a director of 828326 and HBC. Fuss was a director of the Defendant 1100336 Alberta Ltd.

HSBC began providing financing to 828326 in 2001 through an operating line of credit. As security for the debt, 828326 executed a General Security Agreement (GSA), granting HSBC a charge on all personal property of 828326, including its goodwill, revenues, income contract agreements, book debts, accounts receivable and all other property and things of value. It was also a term of the GSA that any money collected or received as proceeds or in respect of accounts, contractual rights or rights to payment were subject to a trust in favour of HSBC.

By January 29, 2004, 828326 owed $862,000.00, and HSBC served written notice that it would no longer honour any of 828326's cheques. On March 8, 2004, HSBC made a demand for payment and on March 28 and 29, 2004, Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) was retained by HSBC. PWC was later appointed receiver and manager of the business and undertakings of 828326. HSBC later petitioned 828326 into bankruptcy. PWC's recovery from 828326 was negligible.

The Fraudulent Scheme

At the beginning of February 2004, Fuss and Kendrick decided to continue the business of 828326 by opening an account with Toronto Dominion Canada Trust Bank (TD) on February 5. Unbeknownst to HSBC, the TD account was opened on February 4, 2004, in the name of the Defendant Electronics Wholesale (Edmonton) Ltd. (EWE), and not 828326. Thuna was a director of EWE. From that point on, all receivables coming to 828326 were deposited in the TD account. Fuss and Kendrick subsequently incorporated 1100336 on April 1, 2004, and 1100336 took over the operation of the 828326 business. Both EWE and 1100336 were successors of 828326 and carried on 828326's business.

The Court found that 1100336 was used by the Defendants in an attempt to strip 828326 of its assets. The transfer of property from 828326 to 1100336 and the use of the EWE TD bank account represented an intentional and deliberate process designed to sequester 828326's assets in 1100336, and leave 828326 with the liability to HSBC. 1100336 had no legitimate business purpose; it was created solely for the purpose of defeating a creditor claim (that of HSBC).

HSBC alleged that the Defendants' actions from February 4, 2004, onwards amounted to a conspiracy against HSBC to deprive it from recovering the debt owing by 828326, which would then allow it to attach liability directly against the individual defendants, who had assets.

Kendrick's Fraud

The only defendant to be found to have engaged in fraud was Kendrick. Kendrick's fraud involved creating misleading or incorrect accounting and stock information for 828326, and intentionally destroying 828326's electronic records. While the Court did not find that Fuss and Thuna knew of the details of Kendrick's fraudulent activities, he found that they were aware of, endorsed, and played a part in the transfer of 828326's business to 1100336.

Unlawful Conduct Conspiracy

The legal elements of unlawful conduct conspiracy were set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Cement Lafarge v. B.C. Lightweight Aggregate, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 452, and recently affirmed in Agribrands Purina Canada Inc. v. Kasamekas, [2011] ONCA 460. To be successful in a claim for the tort of unlawful conduct conspiracy, the following elements must be present:

  1. The parties acted in combination or in concert, by agreement or with a common design;
  2. The conduct complained of is unlawful;
  3. The conduct is directed towards the complainants;
  4. The parties know that, in the circumstances, injury to the complainants is likely to result; and
  5. The conduct causes injury to the complainants.

The Court found that the last three elements of the test were satisfied, and the bulk of the Court's decision focuses on the first two elements of the test: agreement or common design, and unlawful conduct. Of interest for our purposes, however, is the Court's discussion of the first element – the agreement or common design that must be present to prove unlawful conduct conspiracy.

Agreement or Common Design

The Court noted that in unlawful conduct conspiracy, the "agreement" or "common design" does not have to be formal, but the parties must actually enter into an agreement, as opposed to merely being in agreement – a common intention independently arrived at by several persons is insufficient to establish the existence of an agreement in conspiracy. The Court further held that in order to be a party to conspiracy, one must know the facts of the alleged agreement or common design, and have intended to be a party to the common design. Knowledge of, or acquiescence to, the impugned course of conduct is not, in itself, sufficient to render one a party to the conspiracy.

In this case, the Court concluded that Kendrick and Fuss actively conspired to defeat HSBC's ability to recover 828326's assets and funds by agreeing to operate 828326's business through the EWE TD account and incorporating 1100336 to continue the sale of the inventory and collect receivables of 828326. Thuna was also found to have conspired against HSBC because she was aware that 828326 was in trouble and that its business was operating as EWE and 1100336, willingly carried out Fuss's instructions, and knew their effect.

After considering the remaining four elements of the test, the Court concluded that HSBC proved all elements of civil conspiracy, and found Kendrick, Fuss and Thuna liable to HSBC, along with the corporate Defendants.

Comment

While the outcome of this case was positive for HSBC, the decision is a strong reminder that parties must be cautious in pursuing claims of conspiracy in a fraud recovery context. In this case, the Court suggests that the tort of unlawful conduct conspiracy requires a complainant to prove that 1) the conspiring parties knew of the facts of the "agreement" or "common design" and, 2) they intended to be a party to the common design. According to the Court, mere knowledge of or acquiescence to the impugned conduct is not sufficient to render someone party to a conspiracy. The standard is high.

Victims of fraud must be careful in pursuing claims of conspiracy in the fraud context where it is inevitable that there will be individuals involved in the fraudulent scheme who are not the "masterminds" of the scheme but whose actions are clearly integral to the success of the scheme. While these individuals may not be privy to all of the details of the fraudulent scheme, they would certainly be aware that their actions are unlawful, assist in perpetrating the fraud, and cause injury to the victims.

The Court's decision in this case seems to suggest that the mere fact of knowing the "mastermind" is perpetuating a fraud is not sufficient to prove conspiracy. As a result, the decision might be read to suggest that all of the parties involved in the fraudulent scheme have to acknowledge in some fashion that they are undertaking a conspiracy to defraud. This may be an unattainable standard in practice.

Consequently, it is important that fraud victims be careful when pleading conspiracy and collecting evidence to support the claim in order to ensure that all the parties to the fraud can be shown to have been party to a common design or agreement to defraud, regardless of their actual role in the fraudulent scheme.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Munaf Mohamed
Alison J. Gray
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions